Editorial: Taser power comes with responsibility

OPINION: Dramatically speaking, the police account of a lunchtime confrontation with a violent, P-addled motorist in Waitemata last year leaves something to be desired: "I presented the Taser at the offender and laser-painted him, explaining that he would have 50,000 volts passed through him if he did not comply," the report on the incident reads.

Either the unidentified author speaks to violent suspects in the manner of a science teacher explaining the theory of relativity, or he has chosen to spare his audience the actual language used. With his matter-of-fact delivery, the author also fails to convey the drama of the situation. Trouble began when a man threatened officers with a wheel brace, continued with a chase in which one police car was side-swiped, another was rammed from behind and a third was reversed into, and concluded only when the offender was shot with a 50,000-volt stun gun.

But as an illustration of the benefits of equipping police with stun guns, there could be no better example. Not only has the risk to police and public been minimised, so has risk to the offender – he has been subdued without lasting harm.

The reputation of police has copped a beating in recent years – deservedly so in the case of the covering up of police sexual misconduct – but police handling of the introduction of electronic stun guns has been exemplary.

Incident reports issued to The Dominion Post show that in each of the nine instances in which police fired Tasers last year, officers acted with commendable restraint. In several instances, the offenders may owe their lives to the Tasers.

After one incident in which a person wielding a sword was subdued, an officer observed: "I was present throughout the incident, I believe that had the Taser not being [sic] available then there is the real possibility that [name blanked out] would have been shot by the police."

Civil libertarians such as Marie Dyhrberg and Michael Bott, who protested long and loud against the introduction of Tasers, should reconsider their positions. Use of stun guns is not risk-free: they have been misused overseas and linked to several deaths. But the risks associated with being shot with a stun gun are infinitesimally less than the risks associated with being shot with a firearm.

Last year just 32 Tasers were available to police in four districts – Auckland, Waitemata, Counties-Manukau and Wellington. This year the total number on issue will expand to 681 and they will be available throughout the country. If the present use rate continues, police calculate there will be 213 Taserings a year. The challenge for police is to maintain the same high standard of accountability.

The public wants police to be able to defend themselves against increasingly violent and desperate criminals, but trust will evaporate if Tasers are used in New Zealand as they have been overseas to deal with people making nuisances of themselves or for the purposes of unlawful punishment or retribution.

Police have a valuable new tool. They must continue to use it responsibly.

- © Fairfax NZ News

Newest First

Oldest First

phil   #4   05:05 pm Feb 19 2010

People with pace makers do not usually commit violent crimes necessitating the use of extreme force.

phil   #3   12:16 pm Feb 09 2010

Tasers can be fatal if used on someone with a pacemaker.

Excited-Delirium blog   #2   10:55 am Feb 09 2010

The most important consideration with tasers is to explicitly reject the false claims of safety made by the slick talking stungun salesmen. Taser International makes claims of safety that are now widely considered to be false. The Attorney General in the US State of Maryland recently studied the issue and concluded that Taser International has "significantly understated" the risks of taser use. You can also Google the Canadian Braidwood Inquiry. And the US AMA concluded that tasers can cause death, "directly or indirectly".

Another issue when claiming lives saved is to compare the number of subjects shot to death by police before the introduction of tasers into the country. And then compare it to afterward. Most claims of lives saved by tasers fall to pieces with such a simple examination of the basic statistics.

zap excessive   #1   10:11 am Feb 09 2010

one of the most disturbing aspects of taser use is the voltage level. we only use 10,000 volts to bring down cattle but 50,000 to bring down a human being

Ad Feedback