$50 tax on crime for victim support
All convicted criminals must contribute
Relevant offers
National News
Every person convicted in court will have to pay a $50 crime tax toward compensating victims under a proposed law to be introduced by National.
The victim compensation scheme will offer one-off payments to victims of serious crime to cover costs not met by ACC or other state help, such as counselling or travel to court.
Every offender who appears in court, from traffic violators to murderers, will be fined $50 upon conviction estimated to collect about $5 million a year.
National says the money would be collected the same way as court costs and fines imposed at sentencing adding little extra administrative costs and would not be collected till any direct reparations which had been ordered had been paid to the victim.
Victims' advocates have welcomed the move, saying victims often face huge bills for funerals and the cost of travel to and from court.
Kevin McNeill, whose mother, Lois Dear, was murdered in her Tokoroa schoolroom in July 2006, estimated his family had spent about $30,000 after Mrs Dear's death, including the $10,000 funeral and travel costs to attend the killer's court appearances.
"When something like this happens, we're just medium New Zealanders, and when you haven't got a lot and you've got to fork out a lot in a short amount of time, that's where the victim compensation scheme will come out and help people in need," he said. "I reckon it's brilliant."
Sensible Sentencing Trust spokesman Garth McVicar also welcomed the scheme. "It's fantastic to see that we're putting victims straight in the centre of the whole process."
Last week Justice Minister Simon Power promised the $90,000 running costs from a disbanded sentencing advisory board would go toward the scheme.
Also, any compensation paid to prisoners for human rights breaches in jail will be confiscated and injected into the compensation scheme, as long as it is not claimed by the specific victims of the offender.
National plans to set up a victims' service centre within the Justice Ministry to manage the compensation scheme.
Maori Party co-leader Tariana Turia said she supported the idea in principle.
"It is a crime tax. There's part of me that doesn't disagree with that if it's going to go to those most affected." But low-level offenders might end up subsidising the fund for serious offenders sentenced to jail who would be unlikely to pay the levy. "They [minor offenders] are then paying for those at the high end of crime ... which seems rather unfair."
Opposition justice spokeswoman Annette King said the scheme was a "pure piece of political theatre" that would do little for victims. "If that's all they're offering, then they're really selling the victims a lemon.
"The question must be who's going to get it?," she said. "It's going to be hugely bureaucratic and I'll be interested to know how many more public servants they're going to need to run it."
Labour had asked the Law Commission to look at how to set up proper victim compensation schemes and that work was continuing.
Mr Power rejected Ms King's view that the scheme would be expensive to run and said the courts should be able to add the levy at little extra cost.
Legislation will be tabled next month.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Since nearly 90% of all offending occurs under the influence of alcohol (and other drugs), how about imposing a fine on the liquor industry for every crime that is committed under the influence of alcohol.
At least the breweries and wineries would have the money to pay the fine, and it would be far easier to collect off them than an offender who is probably on the benefit anyway.
This would send also a message to the liquor industry that they too must bear some responsibility for selling a product which kills 1,000 Kiwis a year and contributes to the creation of so many other victims in society.
The $50.00 crime tax for traffic infringement ie speeding who gets the $50.00 the government is this just another revenue gathering exercise?
It's a good policy. It heads things in the right direction - i.e. towards personal responsibility. It's a very modest step that is easily implemented. Hopefully this is just the thin edge of the wedge to bring about restorative justice. Even if it never gets that far at least it signals a reversal of the Labour/Greens socialist nanny state.
Now I think I've got this straight.If I smoke pot, get caught, go to court and get fined, I must pay an extra $50 to victims.Since the only possible victim I can see in me smoking pot is me, do I get my money back?
Lets face it, Simon Power Gone to the Head, this is just another Tory bribe. Why was not a weekly compensation from the offender to the victim implemented years ago?
What a panacea to political bandwagons. Ignoring the obvious facts - When does a fine become a tax, how many layers of 'fines' can be levied upon an offender. Will the offender receive an invoice clarifying the various fines, levies and GST content of their sentencing? Additionally, with the inability of the Courts Department to recover 'real' fines and penalties already imposed by the judiciary, it must surely be obvious to even Gareth McVicar that the value of the reparations received will be far outweighed by the costs of administering this newly proposed 'cunning plan'. Like all such schemes, the cost will ultimately be borne by the offender's family thereby exacerbating the cycle of offending.
$50 tax on crime. $5M won't go far - but it will help some victims a bit and that is good. It won't help victim agencies who can often use the money more effectively - organisasions such as Wellington Sexual Abuse Help or Rape Crisis. And the government will not be able to collect money from people convicted of serious offenses or all those people who cannot or do not pay their fines. It looks like just a wee bit more window dressing by the new government.
Hundreds of unfit teachers in class
Mayor wants panel to set pay rises
Transmission Gully ruling waits upon five wise heads
Mystery deepens over Smith's start for Hurricanes
State of economy top of Kiwis' concerns
Volunteers fight fires in a truck that won't stop
Prison staff caught using work internet to view porn
Aussie tribunal blocks bid to deport outcast Kiwi prisoner
Phoenix lose game and second place to Roar
Glass crashes down from Terrace building
Hundreds of unfit teachers in class
Urewera four trial set to kick off
Brown's tearful Whitney tribute
Jonah Lomu seeking new kidney donor
Kiwi jailed in Australia wins appeal
Luis Suarez apologises for no handshake
Wales outclass Scotland 27-13 in Cardiff
Logging truck crash closes SH2
Prison staff use work internet to view porn
Search scaled down for Huntly boy
NZ sharemarket: Mixed earnings season expected
Herbert baffled as yellow cards fly for Phoenix
Last-gasp goals cost Kiwis huge upset in US
Hundreds of unfit teachers in class
Mystery deepens over Smith's start for Hurricanes
Wellington woman found safe in motel
NZ, mate, you might have a drinking problem
Transmission Gully ruling waits upon five wise heads
Volunteers fight fires in a truck that won't stop
Glass crashes down from Terrace building
Ethnic rights advice stuns communities
Making your education investment pay
NZ, mate, you might have a drinking problem
Prime Minister John Key wins hearts if not minds
Editorial: Adding value to our national days
Debate heats up on national rates rebate
Mayor wants panel to set pay rises
Newest First
Oldest First
The reason we have to have such a thing in NZ is because unlike the rest of the free World victims can not sue for damages. Its time the right to sue was brought back to NZ.