Ten-year-old Alex Fisher suffered head trauma, police have revealed ... Read more

Collins' defamation case against MPs hits courts

Last updated 10:14 18/07/2012
JUDITH COLLINS: Taking defamation action against Andrew Little and Trevor Mallard.
Labour MP Trevor Mallard.
STIRRING COLLINS: Labour MP Trevor Mallard has been typically bullish.
Labour MP Andrew Little.
LAWYERED UP: Labour MP Andrew Little.

Relevant offers


Malcolm Turnbull to make first official visit to New Zealand as Prime Minister TPPA: Generic medicine fears outweigh Government 'red herrings', Labour says Labour's Annette King denies internal rift over TPPA deal Organ donation review will look at cultural barriers Below the beltway: the week in politics CTU's Helen Kelly wants legal cannabis for cancer pain Battlelines drawn on Iraq trip Sky TV, internet users seek answers on criminal penalties for TV trickery 40 New Zealanders being held at Christmas Island immigration detention centre Controversial blue cod rules ditched

ACC Minister Judith Collins has begun court action against Labour MPs Trevor Mallard and Andrew Little for defamation today, despite defence lawyers arguing to postpone it until a Privacy Commission report is complete.

Collins has accused the two MPs of defaming her in relation to a leaked email from former National Party president Michelle Boag.

Boag had emailed Collins about a case involving ACC claimant Bronwyn Pullar, who blew the whistle on ACC inadvertently releasing her details about thousands of ACC claimants.

Lawyers for Collins, Mallard and Little discussed the case's future before Justice Geoffrey Venning in the High Court at Auckland today.

John Tizard, acting for Little and Mallard, applied to the Court for a stay of proceedings until a Privacy Commission report into the leaked email is complete.

Justice Venning declined the application, but agreed to schedule the next court date for November - two months after the report is due to be completed.

The judge noted the report's findings would not necessarily affect the defamation proceedings, unless the parties agree to settle the case.

A trial date has been set for February next year, and it is expected to take between three and five days if it goes ahead.

At this stage both parties agree the trial should take place before a judge alone, but Justice Venning reserved leave for Tizard to request a jury trial at the settlement conference later this year if he wishes.

The defence and plaintiffs must provide each other with documents relating to the case by the end of August.

The next court date, scheduled for November 12, will be a settlement conference between the parties to attempt to resolve the proceedings before they go to trial.

Related stories 

ACC worker re-viewed leaked Smith letter

Ad Feedback

Key seeks pledges on ACC mystery

Full list of Bronwyn Pullar's complaints against ACC

ACC's massive privacy breach

John Judge calls on Pullar to prove claims

Nick Smith resigns cabinet

- The Dominion Post


Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content