Former MP compares gay marriage to apartheid

BEN HEATHER
Last updated 13:09 14/11/2012
Gordon Copeland
SIMON EDWARDS/Fairfax NZ
Former United Future MP Gordon Copeland says allowing gay people to marry is like apartheid South Africa calling the Maori rugby team "honorary whites".

Relevant offers

Politics

Maori Party will win seat, poll suggests Beyer takes Harawira to task over Dotcom Key's staff to be grilled over Goff claim Who's investigating who? Apathy? No, there's just no one to vote for Campaign Diary: Monday, 1 Sept Bloggers targeted business journalist Collins, SIS claims to be investigated by panels SFO's Adam Feeley confident truth will come out Labour invests in Christchurch transport

Former United Future MP Gordon Copeland has compared gay marriage to apartheid, saying allowing gay people to marry was like calling the New Zealand Maori rugby team "honorary whites".

The comments were made before a select committee hearing submissions on the Marriage (Definition of Marriage Bill) Amendment Act, which would allow same-sex marriage. They sparked condemnation from MPs.

Copeland told the committee he opposed the bill, which would "debase" marriage by broadening its definition to include same-sex couples.

Same-sex couples had the same legal rights under a civil union and calling a same-sex relationship "marriage" was comparable to calling the Maori rugby team "honorary whites" for apartheid tour of South Africa, which was insulting to Maori.

"These two relationships are different relationships and putting them together is debasing marriage," he said.

But Labour MP Charles Chauvel said Mr Copeland's talk about "different but equal" seemed to echo the apartheid race rhetoric in much more offensive way.

"As gay and lesbians, think about how that analogy makes us feel," he said.

Mr Copeland said his comments were not a race analogy, but about government's using the same term for two different things. Committee chair Labour MP Ruth Dyson called them offensive and inappropriate.

"You need to think about how you made people feel with those comments."

Outside the committee, Copeland defended his comments and denied they were homophobic.

"That is just stupid."

Other submitters also argued against the bill, with many church leaders afraid it would compel them to marry homosexual couples. Some suggested the next step could be legalising incest or bigamy.

MPs have stressed that no-one would by compelled to marry someone against their religious belief.

Supporters of the bill have called the current law a violation of human rights.

Contact Ben Heather
Social Issues reporter
Email: ben.heather@dompost.co.nz
Twitter: @BHeatherJourno

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content