Big-earning beneficiaries to be audited

Last updated 11:05 17/08/2009

Relevant offers

Politics

Call to share information on vulnerable children Brownlee admits 'clown' comment went too far Halt oil exploration, Govt urged $1m jump in MPs' travel at election time One News investigated in police probe MPs spent $3.1m on travel expenses Seas law puts 'economy before environment' John Key's radio show referred to police Ties, boots and sausages on minds of new MPs Does David Shearer want to be Tony Blair?

The 50 people who receive the most money in social welfare payments will be audited, Social Development Minister Paula Bennett says.

More than 300 beneficiaries receive more than $1000 a week and many in the top 50 have more than eight children.

Among those to be audited are a couple, both on the unemployment benefit for 15 years, with 10 children who receive $1200 a week, the New Zealand Herald reported.

Prime Minister John Key said he supported the audit of the top 50 beneficiaries.

"Should we look at it, I think so.

"I think the taxpayer is entitled to know, at least, it's been properly distributed," he told TV One's Breakfast.

Everyone gets the same base rate benefit and the couple who received $1200 would likely get add-ons such as an accommodation supplement or childcare assistance, he said.

The family's details became available following a question from Labour in Parliament, Mr Key said.

Ms Bennett said there were "isolated cases where it seems like a lot of money".

"I think it needs to be fair, so we are ensuring people are getting what they need, but not more than they are entitled to."

Labour MP Annette King said the 168 on the DPB getting more than $1000 a week were a small proportion of the 104,000 people on that benefit.

- NZPA

Ad Feedback
7 comments
Post a comment
Fred   #7   08:38 am Aug 18 2009

I am all for helping those who truly need it. An audit will determine that. National is doing the right thing. In these tough economic times we have to make sure that our tax dollars are well spent. I am convinced that there are many who game the system and it is those who deserved to be identified and punished if necessary.

Leah   #6   06:42 am Aug 18 2009

Special circumstances? Sure, each to their own, but 10 children??!

I think the special circumstance here should've been that they kept their legs closed!

giovanni   #5   10:45 pm Aug 17 2009

just another smart move from key and his pack, get the attention off their own greediness and put it on the beneficiaries, one wonders who the next one will be. pensioners ?

Murray   #4   04:57 pm Aug 17 2009

"Should we look at it, I think so."

Well, don't talk about it - just go and bloody look at it, then.

As Annette King has said, you lot are setting all these hound dogs loose. It is a repeat of the distaste which surrounded the individuals involved in the Training Assistance Allowance. The average person hasn't got a clue about all the exceptional circumstances which are able to be involved, as Socialist Craig(#3) has described.

If I said it once at the time of the election, I said it half a dozen times; if National win we are likely to return to the distrust and suspicion of the Jenny Shipley days (oh, she is now Dame Jenny Shipley, isn't she? - she is no less controversial - and the bickering came from the top down). The priceless, enjoyable gloss of goodwill we had come to take for granted will erode bit by bit.

Our cohesive society will be lost.

I know a family who struggle so admirably due to more than one of a number their children having an awful condition called hydrocephalitis.

This crap must be making them feel rotten.

Socialist Craig   #3   03:31 pm Aug 17 2009

Those beneficiaries on $1000+ have, in the main, high costs, usually medical. For example, a recipient on the DPB Caring For Sick and Infirm will receive a base entitlement of $312.62 (sole parent rate), added to which will possibly be FTC (that will depend on the number of children), Child Disability Allowance (that will depend on the number of high needs children), Accommodation Supplement (depends on area in NZ, plus family size), Disability Allowance and Temporary Addition Support. Yes, these figures may appear high; however, you would need to know the story behind each person's circumstance before passing judgement.

giovanni   #2   03:20 pm Aug 17 2009

You forgot something bruce lol what about the smoking marijuana

Bruce Byron   #1   02:07 pm Aug 17 2009

$1200.00 a week, plus add ons, maybe a state or council house, but at least an accommodation supplement. No work for 15 years, just shopping, television, playing with the kids, having time for the kids, okay.. where do I sign on, seriously, I will quit my job right now, no more damn taxes, working extra hours to pay bills, not getting to spend time with the kids that I could afford to bring into the world, I want in and also want to know why this opportunity is not advertised.!!!!

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bicycle helmets be mandatory?

Yes- They save lives and prevent injury

Yes- But only for children

No - It is a personal choice

I don’t care

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content