Letter: We don't need to redefine marriage

Last updated 12:00 30/01/2013

Relevant offers

Letters to the Editor

Letter: Our beating heart Letter: Show us the facts please, minister Letter: Urgent action needed on legal highs Letter: Students need to be treated equally Letter: Ko deserves funding while finding feet Letter: Policy should always beat popularity Letter: Growth in bike use can only be good Letter: Provinces forgotten come election time Letter: PM should reveal his incomes, taxes Letter: More bikes good for car drivers

OPINION: I have to thank former MP Gordon Copeland for his concise article about the futility of proceeding with the Marriage Redefinition Bill (Opinion, Jan 24). He explains exactly what marriage is and that no other relationship can ever be called ''marriage''.

The children in a marriage can grow up with two biological parents who are committed to each other and to the raising of a family. There is no more solid a foundation for children to grow up in. They are spared the confusion of living with one parent and a step-parent and seeing their other biological parent once a fortnight.

Sadder still are the many adults who must spend time and money to find one of their ''lost'' biological parents. No matter how committed people in other relationships are to each other, theirs can never be called ''marriage''.

CARLA TOLLENAAR

Waikanae

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content