ETS rollout should slow down - review
JOHN HARTEVELT
Relevant offers
Politics
A Government-led review of the controversial Emissions Trading Scheme has called for a slow down of its implementation.
The report on a review in to the ETS, released this afternoon by Climate Change Minister Nick Smith, said energy, transport and industrial sectors should be phased in to the full scheme via three steps in 2013, 2014 and 2015.
Those three sectors were all due to come and pay for emissions from 2013. The review recommends that their obligations under the ETS be gradually introduced by 2015.
The changes recommended would ''raise some fiscal costs for the Government,'' which would in turn be carried by taxpayers.
''On the other side of the ledger, the panel recognises that ETS costs for businesses will rise a little faster than many of them had hoped and advocated,'' the review says.
The review panel has left unchanged, however, the controversial plan to introduce agriculture to the scheme from 2015.
Farmers and climate change critics have argued for a longer delay or for agriculture to be left out altogether.
But the review recommended ''no fundamental changes'' to the regime for agriculture, with changes instead suggested to stiffen up the phase-in period.
''This will provide greater clarity about the phase out of allocation, without significantly increasing short-term costs. The panel also recommends the Government explores a wider range of issues relating to allocation settings,'' the report says.
The review panel ''strongly'' believed ETS obligations for agriculture should be at the farmer level, rather than the processor level as currently legislated.
''This will ensure those who are best able to reduce their emissions are motivated to do so,'' the report said.
Further debate over agriculture's introduction to the scheme is likely when another review, being carried out by an Agricultural ETS Advisory Committee, is completed.
Overall, the review found there would be continued ''uncertainty'' about the future of international climate change agreements in the short to medium term.
It was unlikely that a successor to the Kyoto Protocol would be in place by the end of 2012, but New Zealand would continue to face ''strong international drivers'' to take responsibility for its emissions.
''The Panel considers that these drivers, including prospects for a new international agreement, can only increase over time.''
Some businesses felt a much stronger impact from the ETS than others and the review panel also found the scheme was ''particularly significant'' for lower income households, where Maori in particular were over-represented.
Smith said the report was consistent with the Government's climate change policy goal of New Zealand doing its fair share.
The proposals to phase in agriculture were ''well considered,'' he said.
''The Government does not support the introduction of agricultural emissions into the ETS before 2015. ... Agricultural emissions will only be included if practical technologies are available to enable farmers to reduce their emissions and more progress is made by our trading partners on measures to reduce emissions,'' Smith said.
The report and ''the bulk of the submissions'' to it supported most features of the ETS, he said.
Detailed work on the 61 recommendations was already under way.
''There are both upside and downside fiscal implications in different recommendations that will need to be considered. Changes to the scheme would require legislation and the Government will finalise its policy once the detailed work is complete.''
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Luckily Labour, who signed us up for ETS, want to bring ETS on agriculture forward.
Hopefully that should make people like Tony who want to vote to pay more tax happy (e.g. CGT etc).
Vote them out - its easy
Is this the same Tory MisGovernment whose water policy tends to favour the farming lobby. Is there a correlation between this and the tinkering with the ETS! It must be election year!
Hey Maxine #4, how is wood burning pollution got anything to do with CO2. Do you ahve even the most fundmental knowledge of science. CO2 is not only one of the most basic needs of life it is also one of the reasons we have life on Earth. No CO2 equals death to us all. CO2 at below 250 parts per million equals minimal plant growth and mass starvation. CO2 is not a pollutant it is our friend Al Gore is a liar.
ETS is the non-delivery of an invisible product to nobody.
So it's National helping their polluting mates. Nick Smith MP also delayed tighter standards against air pollution caused by wood burning. They really have zero green credentials now. The Nationals pretending to be green and calling themselves the Blue-Greens can now be seen for what they really are, complete liars with a callous hypocritical ploy to deceive people into voting for them. Let's not make that mistake come November.
As a sheep farmer I am already doing my fair share through ETS tax on power and fuel. Will sell all stock if this ETS tax is introduced on some animals as there is no way to prevent the sheep farting.
I assume that Tony is green? Can he explain how this country is going to continue to support its welfare payments, pay for the earthquakes, keep it's footing in the face of European economic meltdown , and repair some of the damage to the economy from the American catastrophe and not be interested in business? Many green supporters are young and move away to work, or on holiday. If you really believed all this you would not travel because of your carbon footprint, and it would be unethical for you to work in Australia and receive the benefits of the mining industry on the economy . Wouldn't it.
"government led" review says it all. National, on behalf of businesses, wants to put off ETS tax as long as possible for business.
Man admits threatening to kill and arson
Rubbish bins are better than bags
Protester costs council $350,000
'Quick fix' proposed for Ngaio School
Bus CEO: New routes slower, dearer
Carterton balloon was not airworthy
Council seeks massive cost cuts
Human safety priority over heritage
Car crashes into parking meter
Transmission Gully could make traffic worse
Human safety priority over heritage
Council seeks massive cost cuts
Carterton balloon was not airworthy
Victoria University students work to improve Firefox
Cold comfort for kitchen company's customers
Law Commission proposes courts shake-up
Transmission Gully could make traffic worse
Porirua closer to getting artificial sports field
Warning for gales in Wellington
Ecologist warns of Gully risk to fish
Vandals target Breaker Bay plaques
Newest First
Oldest First
Should bicycle helmets be mandatory?
The Green House Gas Effect is caused by-
Water vapour (humidity) 96 %
Natural pre-existing co2 (and some methane) 3%
Fossil fuel co2 1%
The greenhouse gas effect itself is under some discussion in scientific circles as these gases are good at scattering infrared heat but can they ever 'reflect' a significant amount ? Also natural and man made co2 makes up only 1/2000 th of the atmosphere, not much gas to reflect back a climate changing amount of heat