Culling Wellington's pigeons, does Jesus have a sense of humour, and public transport
At euthanasia's coal face
Justine Armstrong expresses horror at seeing pigeons dying in Wellington's Ghuznee St.
The agent used to euthanase the birds is alpha chloralose, a stupefying narcotic that suppresses the birds' respiratory and cardiac system in the same way that tens of thousands of domestic pets are euthanased annually in this country. I challenge her supposition that the birds are "obviously in pain".
She correctly observes that the birds are disoriented and confused.
The real point to be made is that the coal face of urban animal management is repugnant.
In the case of pigeons, I think we have danced around the sensitivities of naive people with selective morality, narrow vision and leather handbags long enough. Decisions have been made and the job is being done.
If objectors can't handle theresult of the decision, they should get involved, or stop whining and turn their heads. I take my hat off to the people in animal shelters and veterinary clinics who effect the true horror so the rest of us don't have to see it.
STEPHEN LAYTON
Waikanae
Heard the one about Jesus?
Thank you for Tom Scott's cartoon of the confessional. It was funny, and a reassuring reminder of our humanity.
Heck, were the Church perfect, it would have no room for people like me.
Believe it or not, Catholics are good at laughing at themselves, and they have a great fund of jokes. Have you heard this one?
A messenger rushed into the Vatican: "Holy Father! I have good news and bad news.
"Jesus has returned to earth as he promised. I've just been talking to him on the phone." The Pope was overjoyed.
"That's marvellous! After that, what can be the bad news?"
The messenger replied, "He was calling from Salt Lake City."
JOY COWLEY
Pipitea
Pope's censure is bewildering
I am bemused that Pope Benedict XVI feels pressured into censuring that good Catholic, Bishop Richard Williamson, who has been condemned by Jewish groups and German Chancellor Angela Merkel for views he might have held on the Holocaust.
I have perused my catechism and can find no doctrine that binds the faithful to accept claims by Jews or any others regarding the nature and/or number of atrocities committed by the Nazis against Jews, Catholics, gypsies, intellectuals, communists, the mentally ill or otherwise imperfect, and countless others who, for whatever reason, fell foul of a murderous regime.
From what I've read and know of Bishop Williamson, he seeks to safeguard and pass on the deposit of faith crucial to our salvation. The only Jew that the Pope need heed absolutely is he who founded the Church and remains its permanent head, our lord and saviour, Jesus Christ.
But then, he also was condemned by the Jews ...
PHILIP LYNCH
Elderslea
Religious and political
Graeme Davidson's venture into the tricky waters of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (Religion and Ethics, Feb 7-8) generated more heat than light.
Wellington Catholic Archbishop John Dew was correct to apologise for the actions of Father Gerry Burns. Any protest against Israel's actions must make quite clear that the state, not people of Jewish faith or ethnicity, is the target. I believe that Father Burns' actions, though clearly motivated by compassion and a concern for justice, didn't make this distinction.
When a senior churchman, wearing his vestments of office, splatters paint and blood over a monument of great emotional symbolism to another faith community, his action automatically takes on a religious, as well as political, dimension. It also automatically implicates all of his faith (including me) in that action.
It's doubly sad that this took place in Wellington, a city that has always enjoyed reasonably harmonious relations between religious groups, a city in which Archbishop Francis Redwood and Rabbi Herman van Staveren would regularly meet for morning coffee in Boulcott St.
The aim of this protest was presumably to end the fighting in Gaza. It would be a tragedy if the only result were to open a second front in Wellington.
JOHN SULLIVAN
Aro Valley
Reasonable conclusions
While my heart obviously goes out to Olga Tuckerman on the loss of her home in the Australian bush- fires, the stoic acceptance of the loss of her home as an inexplicable act of God frustrated me.
She begins by thanking God for sparing her life (though I wonder why he didn't do the same for those people who weren't so lucky), and then shows complete loyalty to him in his decision to raze the precious home she shared with her late husband.
For me, any reasonable person can draw only two conclusions from this awful disaster. The first is that God is a bloodthirsty, ecocidal tyrant, who takes great pleasure in seeing his children suffer. The second is that he doesn't exist.
DEREK HOPPER
Te Aro
Council: it was not us
I write in response to Justine Armstrong who claimed city officials condoned the poisoning of pigeons in and around Ghuznee St.
We don't condone putting animals through a long and drawn-out death and haven't been involved in a pigeon-eradication programme in the city, though we are aware that, from time to time, pigeons are poisoned around the central business district.
Last year, after complaints about pigeons soiling seating and footpaths and entering food premises, we investigated the best way to deal with the problem, including lethal methods.
However, it became evident that, though pigeons are a problem in certain areas, no simple or short-term solution exists.
Our preferred way to deal with the problem is to work with business-owners and food premises to pigeon-proof their buildings and stop pigeons entering shops. We also discourage people from feeding the birds and leaving food scraps lying around.
It's understandable that people thought the council was involved with the recent poisoning. We received a number of complaints and our staff did help dispose of some dead birds. However, the council was not involved in the poisoning.
DEREK FRY
Wellington City Council
Let's go back to the past
Many pensioners, including me, find themselves paying three or four times as much for bus/train travel as they did when the $5 day-pass was available.
Metlink has decided that the afternoon peak time shall be from 3pm-6.30pm. This differs from what actually occurs.
Public transport at 3pm has few passengers, crowding becoming apparent only after 4pm. It doesn't get serious till at least 4.30pm. At 6pm, buses and trains certainly have sitting room.
A more realistic peak period would be 4.30pm-6pm. Additionally, pensioners subject to this draconian rule merely use their cars when they must travel for appointments, contributing to much more serious road congestion, which actually does start about 3pm.
The object of public transport is to reduce the number of cars on the road. Metlink's heavy-handed attitude merely reverses that sensible policy to everyone's detriment.
The answer is simple: bring back the $5 go-anywhere day-pass, letting it run in conjunction with the "free" travel for pensioners. At present, "free" travel is considerably more expensive than the $5 day-pass ever was.
KEN MOSLEY
Silverstream
TO THE POINT
Cartoonist Tom Scott's obsession with bishops in kinky underwear is tedious. If you have any control over him - as you should - please tell him to stop.
DAVID GRACE, Karori
Your editorial, Villainy behind the stumps, was certainly topical, given the profile of the Chappell-Hadlee series. However, Brad Haddin's appeal was for Neil Broom's being bowled, not caught behind, after Haddin's glove had dislodged the bail. No doubt, the extent of Haddin's knowledge will be debated ad infinitum, given the split-second timing of the incident.
PAUL MEARS, Tawa
Victoria's state and Australia's federal governments are responsible for mass murder for not organising a co-ordinated evacuation plan in the most at-risk bushfire areas, despite having full knowledge days in advance of the conditions to come.
STAN MACKOWIAK, Levin
I wonder why highly inflammable trees are permitted in areas of Australia that have a high fire-risk record?
GEOFF MANNING, Heretaunga
I agree entirely with Heather Bray about the need for at least a 20 per cent deposit when applying to a bank for a mortgage. I think earlier correspondent Noel Salisbury's thoughts might be influenced by the fact that he was, for many years, a real estate agent in Tawa. He might still be one.
Dr A LESLIE FLORENCE, Paraparaumu
Jeanette Fitzsimons says that the SIS should investigate no MP, including Keith Locke, because they were all "elected by the people". No Green MP was elected; they're all list MPs. None of them, as with all lists MPs, has an electorate to answer to so maybe someone should be keeping an eye on them.
COLIN MOORE, Ngaio
P Miller says Jordan was created at Israel's expense by splitting Israel in two. Strange. Jordan (initially as Transjordan) was formalised on April 11, 1921. Israel wasn't created until May 14, 1948.
DON CARSON, Wadestown
On Tuesday, I read that the Government was preparing to trim tens of millions of dollars of departmental spending as it embarked on a line-by-line review of their budgets. I thought, "Yes, we all have to make sacrifices." The next day, I read that the Government was to announce a $300 million deal to settle three big Treaty claims. I feel tricked.
REG FOWLES, Shannon
You can add your comment below, or submit a letter for publication. Letters should not exceed 200 words and must include the writer's full name, home address and daytime phone number. Letters will be edited for clarity and length.
Sponsored links
In response to Mr. Fry’s letter ‘it wasn’t us’. The Council is incorrect if they think they are not responsible for the suffering of the pigeons who died by poison slowly and horribly in the Guznee Street area last week. By rejecting all efforts from animal welfare organisations to help them research and conduct a non-lethal effective pigeon control scheme for Wellington, the Wellington City Council is indeed responsible for the unnecessary suffering caused by private control efforts. Key expert organisations - including SAFE, PETA International, the SPCA, the WACC and The global Pigeon Control Advisory Service - have offered their expertise and in the case of PiCAS, free consultation and action planning, which the City Council has declined. Instead of stepping forward and making a decision to be a leader in New Zealand councils and exploring a different way to solve these perceived problems, the Council has done nothing. Instead they sit quietly in the knowledge that individuals will kill the pigeons themselves and they can wash their hands of it with no accountability. I hope that at the very least they can enforce the laws of pest control and laws associated with the poison used in this event and prosecute whoever was responsible.
Mary Heslan Te Aro
Editorial: Wellington's waterfront is a gem
Sean Plunket: A holiday at Lyall Bay
Editorial: Family reunions - who should pay?
Trade talks vital, but benefits vague
Sorry Britain, to have offended you with our drinking
Regifting is not just ok, it's great
Does David Shearer want to be Tony Blair?
Editorial: Veto protects Syria's blood-stained leader
It's the Halbergs: Let the debate begin
Why are our children so badly behaved?
Editorial: Section 9 row adds to asset sale unease
Treasury should not venture into schools
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
Hurricanes thumped by Crusaders at Mangatainoka
Top skateboarders shred in Wellington
Police access Facebook in Wellington murder investigation
Hare Krishnas gather in capital
Unfinished Strathmore townhouses on market
Firm pays $20m for Wellington office block
Bus changes raise fears in suburbs
Valentines brings out 'wildebeests'
Sir Peter Jackson quake-strengthening chapel
Woman, 91, rues not hitting thief with stick
Critics coming round as Phoenix change ethos
Hurricanes thumped by Crusaders at Mangatainoka
Quakes blow Wellington's benchmark
Top skateboarders shred in Wellington
Governor General's concert draws thousands
Scorching Bay death now a matter for coroner
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
Police access Facebook in Wellington murder investigation
Newest First
Oldest First
I wonder if Mr Layton has ever struggled for a breath, when he suggests that a ‘stupefying narcotic that suppresses the bird’s respiratory and cardiac system’ would not cause them pain. Perhaps Ms Armstrong could have said ‘obviously in distress’ although her supposition that the birds were ‘in pain’ cannot be discounted by any one of us. If ingesting a toxic substance that will cause hallucinations, muscle spasms, lowers your body temperature to extreme levels, leaves you struggling for a breath and ultimately brings about your death, does not cause you pain, it would certainly be most distressing. The suggestion that domestic pets are put down in a similar manner is untrue. I have seen hundreds of animals released from life by vets and animal carers, all of them died within a minute, quietly with hardly more than a tremor. The drug used, which is not Alpha chloralose, does not allow the animal time to move around, or to become disorientated, dehydrated or nauseous or feel much pain and it works quickly. Domestic animals in a clinic are also comforted at the time to help disperse any pain that is felt for those few seconds. They are not left outside alone, to vomit and fall of buildings and wander out into the road to be squashed by cars and to be picked up by council workers to suffocate their last breaths in a plastic bag.
This substance (Alpha chloralose) is used by pest control companies for killing a variety of animals, in this case pigeons. Perhaps, if administered correctly in the right doses it is an effective sedative. But in the hands and function of pest controllers it causes extreme distress, fear and ultimately fatal effects for the animals that ingest it. It is not humane and it should be illegal. ‘Pest’ controllers cannot control the amount that a bird ingests or indeed stop other birds or animals from ingesting it, they can ingest too much and die from it, or they can ingest just a little and fly away to die slowly because they are no longer have control over their own faculties. In this particular case the pest controller or private individual did not even adhere to the minimal legal requirements in the usage of this drug. Areas where the drug is placed and the results will be seen must be sign-posted as such, and all birds are to be picked up to be humanely destroyed. Who ever conducted this event has brazenly disregarded these very minimal requirements and should be prosecuted.
I certainly agree with Mr Layton that the ‘coalface’ as he puts it, of urban animal management is particularly repugnant. But I do not agree that it needs to be so. Nor do I agree that those of us wish to inject some common sense and compassion into the way animal populations are controlled are particularly naïve. Neither do I think that those who care about these issues have a particularly narrow vision. On the contrary I think the groups I have spoken to about these issues have a fully comprehensive and long term vision. Rather it is those who conduct short-term, short sighted, isolated control events that have the narrow vision. Groups concerned about animal welfare like PETA, SAFE, SPCA and Wellington’s WACC are most willing to engage in talks about ways to solve these problems and are prepared to participate in acting on such talks. I commend Justine for ‘doing something’ and expressing her experience and her vie w in public, too few people are willing to stand up and disagree with the traditional practices in New Zealand society.
Mr Layton suggested that ‘tens of thousands’ of domestic pets are put to sleep annually; he is perhaps half right, the number is more in the ‘hundreds of thousands’. This does not include the mass slaughterhouses which are the base of our food industry, or the genocide that is sponsored by our conservation department, it relates only to our most beloved pets. The animals that love us, serve us, are devoted to us and are dependent on us, these animals we neglect and abuse by the hundreds of thousands. Certainly some of those euthanased are very spoilt pets, being released from the degradations of aging and bad diets. But the majority are unwanted, abandoned and neglected pet species. The hundreds of vet clinics and animal shelters that cover New Zealand cannot cope with the volume of unwanted animals; they have no choice but to put them down. For some of these animals it is the only humane treatment they have received in their entire lives. It should wrench us all that this true. Our culture is suffering from a long tradition of killing without thought and without consequence. It is the way things are done and no one questions it. This accepted darkness sits in our psyche and broods like an unseen virus, no one notices, until the conditions are right and it erupts and someone puts their child in the spin dryer. Our society is in desperate need of a foundation of basic compassion. While Mr Layton dances around us waiting for us to go away so he can get back to the brutal ‘coalface’, we would rather he step back with us and take a look at other ways to excavate the problems we have all created.
In regards to the suggestion that ‘a decision has been made’ about pigeons in the city, this is untrue. The council have said they will not be do anything, and in so doing, condone the actions of any private efforts at lethal control. Those companies and individuals that are conducting such control should understand that they are not only committing crimes of inhumanity but also increasing the problems for both people and pigeons. For this they should be condemned by any council really interested in solving any perceived problems.
Mary Heslan Te Aro