Scrutiny over potential Aus retail merger

Last updated 09:48 11/02/2014

Relevant offers

World

Tori Johnson's final texts released in Lindt cafe siege inquest Weta Workshop adds new smaller models to profitable collectibles business What you need to know about the next recession (starring Donald Trump) Australia's rich list: Apartment developers make up the young guns Google Paris HQ raided in tax evasion probe 'It's the end of energy and transportation as we know it' - Tony Seba Area360 launches Ticketure, in a bid to disrupt the major ticketing companies Perth kebab shop server challenged to a wrestling match for a free falafel Bookshop forced to close after single complaint Ugg-ly legal battle shapes up as Australian boot maker fights to use 'ugg'

Australia's consumer watchdog says it would investigate the impact of a potential tie-up of David Jones and Myer on competition if the department store chains decided to pursue a merger.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission on Monday distanced itself from suggestions it would be unlikely to object to a possible merger between the two retailers, saying it had not formed a view on the issue.

"The ACCC wishes to make clear that it has formed no such view and it has provided no such indication, either formally or informally, to Myer or any other person," The ACCC said in a statement.

But it said it would launch a review of possible competition issues in the event the companies decided to merge.

"Should Myer or David Jones decide to pursue a merger the ACCC will then conduct a very thorough review, in accordance with its published guidelines, that would explore a range of potential competition issues."

David Jones revealed late last month it had received a merger proposal from Myer in October.

The A$3 billion ($3.2 billion) proposal would have effectively seen David Jones investors trade their shares for a stake in Myer, but with no premium offered.

Myer argued a merger would have created a company better positioned to compete with a growing number of international retailers.

David Jones rejected the proposal, saying it did not represent fair value to shareholders.

However, speculation about a possible has continued, with some David Jones investors and fund managers suggesting a tie up between the two companies made sense.

Ad Feedback

- AAP

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content