BREAKING NEWS
India win the first cricket test in Kanpur, beating the Black Caps by 197 runs ... Read more
Close

RMA changes proposed in report

VERNON SMALL
Last updated 16:06 05/07/2012

Relevant offers

Politics

John Key promotes Helen Clark. Andrew Little distances himself from her views. Say what? Ngapuhi break-away group would rather no settlement, than have the current board negotiate it John Key: Government keeping options open on hundreds jailed incorrectly National Party MP Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi compares international students to 'faulty fridges' Mortgage broker backs call for LVR exemptions for first home buyers The evolving classroom: Education's biggest revamp in 30 years Christchurch mum plans to rally against funding changes Under-pressure schools get dodgy with donations 19 Crown limos snapped over the speed limit Labour leader Andrew Little dismisses Helen Clark's advice about 'commanding the centre ground'

An independent report into the Resource Management Act has recommended changes that would bring the management of natural hazards and urban infrastructure into the list of things Councils should consider when granting resource consents.

The Technical Advisory Group (TAG) report also said none of those matters should be more important than another, and proposed changes to the structure of the RMA to make that clearer.

Environment Minister Amy Adams said the Government would consider the TAG report and the changes proposed to the principles in sections 6 and 7 of the RMA.

''After the Canterbury earthquakes, it became clear that consents for subdivisions had been granted without any consideration of the risk of liquefaction'' Adams said.

 ''The problem was that the RMA did not, and still does not, require these sorts of risks to be assessed and managed.

"Instead, the RMA prioritises preserving natural character, landscape, flora and fauna, public access, cultural values and heritage over managing natural hazards.''

She said a key consideration for the Government was to achieve ''enduring outcomes while reducing the time, costs and uncertainties involved in the process''.

But Green spokeswoman Eugenie Sage said the proposed changes were a major assault on the RMA and on sustainable management.

''If the Government was concerned about protecting our environment it would strengthen not further weaken the RMA,'' she said.

''The TAG recommendations are weighted towards facilitating development. This Government's agenda is to weaken the RMA to advance its dig it, drill it, mine it, irrigate it agenda for resource exploitation.''

She said a proposal to drop the requirement for councils and decision makers to provide for the ''preservation'' of natural character and the ''protection'' of outstanding landscapes and significant indigenous vegetation and habitats as matters of national importance ignored 20 years of Environment Court case law.

''Some of the changes around natural hazards may be sensible, however the minister is using natural hazard issues as a Trojan horse to weaken the Act's fundamentals around protecting the coast, outstanding landscapes and indigenous biodiversity.''

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content