Innovation needed to boost economy

TRACY WATKINS AND VERNON SMALL
Last updated 05:00 22/05/2011
Sir Paul Callaghan told the Labour Party conference he wants New Zealand to build on creative genius.
KEVIN STENT

UP IN ARMS: Sir Paul Callaghan told the Labour Party conference he wants New Zealand to build on creative genius.

Relevant offers

Politics

Crunch time for public service changes Treaty obligations to stay in asset sales McCully email thief could be Kiwi PSA disappointed Key won't discuss cuts PM invited to press 'play' on teapot tape Defence boss: Hard decisions take toll ACC work account competition delayed Ministry 'failed its own national standards' McCully emails criticised foreign affairs ministry Labour fears for Kiwis in ministry shake-up

Top scientist Sir Paul Callaghan says New Zealand is a poor nation because we work at low-wage activities.

"We have the capacity to be prosperous, but we choose not to be," the New Zealander of the Year said in a speech to the Labour Party congress yesterday.

Thursday's budget has been criticised for its lack of a coherent plan for economic growth, when Callaghan said New Zealanders were looking for a vision "about where we can go as a country".

There was a disparity between rich and poor compared with other developed countries, productivity was near the bottom of the OECD despite Kiwis working longer than those in other developed countries, and we were failing to capitalise on a school system that performed highly in international comparisons.

Callaghan challenged Prime Minister John Key's emphasis on tourism as a means of boosting wealth, saying to meet National's goal of catching Australia, businesses would have to produce an extra $40 billion in exports.

"Instead of 1000 people visiting Milford Sound every week, we'd need 60,000," he said, and even then New Zealand would remain behind because tourism created only $80,000 in revenue per job annually.

He compared that with Fonterra, which created $350,000 per job annually, or US-based Apple computers, which produced $1m-plus per job.

"The more tourism, the poorer we get. Tourism is a great industry, but it cannot be a route to prosperity."

There were innovative companies that collectively earned New Zealand around $4 billion a year in exports. To create an extra $40b in revenue, New Zealand only needed to foster another 100 of those. That requires entrepreneurial genius.

But the most important thing was creating an environment they wanted to live in, because creative genius was mobile. "Creative people don't want to live in gated communities with poverty on their doorstep."

Labour leader Phil Goff told the conference he was ready to unveil a boost for research, science and skills training, and that an end to an existing government programme would fund it. He said the increase would build on Callaghan's call for more spending on innovation.

He said asset sales and KiwiSaver cuts made New Zealand's debt problem worse, with the deficit expected to peak at a record $16.7b this year before falling to $9.7b next year.

Deputy leader Annette King told the 500 delegates she had dropped plans to announce a major plank in the party's children's policy because a few days after the Budget was not the right time. However, she said Labour would scrap the Families Commission and fold some of its work into a new Children's Ministry.

King said the commission had a budget of $7.7m compared with $4.5m for Women's Affairs. She said it was astounding there was a minister for racehorses, rugby and senior citizens, but not for "the most vulnerable in our community."

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

6 comments
Post a comment
Jerry   #6   01:28 pm May 23 2011

Paul Callighan is absolutely correct in what he states, but why on earth would this man make these suggestions to a Labour Party. They have no comprehension of investment in innovative development unless that comprises the creative restructuring of a welfare department or such other drain on the economy.

ggyyakl   #5   01:10 pm May 23 2011

#3 Roy Do you know that physicy and economics (especially econometrics) have a lot in common e.g. using same formulaes, because they both are mathmatic based science and math is based on logic. The numbers quoted by Sir Paul are very comparable and clearly demonstrate what leads the economy. Do you really believe that you have to be an economist to be able to understand such easy concept? or is it way to simple for you to understand?

You do not have to be an expert to have an opinion, everyone has the ability to evaluate science and its applications by asking what is it about and its merit, how to achieve it, cost/benefit. That are basically what scientist ask themselves all the time as well. It is all about logic and everyone has the capacity to get involved.

Good on you Labour for taking on his advise, a + for you. It always surprises me that Innovation is not on Nat's priority list, given that the importance of innovation is so well established in the macroeconomics theories.

jackp   #4   12:50 pm May 23 2011

Sir Paul Callighan is right, but talking to the wrong people. Under labour, the brain drain was high. Now we have brain drain that owe New Zealand billions in student loans. I don't think either major party has a solution. National wants to sell off assets to their buddies and Labour wants to tax both are horrible ways to bring in income. I support Dr Brash because he will bring down spending and has a plan to increase production. Both parties are so afraid of making the tough choices and New Zealand is sinking. Sickens me to see this because New Zealand could be a great country, but lacks the leadership.

Roy   #3   11:16 am May 23 2011

Sir Paul is a physicist. How does that qualify him to make any statements about industry or the economy? Part of competence is knowing where your competence runs out. My opinion of Sir Paul is greatly decreased by his choice to mouth off about things he knows nothing about.

Slaine   #2   10:10 am May 23 2011

Seeing as Rogernomics was born Labour and Labour was in charge for 9 years during the mid 90s, perhaps it needs to point the finger at itself then and make some fundamental philosophical changes.

Ivan Taklue   #1   04:47 pm May 22 2011

At last a New Zealander with brains has spoken about the lack of vision and understanding of what is required to improve the prosperity of New Zealanders. Its a shame the Dipstick from Dipton cant articulate the issues in this way and translate into solutions. Any idiot can formulate reduced spending to save money, but what about spending money to make money. I guess thats why the Dipton Dipstick is a politican and not a businessman. I'd love to see these policy makers run a business and try and make wages each month.

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bicycle helmets be mandatory?

Yes- They save lives and prevent injury

Yes- But only for children

No - It is a personal choice

I don’t care

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content