$50 tax on crime for victim support

All convicted criminals must contribute

Last updated 22:40 18/01/2009

Relevant offers

National News

Shining light on a viable alternative Kiwi trainer top dog of screen Internet law change 'unjust' Tribute for 'forgotten' service Cricket to crack down on chuckers Six-week wait for Barlow verdict Waiting on lords' word Lieutenant-Colonel demoted after indecent assault Barlows wait for Privy Council news Army officer guilty of indecency

Every person convicted in court will have to pay a $50 crime tax toward compensating victims under a proposed law to be introduced by National.

The victim compensation scheme will offer one-off payments to victims of serious crime to cover costs not met by ACC or other state help, such as counselling or travel to court.

Every offender who appears in court, from traffic violators to murderers, will be fined $50 upon conviction estimated to collect about $5 million a year.

National says the money would be collected the same way as court costs and fines imposed at sentencing adding little extra administrative costs and would not be collected till any direct reparations which had been ordered had been paid to the victim.

Victims' advocates have welcomed the move, saying victims often face huge bills for funerals and the cost of travel to and from court.

Kevin McNeill, whose mother, Lois Dear, was murdered in her Tokoroa schoolroom in July 2006, estimated his family had spent about $30,000 after Mrs Dear's death, including the $10,000 funeral and travel costs to attend the killer's court appearances.

"When something like this happens, we're just medium New Zealanders, and when you haven't got a lot and you've got to fork out a lot in a short amount of time, that's where the victim compensation scheme will come out and help people in need," he said. "I reckon it's brilliant."

Sensible Sentencing Trust spokesman Garth McVicar also welcomed the scheme. "It's fantastic to see that we're putting victims straight in the centre of the whole process."

Last week Justice Minister Simon Power promised the $90,000 running costs from a disbanded sentencing advisory board would go toward the scheme.

Also, any compensation paid to prisoners for human rights breaches in jail will be confiscated and injected into the compensation scheme, as long as it is not claimed by the specific victims of the offender.

National plans to set up a victims' service centre within the Justice Ministry to manage the compensation scheme.

Maori Party co-leader Tariana Turia said she supported the idea in principle.

"It is a crime tax. There's part of me that doesn't disagree with that if it's going to go to those most affected." But low-level offenders might end up subsidising the fund for serious offenders sentenced to jail who would be unlikely to pay the levy. "They [minor offenders] are then paying for those at the high end of crime ... which seems rather unfair."

Ad Feedback

Opposition justice spokeswoman Annette King said the scheme was a "pure piece of political theatre" that would do little for victims. "If that's all they're offering, then they're really selling the victims a lemon.

"The question must be who's going to get it?," she said. "It's going to be hugely bureaucratic and I'll be interested to know how many more public servants they're going to need to run it."

Labour had asked the Law Commission to look at how to set up proper victim compensation schemes and that work was continuing.

Mr Power rejected Ms King's view that the scheme would be expensive to run and said the courts should be able to add the levy at little extra cost.

Legislation will be tabled next month.

- © Fairfax NZ News

8 comments
Raju Sharma   #8   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

The reason we have to have such a thing in NZ is because unlike the rest of the free World victims can not sue for damages. Its time the right to sue was brought back to NZ.

Roger Brooking   #7   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Since nearly 90% of all offending occurs under the influence of alcohol (and other drugs), how about imposing a fine on the liquor industry for every crime that is committed under the influence of alcohol.

At least the breweries and wineries would have the money to pay the fine, and it would be far easier to collect off them than an offender who is probably on the benefit anyway.

This would send also a message to the liquor industry that they too must bear some responsibility for selling a product which kills 1,000 Kiwis a year and contributes to the creation of so many other victims in society.

Craig Dempsey   #6   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

The $50.00 crime tax for traffic infringement ie speeding who gets the $50.00 the government is this just another revenue gathering exercise?

Dave   #5   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

It's a good policy. It heads things in the right direction - i.e. towards personal responsibility. It's a very modest step that is easily implemented. Hopefully this is just the thin edge of the wedge to bring about restorative justice. Even if it never gets that far at least it signals a reversal of the Labour/Greens socialist nanny state.

alex shewan   #4   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Now I think I've got this straight.If I smoke pot, get caught, go to court and get fined, I must pay an extra $50 to victims.Since the only possible victim I can see in me smoking pot is me, do I get my money back?

Socialist Craig   #3   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Lets face it, Simon Power Gone to the Head, this is just another Tory bribe. Why was not a weekly compensation from the offender to the victim implemented years ago?

Stuart P Lewis   #2   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

What a panacea to political bandwagons. Ignoring the obvious facts - When does a fine become a tax, how many layers of 'fines' can be levied upon an offender. Will the offender receive an invoice clarifying the various fines, levies and GST content of their sentencing? Additionally, with the inability of the Courts Department to recover 'real' fines and penalties already imposed by the judiciary, it must surely be obvious to even Gareth McVicar that the value of the reparations received will be far outweighed by the costs of administering this newly proposed 'cunning plan'. Like all such schemes, the cost will ultimately be borne by the offender's family thereby exacerbating the cycle of offending.

Peter Miller   #1   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

$50 tax on crime. $5M won't go far - but it will help some victims a bit and that is good. It won't help victim agencies who can often use the money more effectively - organisasions such as Wellington Sexual Abuse Help or Rape Crisis. And the government will not be able to collect money from people convicted of serious offenses or all those people who cannot or do not pay their fines. It looks like just a wee bit more window dressing by the new government.

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content