ACC calls in SFO over Wellington building lease

ALEX FENSOME
Last updated 05:00 16/02/2013

Relevant offers

Politics

Labour seeks closer relationship with NZ First Beehive Live: Tuesday March 31 NZ troops sent to Australia for Isis training 1080 threat: Labour slams police investigation speed Tax changes to affect 'everyone' Latvia seeks NZ's advice on UN Security Council bid 'Long process' to seek compensation for Teina Pora Animal testing of cosmetics ban proposed Carmel Sepuloni's mother sentenced for benefit fraud New laws to help first-home buyers and parents

ACC has launched an investigation and asked the Serious Fraud Office to examine claims of corruption over the lease of its central Wellington offices.

The lease of the Taranaki St building was negotiated by former ACC national property manager Malcolm Mason, sacked in 2010 after taking a bribe in return for confidential information.

ACC confirmed this week it had started investigating after receiving a letter alleging the Taranaki St deal was "dodgy". Mr Mason declined to comment.

An ACC spokesman said the corporation had contacted the SFO to find out whether the allegations had links to previous investigations of Mr Mason.

The SFO said it had received the information and was assessing it.

The Taranaki St building was vacated in May last year after engineers found it was an earthquake risk.

ACC has not been able to negotiate a buyout of the lease, which has three years to run, and is paying $450,000 a year in rent.

In 2011, Mr Mason admitted taking a $160,000 bribe from businessman Gregory Hutt for the name of a building ACC planned to lease in Whangarei.

Mr Hutt bought the building and later sold it at a profit thanks to the security of ACC's long-term lease.

Mr Mason pleaded guilty to corruption and bribery charges and was sentenced to 11 months' home detention in March 2011.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content