Major changes urged for Fire Service

BEN HEATHER
Last updated 10:46 07/02/2013

Relevant offers

Politics

Judith Collins: Cunliffe is a moron Campaign Diary: Wednesday, Sept 3 Unions back Green wage policy Key v Cunliffe: Your verdict Housing divides candidates More voters eye Greens as viable option Press leaders debate 2014 In the beginning, people created govt for the people Greens running a cool campaign Judith Collins inquiry a long process

The Fire Service needs a nationwide shake-up, with new powers to collect funding and extra obligations to attend crashes, a review has found.

An independent review panel of the Fire Service found it had no legal obligation to attend crashes despite becoming New Zealand's default rescue agency.

Because of their informal role as rescue respondents, firefighters also had no legal protection if a response went wrong.

''It was of concern to the Panel that New Zealand communities expect the fire services to deliver these services, and indeed rely on them to do so, but that the fire services are neither obligated to deliver them nor is their liability limited if things go wrong.''

Law changes were recommended to spell out the Fire Service's obligation to respond to accidents and limit firefighters' liability.

The panel also recommended new ways for the Fire Service to recover costs of attending fires and rescues.

This would include changing the way the Fire Service charges commercial property owners levies.

A disagreement between the insurance brokers and the Fire Service over levies on commercial property currently being litigated through the courts.

Internal Affairs Minister Chris Tremain described the report as evolutionary rather than revolutionary.

''Their (Fire Service) roles have expanded to provide a multi-purpose emergency and rescue service so it's important to get the legislation right.''

The Government would consider the recommendations with further decisions expected in March.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content