An extra month for say on Kapiti's coastal zones

Last updated 13:26 01/02/2013

Relevant offers


Pasifika wardens nearly on the beat in Porirua Paraparaumu couple cannot sell house adjacent to expressway construction Poplar Avenue is remarked as expressway construction continues Once-social work student and musician Fabienne Joni Sopacua on Kapiti Arts Trail Paraparaumu house destroyed by fire Crash family fights for help Paekakariki residents seek clarification on Beach Rd median strip ticketing Raumati Station Action Group call for fuller survey into station's viability Tennis star Leela Beattie to play for Paraparaumu Beach Tennis Club Kapiti food truck event a hit

Kapiti Coast District Council has again been accused of "questionable science" and lack of consultation over its controversial shoreline hazard zones.

The council met yesterday to discuss extending consultation on the predicted 50-year and 100-year shorelines in its district plan, and allowed an extra month.

The council announced the predictions about three months ago, and they affect about 1800 property owners who fear their valuations and insurance will be hit.

Marine ecologist Philip Tortell, of Paekakariki, told the meeting he had worked for the United Nations in developing countries for 23 years, and public consultation was "paramount" in that work.

"I involve people from the highest political and decision-making levels to fishing communities and desert nomads.

"Serious consultation and involvement require the public to be invited to contribute and their contributions must be given due consideration . . . before serious decisions are made."

It was arrogant to assume that, because technical matters were involved, the public would not understand, he said.

Rather than adopting a participatory approach, "the council placed affected ratepayers on the defensive, rather than a collaborative search for consensus on how Kapiti can manage this risk".

Coastal Ratepayers United spokesman Chris Ruthe questioned the scientific data behind the report on which the hazard lines were based.

The group has repeatedly asked the council for the raw data so it can gather other expert opinion.

"Why not embrace a genuine consultation process and defer the proposed district plan hearing strictures?" Mr Ruthe said.

Council strategy and partnerships group manager Gael Ferguson said the effects of climate change and impacts of coastal erosion had been discussed with the community for many years, and the district plan process provided opportunity for public comment.

Councillor Diane Ammundsen stressed that the council was following Resource Management Act process.

The council voted to extend consultation on the coastal hazard maps from March 1 to April 2, and decided independent commissioners would be used for hearings on the issue.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post


Special offers
Opinion poll

How many coffees do you have a day?

5 or even more




Anything from 1-5.

Don't touch the stuff.

Vote Result

Related story: Coffee as we know it at risk of dying

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content