Key part of dam plan a footnote: Fish & Game

Last updated 05:00 14/12/2013

Relevant offers

Hawke's Bay

Designer invited to prestigious showcase John Key's car egged in Napier Apology, payout over prisoner's death Man shot in Gisborne Sports coach manipulated girl Who will turn two towns' lights off? Crosses honour soldiers' sacrifice 'I knew I had killed him' - officer Port profits to pay for dam, almost Lock down at Marineland proves tricky

Fish & Game has urged the board of inquiry hearing the Ruataniwha dam proposal to decline the resource consent applications, and claims one of the most important aspects of the scheme was relegated to a footnote.

The organisation made opening submissions on Thursday, with its experts continuing to give evidence yesterday.

Lawyer Sue Simons said the organisation was not opposed to dams, agriculture or horticulture, but the proposed irrigation scheme and dam, and the associated plan change by Hawke's Bay Regional Council, were destined to result in unsustainable management of the Tukituki River catchment.

She repeated other submitters' concerns about a lack of evidence that managing just one nutrient, phosphorus, but not nitrogen too, would result in deteriorating water quality, and said the length of time it would take for nitrogen's effects to be noticed meant proposed consent conditions "will be ineffective".

Fish & Game was also concerned about the suggested actions should a problem arise.

These were covered in the footnote to a policy, which mentioned a yet-to-be-developed "procedural guideline" that would include unidentified "progressively more stringent on-farm management practices" to tackle excess nitrogen and whether resource consents could reverse the situation.

"It appears that this matter is of such importance to the regional council that it has only managed to find its way into a footnote," Ms Simons said.

The six-week hearing, which began in Hastings last month, continues in Waipawa next week, before breaking over Christmas.

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News


Special offers
Opinion poll

Would you support your local council paying the 'living wage'?

Yes - it's moral and fair, no matter the costs.

Yes, but there should be a cap on the wage.

Only for the very lowest waged.

Not at all - survival of the fittest.

Don't know/Not sure.

Vote Result

Related story: Council's living wage blowout

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content