National will back Dunne for Ohariu

DANYA LEVY
Last updated 13:24 22/07/2011

Relevant offers

Politics

Crunch time for public service changes Treaty obligations to stay in asset sales McCully email thief could be Kiwi PSA disappointed Key won't discuss cuts PM invited to press 'play' on teapot tape Defence boss: Hard decisions take toll ACC work account competition delayed Ministry 'failed its own national standards' McCully emails criticised foreign affairs ministry Labour fears for Kiwis in ministry shake-up

National has done a deal with the United Future Party and will campaign for the party vote in the Wellington electorate of Ohariu to help leader Peter Dunne retain the seat.

National Party president Peter Goodfellow said it was up to the voters of Ohariu to make their own decisions about what they did with their electorate vote. However, National would be running a strong party vote campaign.

"In Ohariu, as in all local campaigns, we will be emphasising that the National Party needs strong support if it is to form another John Key-led National Government. If that's what voters want then our message is simple, give National your party vote."

Goodfellow has outlined the party's position just hours after Ohariu National candidate Katrina Shanks indicated she would be campaigning hard in the electorate, saying she was not aware of a deal with Dunne.

Shanks said although a deal between National and United Future was not her decision to make, she didn't believe earlier comments by Prime Minister John Key suggested a deal had been done.

``I'm not aware of any decision that's been made where a deal has been done with Peter Dunne,'' she said.

Although the electorate has changed names and faced boundary changes over the years, Dunne has held the seat for either Labour or United Future since 1984.

However, his majority has been declining and in 2008 he gained just 1006 votes more than Labour's Charles Chauvel and 2294 votes more than Shanks. That was down from a majority of 12,534 in 2002.

It is understood recent polling by Labour puts Chauvel ahead of both Shanks and Dunne.

Green Party candidate Gareth Hughes has said he will only campaign for the party vote in Ohariu and will encourage Green supporters to give their electorate vote to Chauvel.

In April Key signalled he would follow a similar strategy in Ohariu to the strategy the party is following in Epsom; National would only campaign for the party vote in order to assist its support partner ACT back to Parliament. Like United Future, ACT's low polling means its political survival depends on winning an electorate seat.

Dunne said National's approach was consistent with indications given by Prime Minister John Key in April.

"This is good sense if voters want a strong second term National-led government, but as always, the voters will decide."

The deal also made sense in light of the agreement between Labour and the Greens, he said.

"Given their apparent moral objection to ACT and National aligning interests in Epsom, their actions here in Ohariu are hypocritical to say the least."

Ad Feedback

Ohariu voters were "educated and politically sophisticated", Dunne said. He was confident that they would think through the implications of their vote.

"It is coming down to whether they want a centrist or a left wing MP in Ohariu... (I) will stand on my record of delivering as an effective MP who works hard for the electorate, because it is where I live and work."

- © Fairfax NZ News

17 comments
Post a comment
PDD   #17   06:07 pm Sep 26 2011

In my view the ultimate vote would be Candiate Labour, Party vote National , and drop kick Dunn out to his pension . I'm concerned that national is not contesting. Its like the All Blacks throwing a game to get a better deal in the quarters. So much for national making thousands of Civil Servants redundant in the name of prosperity , and using tax payer money to keep this Clown (DUNN) employed . They would serve us better in making him NZ's embassy commissioner to Libya

Dean Hyde   #16   06:24 am Jul 26 2011

Peter Dunne's ability to compromise in order to serve in a Ministerial post is well known. Why would the electors of Ohariu want such a self serving individual as there elected representative? It will all change on the 26th, bye Peter and hello Charles!

geoffrey   #15   08:57 am Jul 24 2011

deals get done all the time.ask the minister of police ,ask hime who can do wot ever they like in new zealand

GetReal   #14   06:59 pm Jul 23 2011

Peter Dunne is a has been, his time has come and gone.

Go Peter go! Go off into the lime light and let some fresh minds in.

Desmond Ng   #13   04:12 pm Jul 23 2011

Peter Dunne is a stale career politician with nothing new to add. This guy epitomises 'dead wood'.

Anthony Micallef   #12   04:09 pm Jul 23 2011

What a circus.The government and the media wants us to believe that they have such a huge majority in the opinion polls that they can carry on by themselves.If this is so why carry on with this farce with the Maori Party, ACT and Epsom and Peter Dunne.I suppose the truth is as far from the opinion poll as New Zealand is from America.

Frank Macskasy   #11   11:14 pm Jul 22 2011

Peter Dunne should simply drop this charade; join National; and campaign openly as a National candidate.

That would at least be more honest than this "nudge, nudge, wink, wink" game-playing that is going on.

Nathan   #10   07:43 pm Jul 22 2011

Good riddance to Peter Dunne. Waste of space.

HDC   #9   07:29 pm Jul 22 2011

This deal highlights everything that is wrong with MMP. Deals done behind doors without voter input make a farce of the democratic process. This country is on the slow slippery slope to facism with shades of Zimbabwe or the USSR or North Korea where politicians arent elected fairly either. I hold all politicains in this country in absolute contempt the same way they treat me as a voter and taxpayer.

jhn   #8   03:17 pm Jul 22 2011

@RWR #6 -- the Green candidate doesn't have a chance of winning Ohariu. A strong national candidate probabyl could win Epsom..


Show 1-7 of 17 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Should bicycle helmets be mandatory?

Yes- They save lives and prevent injury

Yes- But only for children

No - It is a personal choice

I don’t care

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content