It's time for the tide to turn on the waterfront
BY HELENE RITCHIE
Relevant offers
Comment
OPINION: Wellington's waterfront, our "meeting place", is great.
Wellingtonians and visitors of every creed, class, race and culture gather there to enjoy their leisure, and have done so in increasing numbers over the past decade.
We love it. It gives us our sense of place, pride and open space - harbour, hills, sun and sky.
"The waterfront is and should remain distinctly 'Wellington'," says the council's waterfront policy. "It is a place where Wellingtonians can experience the things that are so uniquely Wellington - the wind, the harbour, the form of the city."
But despite this, a wall of big bulky buildings is being planned by the mayor and council. The waterfront still remains under significant threat.
In the 1980s, the harbour board gifted land to Wellington City Council in trust. But much of that land has been, and is planned to be, subdivided by stealth and sold to private interests. Huge chunks of waterfront land, heritage views, sun, skyline, open and recreational/leisure space, will be lost if the council's plans come to fruition.
Wellington City Council, as kaitiaki/ guardian, has been entrusted with this land, to act on behalf of and in the interests of the people of Wellington.
But right now, despite talk of ice rinks and campervan sites, the council has plans to turn public open space into a wall of big high buildings: on Chaffers, to replace the highly successful Chaffers market; three near Waitangi Park, blocking views of the Mt Victoria/St Gerard's/Clyde Quay historic boat sheds, and three on Kumototo, near the railway station.
There's Frank Kitts Park as well, planned to be cut in half and flattened.
Before any further buildings rob the public of their land and assets, there should be a full investigation into past deals, subdivision and sale of the gifted harbour board land to date. What exactly has happened to it? Who has benefitted? At what public cost? Why has the council done this? How? Some examples are:
* The New World site: sold
* Greta Pt: sold
* The Meridian Building land: sold - 125-year lease
* Shell Building (former Retail Centre): sold - 999-year lease
* Overseas Passenger wharf and heritage building: sold - 125-year lease
* Attempted sale: Wellington's prime site - the Outer T: defeated in court
The council's 2001 waterfront policy says unequivocally: "The waterfront is predominantly a public place, a place owned by all Wellingtonians . . ." But this fundamental value of collective ownership has been and is being violated by the council. Instead, the council's mighty resources have, since the early 90s, repeatedly borne down on the collective will of the people to take big chunks of this priceless asset from them.
The specious argument to justify this theft has been that these big buildings will provide funds for the open space. But the open space is there already - ratepayers have long funded improvements to it.
This is and always has been a ruse; a nonsense. Any investigation into waterfront funding over 20 years would readily show that no evidence exists of an immediate or long-term financial return to the people. Quite the reverse.
The waterfront company is in a parlous financial state because the priorities for expenditure have simply been wrong.
Further, there is evidence of subdivision without public consultation, enabling sales such as the Overseas Passenger Terminal one to go ahead on the grounds that: "It is considered that there will be no person adversely affected by this subdivision." Clearly, this is quite wrong, and an outrageous abuse of the law.
Wellingtonians - thousands affected by this loss - never had a say. Instead developers and private interests gained significantly.
But in any case, the waterfront is priceless. Just as the town belt was protected in perpetuity by those with foresight for our city, what waterfront land remains should now also be protected. I have sought that since the early 1980s.
In 2001, the successful resolution that I put to that effect was supported by a town hall packed with a public outraged about the council's wall of buildings - Variation 17.
They endorsed the resolution to protect the public open space. As the longest- serving councillor, I have never experienced a more passionate or larger public meeting on any one Wellington issue.
This pivotal decision in the capital was a very clear expression of the will of the people of Wellington.
But, a decade later, today, the council is again proposing to fast-track a wall of buildings with Variation 11.
Now it really is time to save the waterfront for future generations, and to let the tide turn completely.
* Helene Ritchie is a Wellington city councillor
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
The city must move forward and not stagnate. The harbour is one of the most beautiful in the world. Any developments should be of a low rise variety to not restrict the views that others have of the water. Blocking out the views brings the overall city standard to the same level as any mundane metropolis overseas. Being able to walk and appreciate the waterfront is a luxury Wellington has compared to many other cities and should not ever be restricted.
Why does Helene Ritchie get some much say on the waterfront?
The development of the waterfront has been fantastic and should continue without delay. The "do nothing" noisy minority should focus their minds on what the waterfront was like as a tarmac for car parking. Even three years ago the Meridian site was a car park and is now an area attracting a considerable number of visitors and Wellingtonians alike - the Meridian building and surrounding public space are evidence of excellent development for all to use.
For Helene to say there is not enough consultation is laughable. The process required to get any development is considerable. The ideas competition for the Outer T is to be applauded - the sooner this old shed and the Overseas Passenger Terminal are redeveloped the better.
Buildings were proposed for surrounding (and complementing) Waitangi Park but I have not read the market will be moving. More negativity!
Let's focus on the postivities of a great future waterfront.
Thanks Helene,
You worked very hard towards saving this precious jewel and still do as is evident by this letter well done.
Special thanks to all members of Waterfront Watch with Pauline Swann as its president who has worked tirelessly to the point of exhaustion to persue her dedication to the waterfornt on behalf of Wellington.
The City is Ours is working equally as hard to Save Manners Mall and has done so since Decmeber 2008. An Open Space Design competition for Manners Mall has been announced as a $ 1.5 million budget is still attached to the site while it awaits legal revocation. This competition is open to all design students of Victoria and Massey University and excludes WCC employees from entering. Details of the competition will be made available at the end of September.
$AVE MANNERS MALL $AVE 11 MILLION!
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
Bus changes raise fears in suburbs
Police access Facebook in Wellington murder investigation
Concerns for missing Featherston woman
Top skateboarders shred in Wellington
Scorching Bay death now a matter for coroner
Police search for missing Featherston woman
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
A burning issue: When coffins get too big
Promoter dismisses bike helmet harm study
Tension high as lethal log pile cleared
Victim was holding bat, says witness
Engineer's report prompts mall evacuation
One dead after Hawke's Bay crash
Man missing after Harbour Bridge fall
Danny Lee drops back at Pebble Beach
Obama tries to defuse birth control fight
Police recapture Madonna stalker
Promoter dismisses bike helmet harm study
Will bill make food safer or be a form of control?
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
EU courts Kiwis for science grants
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
Police access Facebook in Wellington murder investigation
Helmet law halves cyclist numbers
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
Lloyd Morrison: Leader of the pack
Both islands rattled by quakes overnight
Helmet law halves cyclist numbers
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
Promoter dismisses bike helmet harm study
Hurricanes game set to be a rural rugby spectacle
Sorry Britain, to have offended you with our drinking
All Wellington bus routes to change
$1m jump in MPs' travel at election time
Newest First
Oldest First
Should bicycle helmets be mandatory?
As a regular visitor to Wellington from Australia for over 20 years, I am appalled that Wellington Council would even consider depriving the people of the city from access to the waterfront. Port Nicholson is Wellington's best asset. To be able to wander from the city centre and be standing on the waterfront in just a matter of minutes is something few other cities can offer. Yes Wellington does need to be move forward and the waterfront needs to be developed. Building high rise buildings is an idea from last century. Develop it as open green space, with a camper van park, a skating rink and as a place for the residents and visitors to enjoy. Fight to save your waterfront Wellington, please.