Right on cue, Radio NZ presents Oliver Twist

BY RICHARD LONG
Last updated 08:08 09/03/2010

Relevant offers

Comment

Mallard case raises questions of behaviour Editorial: Let sex case justice be done Editorial: Abuse intervention to test government Holmes' attack on Waitangi Day unjustified High cost of living mars return to NZ Outcomes matter, not state service tinkering Memo to McCully: be more careful in future Editorial: Speaker needs to get Mojo working Money-fuelled madness no way to live Eating without guilt

OPINION: Cultural vandalism. Tawdry commercialism. The anguished cries from the Radio New Zealand supporters' corner brings back memories of the Muldoon government's cost-cutting and the crafty fight-back from government departments.

Tasked with making specific cuts to allocated budgets, police at the time offered to sacrifice the Lady Elizabeth police launch, an icon of Wellington Harbour and saviour of boaties, surfers and swimmers in distress.

The government then, by no means as fixated on political polling as today's, could still read the signals well enough. A public relations disaster loomed. The police launch stayed. Foreign Affairs, figuring to work the same campaign, offered to chop their post in New Delhi, never imagining that the government or the public would accept abandoning representation in the world's largest democracy. They got that one wrong.

Prime minister Robert Muldoon, smarting from run-ins with Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi over sporting ties with South Africa, seized the opportunity with relish.

Our just-appointed ambassador to India had to set up shop instead in a shoebox office at Foreign Affairs headquarters in Wellington, where he was constantly teased by visitors lamenting the absence of servers, bearers and punkah wallahs.

Finance Minister Bill English, faced with a sea of budget deficits extending over the horizon, did not fall into the same trap as his predecessor by demanding one-off cuts to departmental spending, but is requiring departments, by and large, to live within their present allocations.

That still did not stop dear old Radio New Zealand, alone among the agencies of state, from doing its own Oliver Twist. On cue, supporters staged street marches and an internet campaign. It does not matter about the world economy, the Kiwi economy, or the budget crisis, RNZ wants more. It is a seductive argument. In the overall scheme of things, RNZ's $34 million allocation is pretty small cheese and they want just a few million more - just the price of a handful of heart operations and dialysis treatments.

They have seen off previous governments who had the temerity to question their budgets: a National administration which suggested an element of commercial sponsorship (tawdry commercialism) and former Labour prime minister David Lange who mused aloud about the incongruity of the state sponsoring Concert Radio, for a tiny audience, when more people would rather listen to Split Enz (cultural vandalism).

It will be interesting to see whether John Key and his merry men will hold fast in the face of this equivalent of the Lady Elizabeth blowtorch test.

Ad Feedback

One problem for governments is that RNZ is a product of the Wellington chattering classes. It has a big audience in the capital, but its penetration in Auckland, with its proliferation of commercial stations, is relatively small.

As a backgrounder in this paper's Saturday's edition pointed out, surveys indicate an overall audience of only 17 per cent of adults, but a much larger group of 84 per cent who believe in the principle of a public broadcaster.

As a country, we would be much the poorer without RNZ's showcase Morning Report and Checkpoint news programmes. And RNZ eloquently demonstrated its role in its special Sunday morning coverage of the  earthquake tsunami threat, hauling presenter Sean Plunket out of bed for coverage which was riveting and  comprehensive.

But RNZ administrators have to accept that they cannot continue to expand while competitors in the real world are adjusting their budgets to new realities. Newspapers are icons of a community too, and in some countries are now receiving state support, but this has never been sought in New Zealand, nor, I suspect, would it be  welcomed.

At a time when RNZ has been expanding, competitors in the electronic media and newspaper editors and  managers have been going through a decade of costcutting and staff trimming - all the while paying the  taxes which help fund state radio. Many of these editors would be astonished at RNZ's staff numbers.

And if it is appropriate for our national ballet and opera companies to have commercial sponsors, why on earth should Concert Radio be exempt? I can't help musing, either, about the prospects of a Kentucky Fried Chicken Kim Hill show. It would be worth a try, just to listen to the splenetic outburst it would draw from the feisty presenter.

- © Fairfax NZ News

5 comments
Post a comment
Tony Green   #5   11:03 am Mar 10 2010

the commercial Dom Post is entitled to its opinion, even to its attacks on independent journalism & hence on democratic freedom of the press -

& its evident wish to suppress broadcasting of musics of many kinds that cannot be supported by commercial radio

& which are valuable cultural heritage that like libraries & art galleries should be made available to all - even if the Dom Post & its mouthpiece in 'stuff.co' & possibly even our well-educated intelligent cultivated thoughtful Ministers of the Crown have got cloth ears or should that be asses' ears.

PB   #4   10:15 am Mar 10 2010

Calling "Radio New Zealand" a mere "public broadcaster" is a misnomer. It also is the last remaining bastion of a free press in our country, which is supposed to be a pillar of democracy. That is free, yes, in terms of commercial or political restraints - so their funding should be guaranteed regardless of circumstances. Everything else is the commercial or corporate press which are NOT in ANY WAY "free". And as comment #2, no surprise Richard Long would come out attacking at the vulnerable fringe: concert radio. A public broadcaster IS supposed to support those communities not adequately represented in the communities. If he has a problem with not enough yodelling getting airtime, he should lobby for more money, not less. We know how terrible TV One has got since these very same standards were implemented. It doesn't need a fear of cultural vandalism, just a memory and an ounce of intelligence to send this idea back to the disproven basket.

Chrissie Small   #3   11:53 pm Mar 09 2010

Oh yes Richard lets just take a world class Radio Station that is National Radio with its outstanding reputation here as well as internationally and turn it into another un-icon of mediocrity. I find your argument lacks merit and shows complete ignorance towards NZ culture and what it means to the many of us who have grown up and old to National Radio and it's excellent content. Content that does not include tacky crappy advertising to downtone its integrity as you and your NACT friends are proposing. You need to get more in touch with what being a KIWI means to many of us and understanding that we prefer hearing our native bird calls on National Radio and not someone pushing consumer items! I cringe and even my children cringe at the thought! They are the up coming generation and even they appreciate National Radio so much more so for it's non advertising and it's uninterupted New Zealand flavoured content! So my advice to this National Government and people like yourself...get in touch and get real!

Alan Woods   #2   11:42 am Mar 09 2010

As a Former Chief of Staff to National Party Leaders Bill English and Don Brash it was no surprise which side of the fence you would stand. However let's just call you on the some of the "facts" of your argument. RNZ National(2009 Metropolitan Station of the Year...yes that includes Auckland)has 17 percent of the Adult Radio Listening Audience. This ranks RNZ National as the number one station nationally. It is currently second (barely) behind NewstalkZB in Auckland, but in previous recent years it was number one there too. It is easy to make subjective unsupported statements like "RNZ is a product of the Wellington chattering classes..." if you are untruthful about the statistics.

zocor   #1   09:39 am Mar 09 2010

What the NZ electorate needs to know, is how many Public Servants we have, and on what average salary earned. If that was 30,000 people at a $70,000 pa. less tax leaves lets say $50,000 each. A rough calculation based on pleb-pay of $15.00 per hour, would require the tax of seven wage earners to support one public servant. This represents the tax take of 210,000 wage earners is required to staff our civil service. So RNZ can stamp the pavements in protest if they wish, but at the end of the day, it's the electorate that picks up the tab.

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Are you worried about a big earthquake in Wellington?

Yes, I feel unsafe

A bit, but I think we'll be ok

No, it's all hype

I don't care

Vote Result

Related story: Quake fear: No way in or out

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content