It's time for the tide to turn on the waterfront

BY HELENE RITCHIE
Last updated 08:28 04/09/2009
Waterfront
ALL AT RISK: Waterfront land, heritage views, sun, skyline and leisure space will be lost if Wellington City Council's plans come to fruition, Helen Ritchie argues.

Relevant offers

Comment

Editorial: Wellington's waterfront is a gem Sean Plunket: A holiday at Lyall Bay Editorial: Family reunions - who should pay? Trade talks vital, but benefits vague Sorry Britain, to have offended you with our drinking Regifting is not just ok, it's great Does David Shearer want to be Tony Blair? Editorial: Veto protects Syria's blood-stained leader It's the Halbergs: Let the debate begin Why are our children so badly behaved?

OPINION: Wellington's waterfront, our "meeting place", is great.

Wellingtonians and visitors of  every creed, class, race and culture gather there to enjoy their leisure,  and have done so in increasing numbers  over the past decade.

We love it. It gives us our sense of place, pride and open space - harbour, hills, sun and sky.

"The waterfront is and should remain distinctly 'Wellington'," says the council's waterfront policy. "It is a place where Wellingtonians can experience the things that are so uniquely Wellington - the wind, the harbour, the form of the city."

But despite this, a wall of big bulky buildings is being planned by the mayor and council. The waterfront still remains under significant threat.

In the 1980s, the harbour board gifted land to Wellington City Council in trust. But much of that land has been, and is planned to be, subdivided by stealth and sold to private interests. Huge chunks of waterfront land, heritage views, sun, skyline, open and recreational/leisure space, will be lost if the council's plans come to fruition.

Wellington City Council, as kaitiaki/ guardian, has been entrusted with this land, to act on behalf of and in the interests of the people of Wellington.

But right now, despite talk of ice rinks and campervan sites, the council has plans to turn public open space into a wall of big high buildings: on Chaffers, to replace the highly successful Chaffers market; three near Waitangi Park, blocking views of the Mt Victoria/St Gerard's/Clyde Quay historic boat sheds, and three on Kumototo, near the railway station.

There's Frank Kitts Park as well, planned to be cut in half and flattened.

Before any further buildings rob the public of their land and assets, there should be a full investigation into past deals, subdivision and sale of the gifted harbour board land to date. What exactly has happened to it? Who has benefitted? At what public cost? Why has the council done this? How? Some examples are:

* The New World site: sold

* Greta Pt: sold

* The Meridian Building land: sold - 125-year lease

* Shell Building (former Retail Centre): sold - 999-year lease

* Overseas Passenger wharf and heritage building: sold - 125-year lease

* Attempted sale: Wellington's prime site - the Outer T: defeated in court

The council's 2001 waterfront policy says unequivocally: "The waterfront is predominantly a public place, a place owned by all Wellingtonians . . ." But this fundamental value of collective ownership has been and is being violated by the council. Instead, the council's mighty resources have, since the early 90s, repeatedly borne down on the collective will of the people to take big chunks of this priceless asset from them.

Ad Feedback

The specious argument to justify this theft has been that these big buildings will provide funds for the open space. But the open space is there already - ratepayers have long funded improvements to it.

This is and always has been a ruse; a nonsense. Any investigation into waterfront funding over 20 years would readily show that no evidence exists of an immediate or long-term financial return to the people. Quite the reverse.

The waterfront company is in a parlous financial state because the priorities for expenditure have simply been wrong.

Further, there is evidence of subdivision without public consultation, enabling sales such as the Overseas Passenger Terminal one to go ahead on the grounds that: "It is considered that there will be no person adversely affected by this subdivision." Clearly, this is quite wrong, and an outrageous abuse of the law.

Wellingtonians - thousands affected by this loss - never had a say. Instead developers and private interests gained significantly.

But in any case, the waterfront is priceless. Just as the town belt was protected in perpetuity by those with foresight for our city, what waterfront land remains should now also be protected. I have sought that since the early 1980s.

In 2001, the successful resolution that I put to that effect was supported by a town hall packed with a public outraged about the council's wall of buildings - Variation 17.

They endorsed the resolution to protect the public open space. As the longest- serving councillor, I have never experienced a more passionate or larger public meeting on any one Wellington issue.

This pivotal decision in the capital was a very clear expression of the will of the people of Wellington.

But, a decade later, today, the council is again proposing to fast-track a wall of buildings with Variation 11.

Now it really is time to save the waterfront for future generations, and to let the tide turn completely.

* Helene Ritchie is a Wellington city councillor

- © Fairfax NZ News

4 comments
Post a comment
Dom   #4   10:02 pm Sep 05 2009

As a regular visitor to Wellington from Australia for over 20 years, I am appalled that Wellington Council would even consider depriving the people of the city from access to the waterfront. Port Nicholson is Wellington's best asset. To be able to wander from the city centre and be standing on the waterfront in just a matter of minutes is something few other cities can offer. Yes Wellington does need to be move forward and the waterfront needs to be developed. Building high rise buildings is an idea from last century. Develop it as open green space, with a camper van park, a skating rink and as a place for the residents and visitors to enjoy. Fight to save your waterfront Wellington, please.

moving forward   #3   04:35 pm Sep 05 2009

The city must move forward and not stagnate. The harbour is one of the most beautiful in the world. Any developments should be of a low rise variety to not restrict the views that others have of the water. Blocking out the views brings the overall city standard to the same level as any mundane metropolis overseas. Being able to walk and appreciate the waterfront is a luxury Wellington has compared to many other cities and should not ever be restricted.

Wgtn_4_Ever   #2   02:35 pm Sep 04 2009

Why does Helene Ritchie get some much say on the waterfront?

The development of the waterfront has been fantastic and should continue without delay. The "do nothing" noisy minority should focus their minds on what the waterfront was like as a tarmac for car parking. Even three years ago the Meridian site was a car park and is now an area attracting a considerable number of visitors and Wellingtonians alike - the Meridian building and surrounding public space are evidence of excellent development for all to use.

For Helene to say there is not enough consultation is laughable. The process required to get any development is considerable. The ideas competition for the Outer T is to be applauded - the sooner this old shed and the Overseas Passenger Terminal are redeveloped the better.

Buildings were proposed for surrounding (and complementing) Waitangi Park but I have not read the market will be moving. More negativity!

Let's focus on the postivities of a great future waterfront.

the City is Ours   #1   10:24 am Sep 04 2009

Thanks Helene,

You worked very hard towards saving this precious jewel and still do as is evident by this letter well done.

Special thanks to all members of Waterfront Watch with Pauline Swann as its president who has worked tirelessly to the point of exhaustion to persue her dedication to the waterfornt on behalf of Wellington.

The City is Ours is working equally as hard to Save Manners Mall and has done so since Decmeber 2008. An Open Space Design competition for Manners Mall has been announced as a $ 1.5 million budget is still attached to the site while it awaits legal revocation. This competition is open to all design students of Victoria and Massey University and excludes WCC employees from entering. Details of the competition will be made available at the end of September.

$AVE MANNERS MALL $AVE 11 MILLION!

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bicycle helmets be mandatory?

Yes- They save lives and prevent injury

Yes- But only for children

No - It is a personal choice

I don’t care

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content