Three strikes law passes

Last updated 17:46 25/05/2010

Relevant offers


Government denies report NZ SAS in combat in Iraq Why the selfie election has given way to the Facebook campaign Who named the Ministry for Vulnerable Children, Oranga Tamariki? Once flea-covered student flat one of the first inspected in Government crackdown Hekia Parata's trials and tribulations as Education Minister Government moves to make dairy industry more competitive Shamubeel Eaqub: Immigration an emotionally charged topic John Key heads to India as Indian students face deportation from NZ over visa fraud Long-term infrastructure spending jumps $15b, but leans heavily on local govt Labour leader Andrew Little visits Marlborough for party's 100th anniversary

The controversial "three strikes" bill has just been passed into law.

The bill provides for repeat violent offenders to face maximum jail terms with no parole for a third conviction for one of 40 specified offence.

Under the graduating scale of sanctions within the law, murderers must be jailed for life with no parole if the murder conviction is for a second or subsequent "strike" offence, unless the judge rules a non-parole sentence would be manifestly unjust.

The law will see offenders who commit one of the 40 crimes sentenced as normal, with the usual parole eligibility, for a first strike.

A second strike will bring a sentence under normal criteria, but the jail term must be served with no parole unless doing so would be manifestly unjust.

A third strike will bring a maximum sentence for that crime, with no parole.

The 40 crimes in the schedule include murder, manslaughter, rape and other sexual offending and serious violence.

The Sentencing and Parole Bill that lays out the three strikes regime was opposed by a range of groups, including lawyers and prison reformers.

It passed with the support of National and Act, which made a three strikes bill a key part of its 2008 election campaign.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post


Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content