Extreme is the new normal
JIM SALINGER
THE FURNACE: Extreme weather has been linked to disasters such a fires in Australia.
Relevant offers
Comment
OPINION: As I watch from my summer subtropical perch in Brisbane, Queensland, the somewhat unprecedented rains that deluged parts of Australia during the summer of 2010/11 have been replaced by sizzling heat waves this summer. These raise some pertinent lessons on climate and risk management for New Zealand.
Firstly, let's look at some figures and ask the question of what are the climate mechanisms behind the heat waves.
Figures from Australia's Bureau of Meteorology figures show that the highest temperatures of 2011 occurred in the third Australian heat wave of the year. This affected the Pilbara region in the north west of Western Australia. Multiple sites broke the previous Western Australian December record of 48.8 degrees Celsius.
This month incessant heat has struck the interior with daytime highs soaring to the mid forties. As I pen this there are a few more days of this heat wave left with temperatures averaging between 35C and 40C in central Australia. Places have been recording daily lows of 30C and daily highs of close to 45C. Mean temperatures have been running over 6C above average.
Meteorologists measure the warmth of the air lying above one spot as the 500-1000 hPa thickness. The "thickness" is a measure of how warm or cold a layer of the atmosphere is. High values mean warm air, and low values mean cold air. Summer 500-1000 hPa thickness values lie between 5600 and 5700 metres over Australia. It was values of around 5760 metres that brought New Zealand's highest temperatures, in the low forties, in February 1973.
And what has been happening in late December and early January? An incredibly hot blob of air has sat over parts of inland Australia with thickness values of 5850 metres or more.
It is a simple law of physics that with more greenhouse gases in a layer of atmosphere the warmer surface temperatures get. Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 now are at 392 parts per million compared with 280ppm in 1750. This means that the lower atmosphere is thicker and retains more warmth, as more CO2 in the atmosphere traps extra heat. The consequence is that global warming leads to an increase in the magnitude and incidence of heat waves.
The first lesson from the sizzling continental heat wave is that global warming has arrived for some time now, and the climate has warmed. Global warming is no longer a theory based on abstract calculations of what the climate is very likely to do in future decades. In 2007 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded: "It is very likely that hot extremes, heat waves and heavy precipitation events will continue to become more frequent."
The second lesson - the canary in the coal mine - is that because of global warming, the frequency of these extreme weather events will increase. Thus the century old high temperature extremes will be exceeded more often in the future.
The third lesson is that there needs to be better preparation for these events by civil society. Heat waves can have debilitating effects on the elderly who are not so healthy. The 2003 European heat wave caused at least 40,000 deaths and the 2010 western Russian heat wave 55,000 deaths. Heat waves also increase the fire risk when there is little rain, as occurred in the Black Saturday heat wave and bushfires in February 2009 in Victoria.
At least New Zealand is the lucky country in this respect, surrounded by oceans which dampen down any high temperatures. However Niwa future climate scenarios show a large increase in days above 30C and 35C in eastern districts with more frequent very hot nor'westers as the 21st century progresses.
Global warming is here, now - and not a phenomenon for future generations to deal with. We must embark on a course of emissions reductions targets as soon as possible. If we do not act now the severity of such heat waves and the subsequent damage to life and property will increase. There is no time like the present to invest in our future wellbeing.
Former Niwa scientist Jim Salinger is resident for the summer as a research fellow at the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility at Griffiths University, Queensland.
Related story: Global warming is a modern-day myth
Sponsored links
RW #73, I see the leader of your local groupthink circle (Gareth Renowden at Hot Topic) has just used GISTEMP to crow about a 0.51 C Nov 2011 anomaly.
Good thing he didn't end his series with the Dec 2011 anomaly (0, first time since 1993) otherwise he'd have to explain an exactly average anomaly.
Tricky, and a bit boring for the circle I would imagine.
So there's a bit of holiday reading for you there Salinger and for you of the msm who perpetuate this AGW garbage.
Nonentity, Treadgold, Seth (all posts): lies and nonsense, which in Treadgold's case will be exposed if the NIWA matter does finally get to court. You "sceptics" are getting ever more shrill and desperate - you've painted yourselves into an uncomfortably tight corner. Of course in this "non-warming recently" world of yours, the warmest La Nina year yet (2011) is just something to be conveniently ignored.
Yes happyending, not only is CO2 not a pollutant and a naturally occuring trace component of our atmosphere it actually is a coolant. I think it was used as a refrigerant in the 1920s and 30s. http://jennifermarohasy.com/author/nasif-s-nahle/
HappyfeetHappyfeet #69: I think you have missed the point of this particular debate. The argument is not about pollution. Nobody I know on either side of the climate debate sanctions pollution or for that matter objects to reasonable measures to prevent or clean it up. Please note that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. It is a naturally occurring component of our atmosphere.
Anon #32, RW #57, re NZCSET v NIWA (NZ Temperature record). An update from an NZCSET representative:-
"The Coalition needs to file all its affidavits by 20 January, and NIWA will have until late February to respond. We should then belatedly discover what the real defence is (if any). The case will then be set down for trial".
The NSCSET claim is based largely on the fact that NIWA did NOT follow the established methodology of Rhoades and Salinger 1993. Now call me a cynic if you like but I'm sure I detect an element of irony in the situation given Salinger's Climategate associations (do you RW?).
It's a fact that humans have a huge impact on the environment. And it's a fact that we spew out pollution. Now after the first hundred years of industrialization there hasn't been a huge impact yet on our planet. And this is as far into the future the sceptic can see. Because they are selfish and can't think beyond their own existence. Now the enlightened doesn't think about himself, he thinks about the future of this planet and of future generations. The fact is that in another hindered years of the current rate of growth and pollution and population the earth will be Ina terrible state. This whole movement is about a slow change in the way we live on this planet so that hopefully it will be as wonderful place to live in the future as it is today.
None of the commonly cited temperature records available to the IPCC and the public shows warming over the last eight years. The scientific evidence is simply not there. Sea levels are not rising any faster than expected. Yes, we are still coming out of an ice age, so long term warming is normal. There's no indication that man-made greenhouse gas emisions is speeding up the heating. None. It's a theory and one that is steadily being dis-proved by looking at sea level rise, sea, land and troposphere temperature records and satelite data. The data is available without visiting the doomsayers or the sceptics websites. Just follow the science.
#57 oh no, if I'm wrong (and for me it is IF with quite a loud snigger) I'll happily admit it. Except, I won't be able to, will I? Cos if the sceptics/denialists/whatever you want to label us are wrong, all life will be wiped out, won't it. THAT'S why NZ has to bankrupt itself paying billions in carbon taxes to the UN.
Global warming, if it happens (again that IF), won't affect me overly. To be bluntly honest, I don't care. I think it's a crock and don't give a damn if I'm wrong. But the crux of the argument, to me, is how will the developed world sending itself broke, living like paupers, and giving the UN complete power and dominion over the whole globe, fix it?
Human safety priority over heritage
Council seeks massive cost cuts
Carterton balloon was not airworthy
Morgue water arts show axed after iwi opposition
Bret's McKenzie's biggest fans
Car crashes into parking meter
Transmission Gully could make traffic worse
Warning for gales in Wellington
Kapiti tenpin bowler scores perfect game
Carterton tragedy: Safety chief would refuse balloon ride
Major courts overhaul proposed
Foreign Affairs Ministry confirms 305 jobs to go
Mob cancels star's performance
Kiwis not up with online security
Helena Bonham Carter 'honoured'
New hope for kiwifruit growers
Gender non-conformity linked to abuse
Nelsen cleared to lead NZ against Jamaica
Robinson starts for Chiefs against old team
Man's childhood comic collection fetches $4.2m
What do you think of the planned price increase for rubbish bags?
Newest First
Oldest First
RW #26, just heard these words on TV3 news -
"NIWA has admitted that it got the summer forecast wrong"