Psychic TV called 'exploitainment'
The Dominion Post
Relevant offers
A Kiwi sceptic has labelled shows such as Sensing Murder "exploitainment" that takes advantage of grieving families while bolstering the income of so-called psychics.
As part of the show that screens on Tuesday, police investigating the suspected murder of retired Wellington woman Kaye Stewart, 62, turned to television psychics Deb Webber and Kelvin Cruickshank to uncover new leads.
Though they identified the area where Mrs Stewart was believed to have disappeared in the Rimutaka Forest Park in 2005 and unearthed the name of someone known to the inquiry, Detective Senior Sergeant Ross Levy said it had not resulted in any fresh leads.
Since both mediums had previous involvement with the Stewart family, Skeptics Society head Vicki Hyde said there was no way they could claim the information came from the dead.
Ms Hyde said Sensing Murder – which attracts more than 600,000 viewers – and its overseas variants had never led to a murder being solved.
"It exploits grieving and vulnerable families and adds to the psychic's marketing potential. It's ethically distasteful," she said.
Police were normally suspicious of psychic powers but welcomed the raised public awareness that the show offered.
Ms Hyde said the reconstructions in the show may jog witnesses' memories but the ends did not justify the means.
Sensing Murder associate producer Cinna Smith denied the show was exploitative and said it had received no complaints from victims' families. Its policy was to feature cases only where a family had contacted the show.
Up to 60 more families were wanting their case highlighted.
"Some families want to know that their loved ones live on but most just want to get the information out there. We're not promising the world."
Sponsored links
Physical laws (ie, laws of Physics) alone eliminates the existence capabilities claimed by psychics or its proponents. I wrote a comment on it on NZ Reality TV web site (http://www.nzrealitytv.com/2007/09/physicist-says-psychics-are-bunk.html) about a year ago.
I know at least two of the stories are real, although they are totally hyped up and glossed over.
Originally, after seeing an episode which dealt with the death of a friend of mine, I thought it was total rubbish. Everything that was said on the episode was things that the media had said many years prior to her disappearance. Also, it isn't hard to talk to any of her friends and family about what actually happened.
To be honest, I still think the show is trashy, but for some families, this is a form of closure. I think it also may be good to trigger someone's memory, where at the time they may have been present, and seen something but didn't think anything of it then. And if there is even the slightest hope that at least one of these cases may be solved from the assistance of a passer by from the recreation, how can that be bad for grieving families?
One other thing that just came to mind is, maybe the person/s who commited these crimes might have changed and grown a conscience over time, and might (by some miracle) come forward and hand themselves in. I know this is highly unlikely, but stranger things have happened.
Ms Hyde is the one with all the red herrings. Provide evidence of families that have complained. The one family I know of from this series was nothing but grateful for the information that the psychics supplied. I suggest she might like to go talk to them directly instead of commenting for them without consulting them. Oh but I forgot they are silly and vunerable and you know best! Wrong they are intelligent and strong and they are in the best position to form an opinion on the information provided. And yes they did provide items of personal information that they couldn't have known.
I like the series of Sensing Murder too, but I do not believe that they are real live stories, for you never see any such results or answers. They are pretty good as "stories" go - but I do not think that they are "real"!
Kiwi Kevin Percy claims Harry Potter castle
Buy your furniture or we'll sell it Crown tells ministers
Griffin's moves biscuits to Fiji
Wellington mayor's husband threatens mall libel suit
School building gutted by fire
Chemical leak disrupts Wellington Hospital
Truck driver sentenced over policeman's death
Bitter MP seeks reconciliation
Police dob in drink driver to Air NZ
Lawyer backs down over drink-drive website
All Blacks level with England at halftime
Triple treat cashes up ailing NZRU
Sleepwalker found not guilty of wife's death
World Cup party's over for Phoenix
Oprah says ending show 'feels right'
Police officer killed as floods devastate UK
Miley Cyrus tour bus overturns, one dead
European football match-fixing ring exposed
Wellington mayor's husband threatens mall libel suit
Kiwi Kevin Percy claims Harry Potter castle
Griffin's moves biscuits to Fiji
Buy your furniture or we'll sell it Crown tells ministers
Heavenly movie tests Jackson to the limit
Deaths of pregnant women 'preventable'
Should Manners Mall make way for buses?
Related story: Mall campaign pays for 'protesters'
Newest First
Oldest First
"I suggest she might like to go talk to them directly instead of commenting for them without consulting them."
Deb Webber had openly denied to go on radio show with Ms Hyde, because she claims that it would ruin her pychic powers.
"And yes they did provide items of personal information that they couldn't have known" If they have actual "powers" then why do the producers refuse to put them through independent scientific testing. You know the ones where they repeat the test over and over again to eliminate the possibility of "chance".
Gee I wonder why? Maybe it could be that she doesn't have powers. Eating Media Lunch did a really good expose on them
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2zSRAjjjE8