Why I don't eat meat

BY TOM FITZSIMONS
Last updated 09:21 11/09/2009

Yeah, yeah, predictable - I know. The glasses, the wordiness, the affected style - and now a tofu-chomping vegetarian too.

Actually, I'm a bit unsure of my meatless credentials - I've only been on the greens for a year or so, and even in that time I've occasionally relapsed.

And I still eat fish, which means, technically, that I'm no vegetarian at all. I'm actually a pescetarian, or as I prefer it, a veg-aquarian.

But for right or wrong, I've basically given up the meat, so I suppose I should share why. I mean, how could this happen to a young New Zealand male, who grew up on lamb and chicken and beef and all the rest of the farming kingdom?

Nearly everyone I know still gorges on the flesh of our animal brothers and sisters, so why not me?

Well, there wasn't an epiphany. Cows didn't appear in my dreams. I never really thought: that's it.

It was more of a gradual turning around. And I guess it was helped by the following experiences:

* Reading about the killing of animals. Michael Pollan's Omnivore's Dilemma is a great book about food in general, and even though he's still a meat-eater, this made me think a lot about where food comes from. In particular, I wondered: could I personally kill a beast?

* Going to China. The Middle Kingdom is probably a candidate for least vegetarian country in the world. They certainly don't waste a morsel of any slaughtered animal, but I found some parts of the meat menu (chicken feet, etc) to be too close to home.

* My younger brother taking the leap first.

Let's get a few misconceptions out of the way now, and then I'll try to sum up my argument for vegetarianism.

First, I feel no great affinity for animals. I've never had a pet and I don't need to start now.

Second, I don't think animals are the same as humans. They're definitely more stupid than us, at least on average, and I'd willingly see an animal killed to save a human's life.

And third, for the record, my girlfriend is not a vegetarian. Many people assume she's the reason I'm out of the abattoir, but in fact, she's still as carnivorous as ever.

So what's the buzz?

In a sentence, I think it's wrong to cause unnecessary pain to sentient beings, creatures that can feel stuff.

Most people who eat meat will agree intuitively that it's wrong to kill another human. But the real question is: why is it wrong?

Is it just because they're the same as us? Surely not, because that kind of tribal reasoning is what begets racism, and religious fanaticism, and gang warfare, and all kinds of arbitrary crimes.

Or is it because humans possess certain superior traits, certain quantifiable characteristics - like, for example, intelligence?

But of course we don't possess these things uniformly - some people are smarter, some less smart; some more beautiful, some less so; some stronger, some weaker. To defend life because of these things has the ring of eugenics about it.

That's all very abstract. Let me be more concrete: why is it okay to kill an adult pig, but not okay to kill a two-year-old child?

Scientists say the pig is smarter than the child, so intelligence can't be the reason.

And to say it's just because the child is one of us, and the pig is not, is to follow the same sort of reasoning human beings have always traditionally used for killing each other: "They're different to me".

The alternative is to have a morality based, at least to some extent, on pain. Suffering is a universal currency. You don't have to be smart or strong to suffer. You don't have to belong to a race or a species.

This morality says that it's good to ease suffering when you can. It says it's even better to avoid inflicting it at all, if possible.

So it follows that we shouldn't kill the child or the pig - especially when there's so much other food out there.

Look, I haven't broached Mike King and the pig farms (perfectly okay under New Zealand law, but obviously distasteful to the average person - even the Prime Minister called it disturbing).

I haven't mentioned that if we all stopped eating meat, we'd instantly reduce the world's carbon emissions dramatically.

And I haven't revealed that vegetarians live longer.

Because even without all those good reasons, I think we're obliged to become soy-gnashing, chard-munching, broccoli-loving vegetarians.

What say you all?

- © Fairfax NZ News

157 comments
Post a comment
MsM   #1   09:29 am Sep 11 2009

You think if things were different and the pig was the one with opposable thumbs and longer legs, that he wouldn't eat you in an instant? Get them before they get you I say ;)

Lane Nichols   #2   09:32 am Sep 11 2009

Peace, love and mungbeans brother. I reckon Churchouse is more stupid than a pig.

Chilli   #3   09:34 am Sep 11 2009

I say I would love to but I don't have the willpower! I pretty much only eat chicken and fish anyway so that's good enough for me. I also usually prefer the vege option in restaurants, and as I am surrounded by vegetarians who cook amazing food I wouldn't find it too difficult to make the transition if it weren't for how much I love chicken enchiladas. Selfish? Perhaps. Realistic? Definitely.

Interweb Guy   #4   09:35 am Sep 11 2009

No wonder you look so pale compared to the other two! But in all seriousness, I love my meat, have killed and slaughtered it myself so am fully aware of were it comes from. Just a point though, you say you dont see the point in causing unnecessary suffering. Do you think that the animal is going to live forever? It is going to die some time, and in most cases where is has died from natural causes it is a far longer drawn out suffering than the quick killing that takes place for meat.

mmm meat

Kalu Rinpoche   #5   09:35 am Sep 11 2009

Look at those good men, they don't eat meat. But they do drink tea. To grow tea, first the ground need to be plowed, which kills many little animals who live in the ground. Those who lived above ground go under and die, those who lived underground get above and die, and some others are just cut in half, so they could just as well drink a cup of blood.

Where's the line on what suffering you should/shouldn't avoid causing?

paul   #6   09:46 am Sep 11 2009

It is worth noting that pigs are also omnivores, and an adult pig is not much smarter than a child. An adult pig is as smart as it's going to get. A child can grow up and be smart enough to be president (George Dubya isn't a good example of this argument of course).

I have no issue with vegetarians, but I always think of it as being some kind of disability. If you don't like meat, then don't eat it. I'm the same with aniseed - the very stink of it makes me nauseous.

But please don't bother trying to justify your lifestyle choices - cos we really don't care.

Scott   #7   09:47 am Sep 11 2009

I don't believe that EVERY meal must have meat in it. I've even been known to order vegetarian when eating out, and I deliberately eat tofu. I guess I consider it to be a case of balance. To put this in perspective though - I've worked on the slaughterboard at one of our still open freezing works, and even spent time in the beef house there. That pretty much killed any sensitive feelings I might ever have felt for animals - 90% of which would never have lived if mankind were vegetarians.

NoAngel   #8   09:48 am Sep 11 2009

I have a vegetarian friend, he's a builder, ripped and muscled, plays drums in a band weekly, runs around after his 8yr son, is very lean but seems very healthy - so clearly lack of meat doesn't have an adverse affect.

Accepting what other people want/need/enjoy is all part of being open to our friends, new cultures, religous beliefs, etc.

But I will always remember a call I received when looking for a flatmate(waaaaayy back when), and this chick asked whether her being a vegetarian would be a problem. Absolutely not, I sincerely replied, although noting that I was engaged to a butcher. I was hung up on. Go figure :)

Nick Churchouse   #9   09:54 am Sep 11 2009

Tom, I'm not going to kill a broccoli just because it is different to me either. We might be a different colour but sometimes we have the same bushy hairdo, and that's enough for me. I resent the fact you target my broccoli brothers. That said, we are alike in that I'd happily see a carrot killed to save a human life. Or even a tomato. What about killing a kiwifruit to save a pig that was going to eat a two year old child? Why not just throw heaps of veges, some bananas and a mango, a couple of mixed race toddlers and a lamb into a pen and see who wins? Have I missed your point? Is cage fighting part of this? I don't agree with cage fighting. Cages have feelings too.

Catriona   #10   09:56 am Sep 11 2009

I'm predicting an aggressive rant from the meat-eaters here. But well done for standing up and making such a persuasive argument.


Show 11-60 of 157 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content