Capital next for Boobs on Bikes
Anti-porn parade to march ahead
Relevant offers
A judge's refusal to stop today's Auckland Boobs on Bikes parade will probably lead to more topless parades with a Wellington version already planned, porn king Steve Crow says.
In a judgment released yesterday Auckland District Court Judge Nicola Mathers rejected an Auckland City Council bid to get an interim injunction preventing the Queen St parade.
The judge said that though opponents may find the parade offensive or tasteless, the fact that 80,000 people attended meant a significant number did not agree.
After the ruling, Mr Crow accused the council of "running roughshod" over the rights of organisers and spectators by trying to stop the event, now in its sixth year.
"They're breasts," Mr Crow said. "And New Zealand law says that women can have their breasts out in public or be bare-chested just like a man."
Mr Crow confirmed plans for a topless bike parade through Wellington on November 7 in the lead-up to the capital's first Erotica Lifestyles Expo.
Wellington City Council had not yet been asked for consent, but the parade would go ahead regardless and would feature a topless Prime Minister Helen Clark look-alike, Mr Crow said. "The ruling supports this, it is a legal event."
At least one more parade is planned, in Christchurch next year. Wellington Mayor Kerry Prendergast said she was not aware of any "plans to turn the arts and culture capital into the boobs capital of New Zealand". The mayor's spokeswoman also said the parade was not in keeping with the city's reputation for arts and culture.
Councillors Stephanie Cook and Celia Wade-Brown agreed. "I don't really see it as a Wellington-type event," Ms Cook said.
Ms Wade-Brown said she was no prude but believed the parade was offensive to women and the capital's diverse ethnic groups. "It's a bit of a display that says a man's life is about motors and boobs."
The Auckland parade had been refused a permit from the council, but only bad weather would stop it going ahead, Mr Crow said.
About 30 women are expected to ride topless today, including a married Christchurch woman who was parading with her husband's blessing, Mr Crow said.
Auckland Mayor John Banks said the council had received about 1000 e-mails and 150 submissions opposing the event. Councillor Cathy Casey - who initiated the court bid - was threatening to lie in the parade's path to stop riders.
Police said yesterday they had no power of arrest for bylaw breaches, which is what parade organisers could be accused of.
Mr Crow has threatened to take a private prosecution against Ms Casey if she blocks the bikers.
Family First New Zealand director Bob McCoskrie today called for the Government to amend the Summary Offences Act and the Crimes Act to make topless parades illegal.
"It's time the law started protecting and putting the welfare of children and families first," Mr McCoskrie said.
"The current law is far too liberal and vague and needs to be amended."
He said there was concern over the inconsistency of the law with police stopping three women parading topless through Hamilton on Monday, but sanctioning up to 30 to do the same thing in Auckland today.
Auckland Women's Centre and Stop Demand Foundation have organised a concurrent march - which they say is not a protest - and have been granted a joint Auckland City Council permit to do so.
Stop Demand founder Denise Ritchie said both groups would direct their message to the thousands of porn users that would be downtown and to the wider public, that pornography fuels sexual violence against women and children.
Ms Ritchie said sexual violence was estimated to cost the New Zealand economy $1.2 billion, $827 million being the loss of quality of life for victims, across an estimated 16,500 sex offences.
New Zealand's chief censor, pornography investigators and global research were unanimous in reporting hard core pornography, which made up the bulk of Mr Crow's commercial interests and profits, was increasingly cruel, misogynistic and degrading of women, she said.
"Female porn stars are paid big money to simulate scenes of rape, sexual violation and degradation for the purposes of male sexual arousal and gratification."
The group's main message is that sexual violence does not take place in a vacuum, she said.
"It is underpinned by attitudes and messages, many of which are fuelled and normalised by the hard core porn industry.
"In New Zealand, that fueller is self-proclaimed porn king Steve Crow."
The Pornography and Sexual Violence demonstration will march a short distance ahead of Mr Crow's parade and police will be in attendance.
- with NZPA
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
I'm sorry I don't think this is a religious thing. This is about standards and the safety of our women and females of this country. Steve Crow is exploiting these women and showing that this is all women are good for, which is wrong. As a father of 3 daughters I do not want them growing up thinking they are only good for one thing, that boys will only want to go with them for one thing. Porngraphy is becoming too regularly available in this country and is destroying the minds of men. How would men feel if a parade show completey naked men walking down the street, you would probably find that all the women would keep shopping and the men would be at work. This boobs on bikes is tasteless and Mr. Crows empire would crumble if stood to idiots like him. One more thing I would like to add, it would only be time until we think that child porn is okay and then we wonder how the heck do we get here. We need to put a stop to things now before they get out of hand.
Ian G - I agree with your comments and, sadly, I think the Judge was actually a woman. What is New Zealand coming to, I ask myself?
See my reply to Paul G - this applies to you, as well.
It's odd, isnt it, that those "men" (and I question whether they are REAL men) who have written comments in support of this parade have all made very rude, crude or insulting remarks. Their words speak volumes about their code of values, which appear to be sadly lacking. So understandably they havent the brains to work out why people like Bob McCoskrie of Family First are so opposed to this parade going ahead. They just dont "get it" do they, that Steven Crow is promoting something that can definitely be connected with the high rate of sexual violence,child abuse and violent crime in this country and, sadly, are probably typical of the men who see nothing wrong in this kind of display. I can only presume they arent married or have children - but if they are, I pity their wives and/or children, being related to such poor examples.
If a woman can't trust his guy enough for him to see a pair of tits, then she has strong sense of insecurity. it's not like the public gets to go up and feel those tits unless the girl givces permission. the women who display themselves chose to be there not forced. Family first should worry more about domestic violence and rapes rather than a couple minute worth of peep at a set of tits which every women owns regardless of sizes.
Passage John 3:36: 36 And anyone who believes in God's Son has eternal life. Anyone who doesn't obey the Son will never experience eternal life but remains under God's angry judgment
Wellington has an opportunity here, by saying 'no'. That will leave Auckland as the undisputed 'porn capital' of NZ. Is there no dignity left in this nation? How can we shame porn viewers, yet condone 'boob' parades? Don't listen to the judge: he's just a modern day 'Pontius Pilate' and supports the concept of 'relativism', deeply rooted in today's NZ society. This is an inappropriate activity for a capital city, nowadays being monitored overseas, too. If a parade goes ahead, Chch is looking increasingly like the most favoured destination for visitors to NZ. And Wellington will have even less to commend it.
I think that New Zealand is not ready for this type of exhibitonism yet. Most people don't consider it appropriate for women to appear topless in public and I'm certain that if asked and the answer was truthful - most men would be horrified if their partner did so.
The only places I have seen topless women is on beaches and at resorts when I have been overseas and then it is usually done in a discreet manner. I know that it does occur in NZ but I have never seen it yet.
I wonder what percentage of those that go to view the parade are male, and of those, how many of them have considered how their partners may feel about them ogling at half naked women?
I also wonder why people are arrested for streaking topless at public events, yet it is ok for a parade of topless females to wind its way through the city?
Just because it may be legal for the Boobs on Bikes parade to happen, does that mean it is right?
Why don't they replace the topless girls with Mayor Banks, Members of the National Party, and Family First, and call them 'Right Boobs on Bikes.'
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
Bus changes raise fears in suburbs
Police access Facebook in Wellington murder investigation
Concerns for missing Featherston woman
Governor General's concert draws thousands
Top skateboarders shred in Wellington
Scorching Bay death now a matter for coroner
Police search for missing Featherston woman
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
A burning issue: When coffins get too big
Tension high as lethal log pile cleared
Victim was holding bat, says witness
Engineer's report prompts mall evacuation
One dead after Hawke's Bay crash
Uzbek pleads guilty to Obama kill plot
Gardener's paradise planned for Chch
Danny Lee drops back at Pebble Beach
Obama tries to defuse birth control fight
Police recapture Madonna stalker
Promoter dismisses bike helmet harm study
Will bill make food safer or be a form of control?
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
EU courts Kiwis for science grants
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
Police access Facebook in Wellington murder investigation
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
Helmet law halves cyclist numbers
Bus changes raise fears in suburbs
Lloyd Morrison: Leader of the pack
Helmet law halves cyclist numbers
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
Promoter dismisses bike helmet harm study
Hurricanes game set to be a rural rugby spectacle
Bus changes raise fears in suburbs
Search for oil, gas may near Wellington
• Story ideas: Email or call 0800 366 7678
• Website ideas: Email or tweet us
• Place an ad: Email or call 04 474 0000
• Subscribe: Email or call 0800 50 50 90
• No paper: Call 0800 50 50 90
• Start or stop your paper
• Buy a photo
• View the Digital Edition
• Make dompost.co.nz your homepage

Newest First
Oldest First
Should bicycle helmets be mandatory?









What I don't understand is why there are many arguments against this parade but no one seems to see the main point which is that it is an advertisement for the adult industry, which whether you agree with it or not, should not be held at a time and place where children may be walking from school just as advertisements for the industry aren't allowed to be screened on tv at times children are watching. Surely the issue for or against the parade is as simple as this!