ACC head's $100k payout defended

VERNON SMALL
Last updated 13:29 15/02/2013
Ralph Stewart
Ralph Stewart

Relevant offers

Politics

Sam Sachdeva: Greens take the lead as parties prepare candidates for 2017 election David Slack: No need to go overboard Selling scratchies online would increase gambling harm - Ministry of Health What did Donald say to Melania during that Waltz? GCSB Intercepts heard every word Ready or not, it's election year and the annual theatrics have started Angela Roberts looks back on ups, downs and almosts of four years at helm of PPTA Is politics the next move for outgoing PPTA president Angela Roberts? GP and poet Glenn Colquhoun: 'Every week I hear at least one story I thought was not possible.' Public input called for on plans to extend Kaikoura shellfish ban Paul Eagle confirms he will put his name forward for national politics

ACC chairperson Paula Rebstock is rejecting suggestions of a "scapegoat" bonus being paid to former chief executive Ralph Stewart.

Stewart was given a performance bonus of $100,493 when he left the corporation in what Labour spokesman Andrew Little says was "sympathy money" paid out by the board.

The corporation has confirmed Stewart also received $22,765.05 in lieu of accrued leave and $23,158.98 for his statutory leave entitlement.

The $100,493.00 was his "normal 'at risk' component" for 2012 taking his total final pay out to $146,417.03.

"Mr Stewart received 90 per cent of the at-risk component of his remuneration agreement for the first half of 2012, and 100 per cent of his at-risk component for the second half of the year," Rebstock said.

The second half year component included recognition that Stewart remained in his role beyond his resignation, pending the appointment of an acting chief executive in December, she said.

Little said the bonus was paid by the board because Stewart had quit so early in his tenure but could not be held responsible for the systems that allowed the huge privacy breach to whistleblower Bronwyn Pullar.

"But he got caught up in the (ACC Minister) Judith Collins maelstrom of getting rid of people," Little said.

"It should never have happened. If you talk to staff he was the one person they had confidence in ... to turn the culture around and get the thing fixed."

Fallout from the March 2012 privacy breach saw the resignations of former ACC minister Nick Smith and the departure of board chairman John Judge and directors John McCliskie and Rob Campbell.

Stewart resigned but stayed on until the end of 2012.

But Little said there was no way he could have been assessed on his performance to get 100 per cent of his "at risk" component, which he had received.

"It comes down to one simple thing," Little said.

"He should never have gone and the board paid the money out in some sort of element of sympathy."

Stewart declined to comment.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content