Maori water rights case begins

VERNON SMALL
Last updated 12:31 26/11/2012
Mighty River Power
SUPPLIED

NZ ASSET: Mighty River Power's Tauhara geothermal plant.

Relevant offers

Politics

Does Brexit wreck it for New Zealand? National MP and former cop Mark Mitchell confesses to accidentally leaving police dog behind Powerful NZ dame: UK ties to become deeper, stronger and more significant Jonathan Milne: Sorry Boris, you can't come crawling back to the Commonwealth, the days of Empire are gone Winston Peters hails 'stunning 24 hours in world politics' Marama Fox isn't the first MP to tell tobacco companies to 'butt out' of New Zealand's affairs John Key says Brexit vote will have no significant impact on New Zealand MP Marama Fox calls Imperial Tobacco spokesman a 'peddler of death' on The Nation Brexit: Manawatu-based UK expats divided over results Brexit: NZ politicians weigh in on referendum

Maori groups trying to block the sale of state assets until their water rights issues are resolved have opened their submissions at the High Court in Wellington.

Helen Cull QC acting for the Pouakani Claims Trust indicated her submission would take most of the day before the Maori Council began its submission.

Cull argued that before the assets are transferred from being a state-owned enterprise to the mixed ownership model assets should be "tagged or marked" or some other mechanism used to preserve Maori interests in water.

Justice Ronald Young said he did not understand why the Government needed to act now before  the transfer because water rights were determined under the Resource Management Act which the Government could change anytime.

Justice Young said there were ways of providing commercial redress.

However the claimants, which include the Waikato River Dam Trust which Cull also represents, may have a stronger point over cultural issues such as access that are not necessarily commercial.

But he said the Waitangi Tribunal did not argue that in its findings on stage one of its inquiry.

Cull said the tribunal had parked those issues for stage two of its inquiry. 

Justice Young said the Crown's "king hit" submission was that ministers were carrying out Parliament's intent by transferring the state assets to the mixed ownership model.

 

That would mean the decision to transfer the assets out of the State-Owned Enterprises Act, implemented by an order in council, was not reviewable by the court.

But Cull said Orders-in-Council could be reviewable as was the original law that enabled the transfer.

 

The case is set down for four days but is expected to wrap up on Wednesday or early Thursday.

The Government has put on hold the sale of 49 per cent of Mighty River Power until the judicial review is resolved.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content