Letter: When balance is unnecessary

Last updated 12:00 30/01/2013

Relevant offers

Letters to the Editor

Key's return a welcome sight Kate Sheppard snub an embarrassment Teachers not in it for the money It's not perfect, but it's an improvement Learn from the Australian lesson Spying tools necessary evil Stirrers make no difference 'Spying' not accurate term for GCSB work Sheppard's memory disrespected Leave the Treaty where it is

OPINION: Columnist Karl du Fresne's defence of balance in journalism (Opinion, Jan 25) has both merit and drawbacks (a balanced criticism).

For many years, the New Zealand print media bent over backward to provide ''balance'' in discussions on the adverse health effects of tobacco and the effect of greenhouse gases on global warming, thereby giving much comfort to the purveyors of tobacco and fossil fuels.

Tobacco companies lost the battle for balance some time ago in the face of overwhelming evidence of tobacco's adverse health effects, but only lately has the news media accepted that greenhouse gas effects are real and terrifying, and given reduced coverage to the fossil fuel lobby.

Balance in the media is often admirable when dealing with social or political arguments. Balance that gives comfort to lobby groups arguing against overwhelming scientific evidence is far from admirable, especially if politicians can use the ''debate'' to delay taking unpalatable action.

PETER WARING

Eketahuna

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content