Kapiti road plan greeted with dismay

By KAY BLUNDELL - The Dominion Post
Last updated 05:00 22/08/2009

Related Links

Coast road route 'outrageous'

Relevant offers

Central North Island

Wairarapa police load excessive 'for years' Coast road route 'outrageous' Guilty plea in samurai sword case Girl, 3, dies in hospital Life in a goldfish bowl Police chase man along Desert Rd Costly Taupo domain plan worries residents Tui Brewery seeks river discharge permit Minister set bad precedent - educator Councils review contracts with QV

Kapiti Coast residents fear a proposed four-lane expressway through the district will have huge impacts on small coastal villages and businesses.

Transport Minister Steven Joyce has presented the community with two designations for a four-lane expressway between McKays Crossing and Peka Peka that feature only two access points at Poplar Ave in Raumati South and at Otaihanga, north of Paraparaumu.

Community representatives say both options will jeopardise small community businesses reliant on traffic from the highway.

Paekakariki-Raumati councillor Lyndy McIntyre said the options were appalling. "Thousands of cars and trucks pouring off the highway at the Poplar Ave southern access will have a huge effect on the character of the small coastal village."

Ms McIntyre said the six weeks the New Zealand Transport Agency had allowed for submissions was not long enough for communities to assess the full impact of the proposal.

Waikanae Community Board chairman Michael Scott feared the options could be the death knell for long-awaited plans for a second bridge over Waikanae River, included in the Western Link Rd route.

"If the Government spends this money on upgrading State Highway 1 why would they also fork out for another bridge over the river and a local road?"

Former councillor Barry Mansell welcomed the proposal, saying the council had "dumbed down" the Western Link Rd by reducing it to two lanes, giving the transport minister no option but to resolve the problem of congestion on the highway into Wellington.

"There are 25,000 vehicles a day using the highway let's just get on and do it."

Coastlands spokeswoman Jan Forrest said an expressway with access only at Raumati South and Otaihanga would have dramatic effects on not only Coastlands but lots of small businesses lining the highway. "It will have a huge impact on the whole community. Local roads were not designed for heavy volumes."

Paraparaumu Airport owner Noel Robinson congratulated Mr Joyce for stepping in to fast-track some action. "Ongoing delays in improving infrastructure have held the district back for years."

Raumati-Paraparaumu councillor Anne Molineux also welcomed Mr Joyce's intervention, saying the council's procrastination on the link road had forced his hand.

Labour list MP Darren Hughes said it was arrogant for the Government to give the community and affected landowners only six weeks to respond to the two expressway options.

Ad Feedback
12 comments
Post a comment
Alister   #12   04:06 pm Oct 01 2009

Bypasses for Otaki, Paraparaumu and Waikanae are long overdue. These bottlenecks are a constant annoyance, especially during long weekends. And for Otaki, during any weekend, as people dawdle through trying to find a park for the numerous outlet shops that are now the scurge on a main road.

Please build a proper road, and the sooner the better.

Anne   #11   03:11 pm Sep 16 2009

A highway of 4 lanes along the Western Link designation would mean that the Govt organises and pays for this, and the 2 lane would not be built and paid for by locals; and then as well, the locals inherit the present State highway as their local connecting road to Waikanae with no slowing roundabouts thus enabling a fast passage up to 100kmh (being far superior to this 2-lane Western Link). A win/win situation for Kapiti district - so WHY has the Council got blinkers on for an eastern expressway? Incredible BLANK there!!!

natalie   #10   11:47 am Aug 28 2009

I live in Aorangi Rd, Paraparaumu. My partner and I just bought this house last year because we have lived on the coast for most of our lives and love it here, we want a nice home to raise a family. Now we get a pamphlet in the mail telling us that of the 2 main options being considered we would either end up living with a motorway in our front yard, our house value shot and our lovely safe little neighbourhood ruined; or our house ends up having negative equity and we lose it or the Government? buys our home for probably a fraction of its market value ( which wouldn’t be worth much if this proposal goes ahead) and we end up having to buy something less nice perhaps.

Having lived on the coast for most of my life however I do appreciate the need for some improvement in the roading area but what would happen to the current road? Would it still be used, the expensive and relatively new Lindale interchange? I mean the proposed ideas see a large amount of homes destroyed not to mention the cost in lifestyle to those of us who live in the affected area, it would also go through lovely established rural areas, brand new subdivisions, Lindale and Whitireia?

Can the existing highway not be upgraded? Would that not be easier and cheaper? Especially when you take into account the environmental impact, monetary cost and human lives affected…

I for one am very concerned and upset by these prospects and I am not alone.

What about transmission gully? Western link road? If you build an expressway as proposed, however fancy and it is still the only route out of Wellington what happens in event of earthquake/storm etc?

How would you like your home destroyed?

Steve   #9   01:56 pm Aug 27 2009

Option 1 avoiding all town centres is the only logical option. You can't put a 4-lane highway through Waikanae that's just plain crazy! Imagine the bottlenecks!! Think of the pollution brought into what is barely a village. Take it through the countryside where fewer people will be affected.

Andrew F   #8   12:06 pm Aug 27 2009

I would like to say to everyone in Kapiti. Please have your say through the submission form. There are numerous family’s affected by the proposed WLR, these people have been wondering when it will be built and how long before it goes from 70 Km\Hr local road to 100 Km\Hr bypass. The government has come up with what I think are 2 reasonable concepts. Both offer what the community has been asking for, a second bridge over the Waikanae River and a local link road between Waikanae and Paraparaumu.

Kara   #7   07:46 am Aug 27 2009

Thank you Minister. Let's get going. Option 2. Get the job done and dusted.

Andrew   #6   06:29 pm Aug 25 2009

The only reason that this is an issue is because everyone has spent six decades talking about it. The US marines offered to do Transmission Guly for us during the Second World War but narrow mindedness at the time stopped that in it's tracks. Kapiti roading is woeful and it's no longer funny. No one is suggesting turning you into Las Vegas, it's about improving things for you. As for the comment by Thomas that slow driving saves on accidents, my friend, your logic is way out, in this case. If you drive at 100-110 kph, assuming appropriate conditions, you reduce frustration and everyone drives in a reasonable fashion. Doing 65-70 and restricting flow on the open road is illegal.

Wayne   #5   09:35 am Aug 24 2009

The expressway is needed. I guess the next stage is to ensure all those impacted are sorted out as soon as is reasonably possible. I think it unfortunate that KCDC have favored rhetoric over action and left the Govt with no real alternatives.

jeremy   #4   09:14 pm Aug 23 2009

It is painfully clear that the process should be the issue. There have been endless convolutions of the coast highway/link. Of the many proposals none have stuck. The reason is because the process has never been done in a thoughtful way. All the the changes in plans act as an indictment of how the government is conducting business. This is very wasteful and causes a great deal of disenfranchisement. How many people will come to meetings that take place over the same issue for the tenth time with no finality?????

Thomas Simmons   #3   04:29 pm Aug 23 2009

"The people who complain about this new road are the cause why we need it in the first place.And by that i mean the one's that drive between 65-70kph,having endless queue's behind them,with the lack of regard to other motorists.If the traffic flowed better,delays and congestion will at least be reduced."

Lack of regard? Who are you kidding. The chances of death at 90-110 kph are vastly greater than at 65-70. The slower drivers are the smarter drivers who truly have a higher regard for their fellow humans whilst the bumper-to-bumper crowd are no better than thugs who shove a shotgun in your face.

And slower drivers consume less foreign petroleum and keep our national trade deficit down.


Show 1-2 of 12 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you sign in, you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions