Partners of fraudulent beneficiaries targeted

Last updated 12:43 20/02/2013

Relevant offers

Politics

John Key: Calls to move Govt's Waitangi welcome off Te Tii Marae 'fair' TPPA: Labour will not pull out of trade deal if Govt - Andrew Little Gerry Brownlee heads to anti-Islamic State coalition meeting in Belgium Govt unlikely to impose reciprocal health surcharge on UK visitors Student debt political trickery of the highest order Prime Minister John Key outlines the Government's priorities for the year Finance Minister Bill English sees no reason to change Reserve Bank agreement NZ considering aid boost to help Tonga contain Zika virus Labour leader weighs in on dildo-gate and Steven Joyce Motueka man travels New Zealand on 21-month-long TPPA protest

Spouses or partners of fraudster beneficiaries will be snared under new legislation designed to crack down on welfare fraud.

Announcing the measure today, Associate Social Development Minister Chester Borrows said there would be a new offence created targeting partners or spouses of beneficiaries who are convicted of fraud.

It meant both parties would be charged, not just the person wrongly collecting the benefit.

"Relationship offending last year cost over $20 million and makes up one third of welfare fraud prosecutions," Borrows said.

"Currently there are few options available to prosecute partners who know or benefit from such offending, leaving the entire debt with one partner."

The new offence of relationship fraud would hold people to account for any debt incurred by their partners while fraudulently claiming a benefit.

Partners could face a fine of up to $5000 or 12 months in jail and MSD would be able to seize assets owned or jointly owned by a spouse or partner under the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act to help pay off the debt.

About 700 cases a year were expected.

The Government was also introducing new measures to verify information provided by beneficiaries who had previously been dishonest with the Ministry of social Development.

The new measures would include limiting their access to self-service transactions.

A third initiative would see data sharing between ACC, Inland Revenue, Housing New Zealand, the New Zealand Police and the Ministry of Social Development.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content