It's time for a Lange 'cuppa' before we bring in national standards
Relevant offers
Comment
OPINION: Failure to develop sound policy may lead to chaos, writes Bill Courtney.
I presented the Hands Up For Learning petition on the Government's national standards policy to Parliament last week. Tens of thousands of concerned parents, board of trustee members, principals and teachers have asked the House to support the call for the implementation of this controversial policy to be slowed down.
In political speak, it's time for a David Lange "cup of tea".
Harvey McQueen, a former education aide to Mr Lange, wrote last year, in a review of the 20th anniversary of Tomorrow's Schools, that: "Each education minister has to relearn a lesson which their predecessors have already learnt the hard way. You can make education policy in offices in the capital, but you cannot implement it without the co-operation of the teachers."
This truism is even more relevant now in the devolved schools system that Tomorrow's Schools created. Governments may introduce policies and schools must carry out the implementation.
But in our strongly democratic, decentralised system, if schools are not consulted and involved in policy development and design, the outcome is often chaos. In education, there are no silver bullets.
The fundamental problem with national standards has been the failure to develop sound policy at the outset. Colin James wrote an insightful piece on both national standards and the Emissions Trading Scheme late last year and concluded with the observation: Fast Law is Bad Law.
Ironically, at Parliament last week, the presentation of the national standards petition was followed immediately by a march and petition presentation on the ETS.
The essence of "governance" is to make policy but national standards falls short of the Government's own guidelines on how to develop good policy.
From the outset, there has been a failure to identify "what is the cause of the problem?" or to evaluate multiple options and to seek the optimum solution. We have not been told "how might this option make a difference?" or "what does success look like?"
With national standards, there is a clear need to understand the difference between standards with a "small s" and standards with a "big S". Most people would think that improving education standards implies raising the overall quality of education in our schools, so as to improve pupils' knowledge - that is, they can achieve more.
However, Standards-based reform in the education system involves developing a system of explicit statements of learning objectives at various levels. The curriculum development team at the Education Ministry like to call them signposts and they argue that the Standards fit in quite nicely with the brand new New Zealand curriculum. But if the Standards are such a natural fit, where were they in the original development?
An open letter from education academics to the education minister last November made it clear how many in the New Zealand education sector felt: "The flaws in the new system are so serious that full implementation of the intended National Standards system over the next three years is unlikely to be successful. It will not achieve intended goals and is likely to lead to dangerous side-effects."
The minister simply brushed aside the academics' letter saying it contained "nothing new", begging the question whether that included the reference to serious flaws.
Education Minister Anne Tolley believes that only minor tweaks need be made to the Standards in a "bedding down" period, but this is inconsistent with both the academics' views and the experiences of the professionals on the job.
The call from the Auckland Primary Principals' Association last week to boycott further training clearly highlights growing frustrations with the Standards and the inadequate training supporting their implementation.
Teachers must provide the judgments of pupils' progress and achievement against the Standards and parents want to know how their children are doing at school, so they can support their learning.
But if the Standards are not clear enough for teachers to be confident about them, then we, as parents, will lack the confidence to use the information contained in the reports.
* * *
The populist appeal of the National Standards policy is that it may be timely to raise standards in the state and state-integrated school system and this argument has been pursued vigorously by many parts of the media. Yet internationally, there is inconclusive evidence that National Standards actually raise standards. Modern education policy is often developed and prosecuted with the media in mind.
A recent British study by the CfBT Education Trust into how education policy is made, shows evidence of a widening gap between evidence and policy making.
The study also found that the views of the prime minister are dominating and that there are costs to a system in which decisions become more political and are taken higher up.
The Government needs to understand that the dissatisfaction with this controversial policy is growing and its support at ground level is waning. But will our voices be heard?
Bill Courtney is a parent of two school- aged children and is a former school trustee.
Sponsored links
I have to agree with Ian on this one. I was at school during the Tomorrow's Schools era and it was a disaster, I have a cousin who is at school now and it's even more of a disaster. A generation of teachers/education-system has failed New Zealand citizens by allowing left wing politics to influence a system that was working fine by world standards before all the changes. A shake up of the system is overdue, the teachers union can pick out small problems with the new system, just like any new system there will be a few bits and pieces that need fixing. But the current system has many problems and many voters agree. At the last general election a lot of the votes for National were a vote against left wing thinking that has become so dominant in our society, not just from traditional National supporters like farmers and business owners but from a lot of middle class and working class New Zealanders. I think it’s shameful that an unelected union can oppose the elected Government just to make a political point while the children are caught in the middle yet again.
Of course decent teachers would be worried about national standards, they are the ones smart enough to know that it's a waste of money, won't improve anything, and is so fatally flawed that it will never give us accurate information. That's the big point here, the information the testing generates won't be any good because it's so badly designed. The whole thing is ridiculous, it has been implemented overseas and never, ever succeeded in improving actual education standards. The Government is treating us like a bunch of dummies, introducing a completely useless system and telling us that people don't like it because they don't want accountability. What a joke. Look at the overseas evidence. How would you feel, say, if you had a heart condition and the doctor said to you 'okay, I have this new medicine I'm going to put you on, it has been trialled overseas and never been found to work, but I don't care about the research'. You'd think he was a complete idiot and tell him to get stuffed. So why is the Government doing this to our most precious resource, our kids?
It's interesting to see how suckered in people have been. The idea that teachers are afraid of accountability is a smokescreen and, somewhat cleverly, helps promote the lie that this testing will result in a reliable national 'standard' against which students and teachers can be valdily and reliably assessed. It will not produce anything of the sort, as a professional with 20 years experience in psychometrics (no, I'm not a teacher, I work in science) I categorically state that this system is incabable of producing reliable and consistent measurement. It is flawed, it is awful, and it's a sham, even more so with hollow, uninformed arguments about 'fear of accountability'. The thing will be a disaster and the children of New Zealand will suffer.
Ian and Bertie's comments are classic examples of why this policy needs slowing down. They show scant understanding of the issues and the sort of prejudice about teachers that has come mark Joe Public's view of teacher opposition. Thank God for people like Bill who dare to think a little more deeply then the drivel dished up by those that still claim teacher opposition is because they don't want to be accountable.
Tomorrows schools are here today...and its a bag of worms. I want a national standard that all students and schools can be measured against, with no "fudging" of the tests or results to make schools and teachers look good. I also want a focus put back onto the basics..reading, writing and maths as core subjects and the tossing out of all the other touchey feeley crap that distracts from education The kind of stuff that parents should be responsible for.Schools are for core subject education not a tool of social enineering.
Lange was the instigator of this problem with "Tomorrow's Schools". Either these left-leaning principals and their union followers do what the public require (and voted for), or get out of the profession. Decent teachers are not worried about the national standards, only the useless, union-inspired losers that don't believe in scrutiny.
Everywhere else has "accountability"....except Teachers. No wonder our kids are failing. Geez Bill its people like YOU who are holding this country (and our kids) back.
I disagree. We need better teachers, ones who can think for themselves, not ones who need to be told 'explicitly' how to measure performance. Its time we had teachers who can 'think' and participate in improving education for our kids. Not teachers who need to be spoon-fed on what it is they need to deliver.
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
Bus changes raise fears in suburbs
Police access Facebook in Wellington murder investigation
Concerns for missing Featherston woman
Top skateboarders shred in Wellington
Scorching Bay death now a matter for coroner
Police search for missing Featherston woman
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
A burning issue: When coffins get too big
Promoter dismisses bike helmet harm study
Tension high as lethal log pile cleared
Victim was holding bat, says witness
Engineer's report prompts mall evacuation
One dead after Hawke's Bay crash
Man missing after Harbour Bridge fall
Danny Lee drops back at Pebble Beach
Obama tries to defuse birth control fight
Police recapture Madonna stalker
Promoter dismisses bike helmet harm study
Will bill make food safer or be a form of control?
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
EU courts Kiwis for science grants
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
Police access Facebook in Wellington murder investigation
Helmet law halves cyclist numbers
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
Lloyd Morrison: Leader of the pack
Both islands rattled by quakes overnight
Helmet law halves cyclist numbers
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
Promoter dismisses bike helmet harm study
Hurricanes game set to be a rural rugby spectacle
Search for oil, gas may near Wellington
All Wellington bus routes to change
Sorry Britain, to have offended you with our drinking
Newest First
Oldest First
Should bicycle helmets be mandatory?
Not being a Kiwi, I am not qualified to comment on past or present NZ schooling. But I did experience National Standards "tick-box' teaching in the UK and I have to tell you that it's an educational disaster.
Few politicians (nor, it has to be said, most of the general public) have not even the remotest idea about what makes a good school or a good teacher. They don't go in to observe real teaching or see how real children behave when in a group with thirty others. Oh no, that would spoil their prejudices (hence some of the moronic statements in other letters) Teaching is a very personal and imprecise role simply because teachers are dealing with the physical and emotional complexity of developing children: and children cannot be processed and turned out like widgets.
Anne Tolley is the worst case scenario for education in this country: a here today, gone tomorrow career politician of limited intellect who is hell-bent on climbing the greasy pole - mindless of anything but the need to force through a silly policy. To Anne Tolley all children are numbers that can have other numbers attached to them. Anne likes simple numbers, she can understand simple concepts so makes simple things important. She must hate children.
Anne Tolley knows that she has no substance and so, rather than engage in discussion with academics and professional educators she dismisses them out of hand in what is really a most ignorant manner.
Good luck Kiwis, you're going to need it.