Letter: Has Harry considered the civilians?

Last updated 12:00 29/01/2013

Relevant offers

Letters to the Editor

Church should not go for 'relevant' Don't support US aggression Council no help to Dowse The code of the cyclist The markets will go on Voter turnout a shame Taser critic does not get the weapon Spineless response to skinny mannequins Let's avoid being a poodle at the UN Woolly thinking with levy logic

OPINION: Prince Harry speaks, with boyish enthusiasm, of his pleasure at killing Taliban soldiers, showing an eye-for-an-eye attitude (Harry ''killed Taliban'' on Afghan tour of duty, Jan 23). I wonder how he distinguishes between Taliban militants and non-combatant villagers, who might also include children. This, while travelling at 500 feet altitude, and at a high defensive speed. He uses a high- powered, fast-spitting weapon that was never designed to distinguish between friend and foe. Has he given this a thought? Unlike PlayStation or the computer games he enjoys, firearms kill real people without distinguishing between their innocence or guilt.

IAN KIDMAN

Hataitai

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content