Tobacco boss: 'Smokefree' will drive sales underground

Last updated 05:00 23/08/2012

Relevant offers

Politics

It's time for some myth-busting about safety laws - and our place in the world Ministers seek power to bypass Housing NZ for state house sales Labour says charter school has nearly $2.5 million unaccounted for Controversial social bonds pilot could take seven years to deliver results Winston Peters says questions over NZ First's deputy will soon be answered Kiwis okay with social media monitoring for counter-terrorism, but not business Doctors' uptake on free GP visits scheme for children 'exceeds expectations' Sonny Tau continues to lead Ngapuhi Editorial: Free doctor visits for children worth it in long run Beehive Live: Just the ticket

The boss of New Zealand's biggest tobacco company believes the Government's vision to make the country smokefree by 2025 will force cigarette sales underground.

Steve Rush, general manager of British American Tobacco New Zealand, yesterday launched a campaign to fight a Government proposal to force tobacco to be sold in plain packages. Its Agree-Disagree campaign will see the company spend “hundreds of thousands” in advertising nationwide.

The company wants the proposal dumped and would also lobby MPs and Cabinet ministers.

The smokefree plan is a key policy of National's support partner the Maori Party and is being pushed by co-leader Tariana Turia, who is also the associate health minister.

Mrs Turia has published a consultation document suggesting New Zealand copy Australia's move towards plain packaging of cigarettes.

BAT will put forward its submission against the move by the October deadline.

The High Court in Australia last week ruled that plain packaging did not contravene the Australian constitution. Plain packaging comes into force there in October.

In a rare interview, Mr Rush said plain packaging would not work, citing the graphic health warnings in 2008, which failed to cut smoking. It is his first major public campaign after 17 years with BAT.

“We thought this was such a big issue that we needed to [make] it very clear: yes, tobacco's harmful, but not all tobacco regulation is good regulation,” he said. “If you try and reduce smoking incidence by penalising legal operators then you will just force it underground.”

Such a move would not reduce consumption, but increase it as the product became more affordable: with companies unable to brand their products, they could be forced to compete on price.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content