Chris Cairns found not guilty in perjury case ... Read more

Govt criticised for axeing environment reports

Last updated 09:47 30/10/2012

Relevant offers


Possible Victoria Cross for firefight which killed two Kiwi soldiers Labour leader Andrew Little dumps Nanaia Mahuta, David Cunliffe in reshuffle Governor-General Sir Jerry Mateparae undergoes heart surgery Trans-Tasman roll call - the best and worst of the 2015 political year High flying costs New Zealand tax payers Moroney rewarded for ACC, parental leave work South Canterbury MPs slide down Trans Tasman rankings Andrew Little's canny reshuffle rewards effort, softens blow for losers Andrew Little to unveil Labour's shadow Cabinet Prime Minister John Key defends 'green' credentials ahead of major summit

The Government's decision to scrap five-yearly "state of the environment" reports is an attempt to hide its "pro-irrigation, anti- climate, and pro-mining policies", the Greens say.

Environment spokeswoman Eugenie Sage also said stopping the report kept "New Zealanders in the dark about what is happening to the environment and what the problems are".

Responding to a parliamentary question from the Greens, Environment Minister Amy Adams confirmed yesterday the Environment Ministry-authored report, due in December, would not be produced.

Instead, the ministry was releasing simple report cards on what Ms Sage called "a patchy, ad hoc and occasional basis".

Labour environment spokesman Grant Robertson said the decision was "a major step backwards for the health of New Zealand's environment". New Zealand is the only OECD country that does not have legislation requiring national reporting on the state of the environment.

Ms Adams defended the decision, saying regular report cards raised the standard of reporting. The ministry tracked performance through the National Environment Report. It gives report cards on 22 core environmental initiatives.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content