Collins' defamation case against MPs hits courts

Last updated 10:14 18/07/2012
collins
JUDITH COLLINS: Taking defamation action against Andrew Little and Trevor Mallard.
Labour MP Trevor Mallard.
STIRRING COLLINS: Labour MP Trevor Mallard has been typically bullish.
Labour MP Andrew Little.
CAMERON BURNELL/Fairfax NZ
LAWYERED UP: Labour MP Andrew Little.

Relevant offers

Politics

Stacey Kirk: An expected steamroll - Mt Albert win gives Jacinda Ardern near unstoppable momentum School budgets have increased so why are so many principals struggling to make ends meet? Pike River mum: What we wanted was simple then, and it is simple now Jonathan Milne: Is it time to take the keys from Police Commissioner Mike Bush? Tracy Watkins: Andrew Little's morning after headache in Mt Albert Labour's Jacinda Ardern registers massive win in Mt Albert by-election Live: Jacinda Ardern will be MP for Mt Albert after by-election win ACT policy to reduce prisoner sentences a deft political move Westland District Council assets manager Vivek Goel under investigation ACT to reward prisoners with reduced sentences for learning to read in prison

ACC Minister Judith Collins has begun court action against Labour MPs Trevor Mallard and Andrew Little for defamation today, despite defence lawyers arguing to postpone it until a Privacy Commission report is complete.

Collins has accused the two MPs of defaming her in relation to a leaked email from former National Party president Michelle Boag.

Boag had emailed Collins about a case involving ACC claimant Bronwyn Pullar, who blew the whistle on ACC inadvertently releasing her details about thousands of ACC claimants.

Lawyers for Collins, Mallard and Little discussed the case's future before Justice Geoffrey Venning in the High Court at Auckland today.

John Tizard, acting for Little and Mallard, applied to the Court for a stay of proceedings until a Privacy Commission report into the leaked email is complete.

Justice Venning declined the application, but agreed to schedule the next court date for November - two months after the report is due to be completed.

The judge noted the report's findings would not necessarily affect the defamation proceedings, unless the parties agree to settle the case.

A trial date has been set for February next year, and it is expected to take between three and five days if it goes ahead.

At this stage both parties agree the trial should take place before a judge alone, but Justice Venning reserved leave for Tizard to request a jury trial at the settlement conference later this year if he wishes.

The defence and plaintiffs must provide each other with documents relating to the case by the end of August.

The next court date, scheduled for November 12, will be a settlement conference between the parties to attempt to resolve the proceedings before they go to trial.

Related stories 

ACC worker re-viewed leaked Smith letter

Ad Feedback

Key seeks pledges on ACC mystery

Full list of Bronwyn Pullar's complaints against ACC

ACC's massive privacy breach

John Judge calls on Pullar to prove claims

Nick Smith resigns cabinet

- The Dominion Post

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content