ACC move on blackmail allegations 'inadequate'

PHIL KITCHIN
Last updated 05:00 30/08/2012

Relevant offers

Politics

Auditor-General had doubts Saudi sheep deal was legal More aid for Cook Islands - John Key Anne Tolley's 'lab rats' call inflammatory political rhetoric MPs reject plea by Carterton balloon victim's family for new rules on bodies Wine Bill amendment to clarify origins Reports of NZ First’s death are (still) exaggerated No evidence of legal advice Government faced $30m lawsuit over Saudi sheep deal TPP deal failed because it was about protectionism, not trade Volunteer injured at speedway is furious no-one can be held accountable Maori Council ditches Donna Hall's law firm over TPP claim

ACC has made small steps to correct false allegations of blackmail against privacy whistleblower Bronwyn Pullar.

It posted an online "addendum" yesterday to a report by two senior managers about their meeting with Ms Pullar and her supporter, Michelle Boag, in December. Their allegations that Ms Pullar demanded a guaranteed benefit for two years and threatened to withhold information if demands were not met were shown to be false.

Nonetheless, the report containing the allegations has remained on ACC's website.

Yesterday's addendum said the managers had a “perception a threat had been made” and referred the matter to police to decide if wrong-doing had taken place. “The police released their finding that ‘no offence has been disclosed' - documents relating to that decision are also available on this website.”

Ms Pullar and Ms Boag said the response was “inadequate”.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content