McCully targets UN veto powers

JOHN HARTEVELT
Last updated 07:41 01/10/2012
un xs
CRAIG SIMCOX/Fairfax NZ
PLEASE, MAAM: Murray McCully wants the veto powers of the UN lessened. The five permanent members of the United Nations are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the Unite States.

Relevant offers

Politics

Public input called for on plans to extend Kaikoura shellfish ban Nelson by-election could be parting gift from councillors bound for Beehive Rachel Boyack selected as Labour Party candidate for Nelson Freight ships not on the horizon but Kaikoura tourism staying afloat Number of cycle helmet fines drops from 11,000 to 5500 in two years Labour leader Andrew Little makes Pike River re-entry bill an election promise Beggars reveal what life is like on the street Fair trade pants hard to come by for Oxfam trailwalkers Good times on the water, political storm to come MPs' hidden talents: Statistics Minister Mark Mitchell has a handle on police dogs

Foreign Affairs Minister Murray McCully has called on the big boys of the United Nations to give up some of their veto rights.

In his speech to the General Assembly in New York yesterday, Mr McCully challenged the five permanent members of the Security Council (P5) to trim the grounds on which they could veto a council resolution.

When the UN was established in 1945, the P5 had asked for the power of veto over Security Council resolutions to protect their vital national interests, he said.

"Yet today, we routinely see the exercise of the veto in circumstances which have little to do with national interests," Mr McCully said.

"My request to the five permanent members is simply that they stick with what they said in 1945."

Citing paralysis over a UN response to civil war in Syria, Mr McCully said the Security Council was "at risk of losing its credibility".

"From all of this, the case for reform of the Security Council has become utterly compelling. Indeed, increasingly, the future credibility of the United Nations may depend upon it."

The P5 should agree to voluntarily confine its use of the veto to issues that clearly and directly affected their vital national interests and not to use their veto in situations involving mass atrocities.

New Zealand is bidding for a seat on the Security Council. Mr McCully told the General Assembly New Zealand was an "energetic candidate".

Ad Feedback

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content