NZ needs a prick of conscience over national health disgrace

Last updated 08:01 27/01/2010

Relevant offers

Comment

How Gareth got me to support the Phoenix Editorial: Clock ticking on Christchurch mayor Editorial: Don't let drunks spoil Sevens fun Overkill, bedevilment in Food Bill Our hands were tied over the Crafar farms sale Editorial: Euro clouds Key's sunny optimism A megaupload of Dotcom's money would help Government passes the buck on charter schools Labour tangled in foreign farm sales Editorial: Opposition to sale has whiff of racism

OPINION: Parliament's health select committee is about to begin an inquiry into children's immunisation rates. Committee chairman and National MP Paul Hutchison, a doctor, explains why.

New Zealand's failure to achieve anywhere near a 95 per cent completion rate for children's immunisations is a national disgrace that must be remedied. This inquiry specifically does not seek to make immunisation compulsory. There must be room for those who object (about 5 per cent).

For years New Zealand's completion rates have been far lower than in many other developed and undeveloped countries (which have completion rates up to 95 per cent), and there are significant inequities for many of our most vulnerable children (Maori uptake in Auckland and Counties Manukau is 64 per cent).

Completion rates of immunisation for children over four years of age is not known. That is shocking. For those under two years, the completion rate is about 76 per cent.

Pacific countries where I have personally worked are reported to have far better rates than New Zealand.

This poor record, despite our advantages, is partly a result of a poor focus on public health over a long period of time and partly a result of parental apathy and misunderstanding. Many New Zealand children unnecessarily suffer preventable diseases such as measles, whooping cough, pneumococcal pneumonia and other relatively common infectious diseases, despite immunisation being available at no charge. The mortality and related co-morbidity is high and could be prevented.

There is clear scientific evidence that the benefits of high levels of immunisation to the individual and to society far outweigh the disadvantages (very rare, but sometimes severe, side-effects).

Vaccines work by stimulating the immune system to develop antibodies to combat infections without the recipient suffering from the disease itself. The aim of vaccination is to offer protection to the recipient, who therefore becomes less likely to affect others, reducing the risk to those who have not been vaccinated.

* * *

The concept of population or herd immunity means that, if there is a high level of immunity because a large enough number of a given population have been immunised, the remaining unimmunised members of the population will receive some protection from infection.

The level of uptake required for herd immunity varies for different diseases, and depends on how contagious the disease is and on the conditions that allow it to spread.

Ad Feedback

It is possible to calculate the proportion of people who should be vaccinated to prevent the disease from spreading.

For example, the World Health Organisation calculates that the herd immunity for measles is 92 per cent to 95 per cent; rubella 83 to 90 per cent; and polio 80 to 86 per cent.

In this way, people who cannot be immunised because they are immuno- compromised, for example because of cancer treatment, organ transplant or because of a weak immune system, also receive some benefit.

Where there are high levels of population immunity from high coverage, diseases such as measles can be eliminated, so long as vaccination coverage is maintained. In 1980, because of vaccination, smallpox was declared eradicated. In a similar way the World Heath Organisation is aiming to eradicate poliomyelitis - a condition that affected many New Zealand children in the past 60 years.

The OECD has noted that "simply because a service is offered, be it targeted or universal, does not mean that eligible families whose children would obtain benefits from it will take it up. The onus is on the parent to take up a service for their child."

Parents need clear evidence-based information for wise decision-making. Thankfully this is available for common childhood immunisations. New Zealanders have no excuses!

When I was a house surgeon at Wellington Hospital, a public health notice from the 1880s hung in the room of Professor Jeffrey Weston. The notice advised that any New Zealand parent who failed to immunise their child against smallpox would be fined [PndStlg]5 - a significant sum. Coercion or mandatory immunisation is not an option in modern-day society.

Nikki Turner of the Immunisation Advisory Centre and many others have worked tirelessly for years to improve New Zealand statistics, but they need support.

Strategies that improve immunisation coverage include better systems and assistance to health professionals, patient reminders and recalls, requiring children to present vaccination certificates before attending school, financial incentives, enhanced access to vaccination services, and community education measures to restore confidence in the science.

Improving the record in New Zealand will become harder the closer we get to the target. But, given the benefits, childhood immunisation completion rates (though improving) are appalling, and an unwavering effort is needed to achieve the established target of 95 per cent completion.

Closing date for submissions to the health committee's inquiry is February 12.

3 comments
Post a comment
Meryl Doinkerly   #3   02:07 pm Jun 04 2011

Fantastic article.

Pay no notice to the rantings of poor Erwin, or his minions.

His ilk will ensure mandatory vaccination in a bizarre self fulfilling prophecy.

More power to medical science.

Dana Stewart   #2   11:02 pm Jan 30 2010

Terrible article, I guess most don't want to know the truth about vaccines and it is hideous that our rates are so high, when did the media become vaccine pushers! Amazing how gullible people are and follow others like sheep.

Erwin Alber   #1   06:58 pm Jan 30 2010

Chairman of the parliament's health select committee inquiry into raising vaccination rates MP Paul Hutchison is of course entitled to his opinion that "New Zealand's failure to achieve anywhere near a 95 per cent completion rate for children's immunisation is a national disgrace that must be remedied."

I for one do however not agree with his sentiment, but on the contrary, consider the vaccination rate far too high. I for one would feel far happier with a zero vaccination rate, which would make for far healthier New Zealand children than the sickly lot we have now, due to their organisms have been poisoned with these neurotoxic and allergenic injections. Unlike unvaccinated children, vaccinated children commonly suffer from asthma, allergies, ear infections, eczema and neurological disorders such as ADHD, hyperactivity or autism.

I suspect that the reason why "For years, New Zealand's completion rates have been far lower than in many other developed and undeveloped countries (which have completion rates up to 95 per cent)" may well be that for years, New Zealand has has had a strong anti-immunisation movement dedicated to providing parents with realistic information about the dangers and the ineffectiveness of vaccines. That "Pacific countries ...are reported to have far better rates than New Zealand" is hardly surprising. In these countries, people blindly follow what the medical authorities tell them, having little or no access to alternative sources of information.

The claim that "There is clear scientific evidence that the benefits of high levels of immunisation to the individual and to society far outweigh the disadvantages (very rare, but sometimes severe, side-effects)" is not backed by any evidence. For one thing, there is no scientific evidence whatsoever that vaccines prevent diseases, and for another, because reporting of side-effects is voluntary, accurate figures documentating the wide-spread harm vaccines cause are unavailable.

The claim that "Vaccines work by stimulating the immune system to develop antibodies to combat infections without the recipient suffering from the disease itself" is an unproven theory which does not stand up to close scrutiny. Even the medical literature admits that the presence of anti-bodies does not equate to protective efficacy.

As for "The concept of population or herd immunity means that, if there is a high level of immunity because a large enough number of a given population have been immunised, the remaining unimmunised members of the population will receive some protection from infection" is pure pseudo-science, as is the claim that "Where there are high levels of population immunity from high coverage, diseases such as measles can be eliminated, so long as vaccination coverage is maintained." There are plenty of outbreaks of so-called "vaccine-preventable" infectious diseases in fully vaccinated populations documented in the medical literature. The claim that vaccination eradicated smallpox is likewise a myth promoted by the medical-pharmaceutical establshment.

The statement that "Poliomyelitis is a condition that affected many New Zealand children in the past 60 years" is partially true; it fails to mention that for about the past 30 years, the only cases of polio in developed nations were caused by the oral polio vaccine.

"Parents need clear evidence-based information for wise decision-making." Indeed. Parents need to know about the countless vaccine-injured children whose health, immune systems and intelligence has been adversely affected by vaccines.

As far as I am concerned, vaccination is an organised criminal enterprise disguised as disease prevention and I will do everything I can to warn parents about this appalling scam and shameless money-making racket.

Some years ago now, New Zealand was the first country to declare itself nuclear free. I look forward to the day when New Zealand can declare itself vaccine free. I won't hold my breath for this to happen in the near future though, because 200 years of thorough brain-washing have had a profound effect on populations. I myself used to be a brain-washed moron for the best part of my life, even getting my 10-yearly tetanus boosters until I found out that vaccination is a gigantic hoax.

Erwin Alber New Zealand Vaccination Information Network

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you love or hate the Wellington Sevens?

I love it; I have my costume and am ready to go.

I'm not going, but reckon it's great for the city.

I hate it. It's naff.

I don't feel strongly either way.

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Follow us