Collins' defamation case settled

Last updated 16:40 14/11/2012

Relevant offers


Trans-Tasman roll call - the best and worst of the 2015 political year Faces of Innocents: Too many children are dying, are we about to break another promise? Prime Minister John Key defends 'green' credentials ahead of major summit Andrew Little to unveil Labour's shadow Cabinet New Zealand and Australia condemn Japan for resuming Southern Ocean whaling Jenny Shipley: Why we need a silver fern flag Children's flag referendum views are being heard by voters in their families 'Our job is not to censor. We're not serving the political elite, business or corporations' Stacey Kirk: Strewth! Join Australia? They're a bunch of flaming galahs! 'I don't want to be prime minister' – Jacinda Ardern

After a day of legal wrangling, ACC minister Judith Collins has settled her defamation case with two Labour MPs, who say they regret their words.

The minister and Labour MPs Trevor Mallard and Andrew Little, armed with lawyers, attended a settlement hearing in the High Court at Auckland for action launched by Collins in May.

She claims the two Opposition MPs defamed her over comments she says linked her to the leaking of an email from former National Party president Michelle Boag over a massive ACC privacy breach.

After nearly six hours in closed court, the politicians emerged and handed media a written statement, refusing to comment further.

They agreed the leaked email raised "an issue of serious public concern" and Little and Mallard were entitled to question who was responsible.

However, it appears there was a concession their questioning went too far.

"The parties continue to differ over whether the remarks made by Messrs Mallard and Little respectively on Radio New Zealand implied the minister falsely assured the House that neither she nor her office was responsible for the leak," the statement said.

"Messrs Mallard and Little have confirmed to Ms Collins that was not their intention and wish to make that clear publicly and in the event such meaning was taken, they regret it."

Mallard and Little initially laughed off the action, labelling it "vexatious, politically motivated and lacking principle" and had previously said they would not apologise if they did not believe they had defamed her.

Outside court this morning Collins emphasised she was only looking for the Labour MPs to say sorry and was keen to avoid the matter going to trial.

"I've always made it very plain that I've been defamed so that needs to be acknowledged," she said.

"I've asked for an apology . . . I haven't asked for any money."

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content