Changing our flag won't make us more patriotic

BY LINLEY BONIFACE
Last updated 08:13 08/02/2010

Relevant offers

Comment

Mallard case raises questions of behaviour Editorial: Let sex case justice be done Editorial: Abuse intervention to test government Holmes' attack on Waitangi Day unjustified High cost of living mars return to NZ Outcomes matter, not state service tinkering Memo to McCully: be more careful in future Editorial: Speaker needs to get Mojo working Money-fuelled madness no way to live Eating without guilt

OPINION: Here's what's keeping me tossing and turning at night: when I'm standing on the podium at the Vancouver Winter Olympics, waiting to be presented with a gold medal for ice skating, or bobsleigh, or that peculiar sport in which you alternately ski and shoot at things, which flag will they run up the flagpole in my honour?

Happily, when I wake up I realise that - providing a sudden plague doesn't strike down all New Zealanders other than those with at least 50 per cent fewer limbs than me - I am unlikely to be chosen to compete in any event at Vancouver, unless of course MallowPuff-eating unexpectedly becomes an Olympic sport. This makes the current debate over the New Zealand flag largely academic for me, because the rarely spoken truth about our premier national emblem is that sportspeople are among the tiny proportion of New Zealanders who regularly get to see it.

That's presumably why sports icons such as Sir Peter Snell and Barbara Kendall are being roped into the current debate about the flag's future: because they're the poor schmucks who have had to wait on various podiums, tapping their feet with impatience, while minor sporting association flunkeys rifle feverishly through drawerfuls of similar-looking flags muttering, "Four stars, not five; four stars, not five . . ."

Even in Wellington, the seat of government, sightings of the New Zealand flag are now rarer than sightings of tui. Only occasionally will you spot the flag flying from a public building, or from the bonnet of a flash car conveying an MP to a bottle store. Unlike in the United States, where flags are so ubiquitous that I expect to see them fluttering from piles of dog poo in the street, very few New Zealanders have the flag on display.

Actually, I know of only two people who fly flags at their home, and neither of them choose the New Zealand flag. One flies the Chilean flag, because he was once an exchange student in Chile, and the other flies the Jolly Roger, because he has wisely decided it is more socially acceptable to express his fascination with pirates by flying the pirate flag rather than, say, walking around with a parrot on his shoulder, or demanding that he be paid in pieces of eight.

Paradoxically, while I'm lukewarm about regarding the New Zealand flag as an expression of our identity, I'm red hot about our reluctance to fly the New Zealand flag as an expression of our identity.

National characteristics are difficult to pin down, but the ones I most value in Kiwis are kindness, tolerance of diversity, and a general reluctance to embrace the sort of bumptious nationalism so often associated with the cult of the flag.

Ad Feedback

Mark Seymour, a Melbourne musician, recently wrote in The Age about his discomfort with Australia's flag obsession. Seymour said he disliked feeling emotionally forced into a corner when he saw kids at the fish and chip shop with the flag wrapped around their shoulders, or drove behind a car bearing a sticker reading, "Australia. Love it or leave it."

The real message underlying the overuse of the flag and other expressions of national identify, said Seymour, was: "Love Australia warts and all, or piss off."

The uneasiness I feel about our flag debate is over the suggestion that we'd somehow be more patriotic if we had a decent flag to rally behind.

In calling for the flag to be replaced, the New Zealand Herald even suggested we were suffering from a "crisis of identify". Do we really have a crisis of identify? Or do we just have a rubbish flag?

I'd suggest the latter. On everything except sentimental grounds, the New Zealand flag is well past its best-by date: dull, impossible to recognise in a crowd, and symbolic of a historic connection that few of us now identify with.

The tino rangatiratanga would be a great replacement because it's beautiful, and because it doesn't resemble anyone else's flag, and because it seems only fair to have a Maori flag for a while, given how long Maori have had to put up with the Union Jack.

However, as the tino rangatiratanga isn't universally accepted among Maori, maybe we should choose a less controversial symbol - a silver fern, or a koru, or, for all I care, a pineapple lump. But let's not allow a change of flag to change the kind of people we are.

- © Fairfax NZ News

16 comments
Post a comment
Patricia Roberts   #16   11:14 am Feb 10 2010

Waitangi Day is getting better every year and if you can't see that, then you need to open your eyes and not just hang on to past images of protest. We are making incredible progress towards equality and harmony, and the Maori flag flying with our national flag was a huge step along the way.

The one very sour note came from the republicans, who used the day to burn our national flag. Clearly they thought this would make us want the black flag they showed and to join their republican cause. For me, it just confirmed that I'm right in sticking up for a totally different viewpoint (www.coolnz.net).

Donald McDonaldson   #15   07:11 am Feb 10 2010

Pete #13. I see nothing bias or bigotted about posting #10. He speaketh the truth. It IS a maori protest day. The government DO make every attempt to treat maori differently to everyone else. There were maori people at my place of work complaining about the lack of day off. No asian or white kiwis were.

jem   #14   10:20 pm Feb 09 2010

Pete #13 Im sorry you feel my comments are bigoted, but then people who speak the honest truth are often mislabeled and insulted.

Im only expressing the sentiment of a very large and growing percentage of this country who are tired of the deliberate segregation being created by our government.

A flag that's sole purpose of creation was separatism, is now flown on national buildings and on our "national" day. How exactly does that help unite us? Please enlighten me.

peter   #13   06:41 pm Feb 09 2010

JEM #10 What a sad posting. While it enlightens us all to your bias and bigotry, we can but feel sorry for people who express such ignorance.

wiremu   #12   06:23 pm Feb 09 2010

If ever there was a reason for changing our flag then "Mark Heath's #7"comments above to "you readers" cements it for me. A new flag, preferably the tino rangatiratanga, would make sure we never had to listen to any more Brits' lecturing us on the tedious intricacies of UK emblems, coats of arms, or other suburban fascinations and pub quiz trivia. The very fact that he found the need proves that no one here really cares anymore about the union thingy or Queens' doodaa. Until then we can all breathe a sigh of relief and get a good nights sleep knowing that when his relatives come over for their hols' they approve of the dying days of empire.

Sarah Moon   #11   01:44 pm Feb 09 2010

William #3 You need to take a deep breath and try and relax. Read the article again, if you need help with any of the big words ask an adult.

JEM   #10   12:19 pm Feb 09 2010

Our flag is not why we are one of the most an Unpatriotic countries in the world.... its the Governments decision to divide us by clearly defining laws that separate maori from the rest.

Waitangi Day will always be Maori Protest day and never be NZ National Day. So lets just drop Waitangi day completely and make a new REAL NZ National day that we can all be positively involved in and show our pride of this Great Nation.

Pete   #9   08:10 am Feb 09 2010

Some of my Maori ancestors died at war, fighting for our current flag. Now the descendants of these men are saying that the flag they died for isn't good enough. Other than costing us money, a change of flag will do absolutely nothing for the land of the wrong white crowd.

Keith   #8   07:57 am Feb 09 2010

I notice that, apart from an item on One News, the media and our politicians have been very quiet about members of the Republican Party openly burning the New Zealand flag on Waitangi Day. Would they have been so quiet if someone had burnt the Tino Rangitiratanga flag? I doubt it. It kind of confirms my belief that it is the media that is mainly pushing the flag change/republicanism debate - not the common people of New Zealand who, in every reliable opinion poll conducted to date, have said that they don't want the flag changed. Maybe the media should take the hint.

Mark Heath   #7   11:43 pm Feb 08 2010

I think a Maori emblem alongside the Union Flag would reflect the partnership. My family from the UK visit NZ every year as guests and are pleased to see the Union flag as part of the NZ flag but it needs a Maori emblem too. By the way, you readers are incorrectly referring to the Union Flag as the Union Jack. The Union Jack is a Union Flag flown from the jack staff of a Royal Navy ship. The 'Union Flag' is the correct name for the emblem on the current NZ flag.


Show 1-6 of 16 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Are you worried about a big earthquake in Wellington?

Yes, I feel unsafe

A bit, but I think we'll be ok

No, it's all hype

I don't care

Vote Result

Related story: Quake fear: No way in or out

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content