Anti-fluoride campaigner loses case

Last updated 13:19 16/07/2014

Relevant offers

Kapiti

Police graduate follows proud family tradition Repair bill skyrockets as Kapiti council mops up second flood in a month Second flood in a month takes its toll on Kapiti as clean-up begins Finding the wild side of Kapiti for Wellington On a Plate Floods and Rockquest win make it a special night for Peyton Morete Revamped council rulebook gets first public outing after community revolt David Cunningham is cycling over 50 mountains in France for Halberg Trust Kapiti Coast mopping up after flooding Flood threat sees Kapiti parks closed as Coast faces heavy rain warning Flood warning for Kapiti as region eyes day-long burst of heavy rain

A Kapiti Coast anti-fluoride campaigner has lost his court case to have a conflict of interest declared for a councillor who voted in a tied fluoridation poll in 2010.

Mike Woods said he would not take the court action any further, but he would continue his work in the fluoride debate.

"We have a rock-solid case against fluoride," he said today.

A High Court judge has dismissed Woods' application to review the role of then deputy mayor Ann Chapman who was also on MidCentral District Health Board when a fluoride vote was taken in 2010.

The vote was tied and the mayor refused to make a casting vote so fluoridation continued.

The vote was 8-2 in favour of fluoridation when the council voted again last month.

Woods wanted declarations that Chapman had a conflict of interest that should have been publicly acknowledged.

In addition, she should not have voted because she was a member of a district health board, which was obliged to promote fluoridation, Woods said.

But Justice David Collins dismissed his case.

In his decision the judge said before the 2010 vote councillors were warned of their responsibilities to have an open mind in doing their duty on the council. A fair-minded observer would not think Chapman would have ignored the advice, the judge said.

The council filed submissions in the case but did not appear at the hearing. Chapman did not take part in the case.

The parties had agreed that no costs would be awarded.


Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

How many coffees do you have a day?

5 or even more

3-4

2

1

Anything from 1-5.

Don't touch the stuff.

Vote Result

Related story: Coffee as we know it at risk of dying

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content