Bain seeks judicial review

Last updated 15:53 30/01/2013

Relevant offers

Politics

High turnover of staff in National MP's office and claims of bullying Crown Law solicitors paid more to prosecute dog owners than murderers Stacey Kirk: Moko's killers deserve life in jail - they've already gotten away with murder Does Brexit wreck it for New Zealand? Trade Minister to meet with EU and UK to discuss impact of Brexit on Kiwi exporters Jonathan Milne: Sorry Boris, you can't come crawling back to the Commonwealth, the days of Empire are gone Moko: Hit, kicked, thrown, bitten, stomped and smothered – but prosecutors can't prove couple murdered the boy NZ cigarette plain packaging law would see Imperial Tobacco sue for compensation Guy Williams: How to take down the National Party Powerful NZ dame: UK ties to become deeper, stronger and more significant

David Bain has filed a claim in the Auckland High Court seeking a judicial review of Justice Minister Judith Collins' handling of his compensation case.

A statement issued by Bain supporter Joe Karam said he was seeking a judicial review of the actions taken by Collins since she received Justice Binnie's  report in late August 2012, including the "secret process" which culminated in the subsequent report by Judge Robert Fisher.

"The claim includes allegations that the Minister has breached David's rights to natural justice, breached his rights under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, acted in bad faith, abused her power, and acted in a biased, unreasonable and predetermined manner," Mr Karam said.

"Declarations are sought from the Court to this effect, along with any necessary further directions."

The claim also requested the Crown defer any further action in relation to Bain's claim pending the outcome of the judicial review.

"David Bain has particularly requested that I make it known that he anguished over the prospect of returning to Court, and only did so  with great reluctance," spokesman Joe Karam said.

"The application is necessary  because the Minister has continued her policy of refusing to constructively communicate with his advisers, and because he no longer has any confidence that his claim is being assessed in a fair manner. "

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content