Letter: Salmon farmers respond . . .

Last updated 12:38 16/05/2012

Relevant offers

Letters to the Editor

More than just one flag at stake Plenty of work needed at stadium Housing plan not part of deal Support makes all the difference Now we're there, do something UN veto power simply farcical Flag change a no-brainer Haircut from a bygone era Sea level rising not all doom and gloom Did this haka go too far?

OPINION: Far from "stuffing" the Marlborough Sounds with salmon farms (Letters, May 3), our total coverage - if our application is granted - would represent 0.01 per cent of the surface area, a mere 17 hectares compared to the 150,000 surface hectares there.

We've had to apply for additional space in "prohibited areas" because there is no suitable space in coastal marine zone 2, which is suitable for mussels and has primarily been set aside for them.

New Zealand retains ownership of all salmon farming space; we have the right only to carry out an activity and the public has access to all areas except for our barges and nets. The local council has approved all our farms, which are independently monitored by the Cawthron Institute on behalf of that council. We stand by our record of sustainable salmon farming for 25 years in the Sounds with no environmental effect detected remote from our farms.

It's now up to the independent board of inquiry established by the Environmental Protection Authority to consider our proposal. We believe that is the appropriate forum and are confident its decisions will be based on fact, not innuendo.

GRANT ROSEWARNE

Chief executive, NZ King Salmon

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content