Scrutiny over potential Aus retail merger

Last updated 09:48 11/02/2014

Relevant offers

World

Jetstar plane starts taxiing to runway with ground worker attached to nose Australian directors hit with $651 million compensation order, fines, bans A photographer spent 25 years documenting rich people - here's what she learned Warning of global pension time bomb - US$70 trillion savings gap is growing Mark Zuckerberg tells Harvard grads that automation will take jobs, and it's up to millennials to create more Man is suing Hershey for US$5 million for 'under-filling' his box of Whoppers Winery or 'weedery': US vineyards rip up grapes, switch to pot Ansell finds its condom division wasn't a good fit Five missed chances to foil the Manchester bomber Top 10 richest Australians worth A$100 billion - AFR Rich List

Australia's consumer watchdog says it would investigate the impact of a potential tie-up of David Jones and Myer on competition if the department store chains decided to pursue a merger.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission on Monday distanced itself from suggestions it would be unlikely to object to a possible merger between the two retailers, saying it had not formed a view on the issue.

"The ACCC wishes to make clear that it has formed no such view and it has provided no such indication, either formally or informally, to Myer or any other person," The ACCC said in a statement.

But it said it would launch a review of possible competition issues in the event the companies decided to merge.

"Should Myer or David Jones decide to pursue a merger the ACCC will then conduct a very thorough review, in accordance with its published guidelines, that would explore a range of potential competition issues."

David Jones revealed late last month it had received a merger proposal from Myer in October.

The A$3 billion ($3.2 billion) proposal would have effectively seen David Jones investors trade their shares for a stake in Myer, but with no premium offered.

Myer argued a merger would have created a company better positioned to compete with a growing number of international retailers.

David Jones rejected the proposal, saying it did not represent fair value to shareholders.

However, speculation about a possible has continued, with some David Jones investors and fund managers suggesting a tie up between the two companies made sense.

Ad Feedback

- AAP

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content