Tough test drains plumbers' brains

Last updated 09:20 06/05/2009
ROBERT KITCHIN/The Dominion Post
NOTHING BEATS EXPERIENCE: Joe Field has been an apprentice to boss Jeff Clisby for four years, but failed his craftsman exam first time.

Relevant offers

News

Alleyway assault images released Demolition consent for historic buildings Waka paddles into more strife Deaf man 'just wanted friendship' CTV building not up to code No alternative to moving Whanganui childbirths Dragons, treasure, fireworks - a lively weekend Morrison fought aggressive cancer We put your bus questions to council Tributes to Lloyd Morrison

Just one in 15 plumbing apprentices are passing an important industry exam, sparking claims that its requirements are too hard.

The Plumbers, Gasfitters and Drainlayers Board has begun an inquiry into the low pass rate. "The board has decided that a candidate's failure is ours as well," chairwoman Hazel Armstrong said in the board's latest newsletter. "Obtaining registration should not be a demoralising lottery."

To become registered plumbers and gasfitters, apprentices must pass five exams set by the board. In November, 60 apprentices sat the "craftsman plumbing" exam, which candidates must pass before they can set up plumbing businesses. Only four passed.

Chief examiner Roy Daniel said candidates appeared to have done insufficient preparation.

A total of 751 apprentices sat six plumbing, drainlayer and gasfitting examinations in November, with 272 pass marks given out.

Ms Armstrong said there was no standard textbook for apprentices to study, or for tutors to teach to.

Apprentice plumber Joe Field, 28, said he had spent nine years in the industry, of which four were as an apprentice under the tuition of his boss, Jeff Clisby. He passed plumbing and gasfitting registration exams but narrowly failed the craftsman exam in 2007.

He found the $300 fee an impediment to resitting it, but was optimistic about eventually passing his three remaining exams.

The poor results have come as no surprise to former board chairman and chief examiner Harold Thomas, who resigned from the board in 2000. He said the current examination system set the bar too high for plumbing and gasfitting apprentices.

"An academic nightmare has unnecessarily been visited upon a very practical industry. It is the apprentices who are suffering badly," Waikanae-based Mr Thomas said.

"They are leaving the industry in a beaten and disillusioned state. I feel for them."

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

5 comments
Post a comment
john dyer   #5   04:07 pm Jun 25 2009

I blame this situation on exams being set by office workers and not plumbers also I was always taught that you will need to look at the regs/standards/manufacters instructions and not to relie on your memory as you can make mistakes. Also the plumbers board is destroying an honourable profession and are way behind the times ,they like to make rules but dont police them example I came to NZ because immigration said that I could start my business up here like back in the Uk,unfortunately immigration and pgdb dont talk . So anyway ive worked for 2 business here with no supervision from the craftsman whilst working on plumbing and gas work This i was told by the craftsmen was ok because they knew that UK trained people were some of the best in the world and the pgdb knows this happens but do nothing because like in Taupo most businesses have 1 craftsman to 6 trainees or non registered so how do you expect these trainee plumbers to pass exams when the craftsman is to busy making money from them

RICHARD   #4   11:05 pm May 12 2009

There needs to be an independent audit done on papers that have narrowly failed. On my last attempt I could prove 8 answers marked wrong were deemed to be correct in the study publications provided. after a re-marking of my paper I was given the necessary mark to pass on an obscure question that I had not picked up on. There are many cases like this. The standard of the units delivered to the apprentices is low. There has been a history of conflict with many parties responsible for the education of the apprentices and setting of the exams. To blame the failure rate on poor preparation by the trainee year after year is a disgrace. The people who have been given the task of educating and ensuring the growth of our industry should hang their heads in shame

Jeanette   #3   08:34 am May 07 2009

They should review which questions the apprentices were failing on. I happen to have a friend who failed the exam, and even his boss couldn't answer some of the questions. If the students are all failing on the same questions, then it's the question at fault, not the students. How many plumbers know what "absolute zero" is, and which answer is correct. It depends on which answer the questionnaire wanted. A vague question will give many possible answers.

Peter Selwyn   #2   08:05 am May 07 2009

A high failure rate is not unexpected when for whatever reason those at the top may have or do still have still beleive that the Craftsman Exam can only be undertaken in a "closed book" situation. How rediculous is that, after nearly 40 years in the game I still refer to the regulations and NZ Standards so how is a newby in the trade suppost to not only know but fully understand all of these documents and then NOT be able to use them in an exam. Lets get real I know of no other trade with such stringent or restrictive practices that set annual exams for apprentices.

Ali the wana be plumber   #1   06:43 pm May 06 2009

A slight misrepresentation say this man is sitting craftsman exams .After four years he would be sitting registration exams . It takes six years minimum to be a craftsman plumber only a craftsman plumber can take out building consent in that trade .For every one hundred people whom embark on an plumbing apprenticeship only 1 will become a craftsman plumber .

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bicycle helmets be mandatory?

Yes- They save lives and prevent injury

Yes- But only for children

No - It is a personal choice

I don’t care

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content