Partners of fraudulent beneficiaries targeted

Last updated 12:43 20/02/2013

Relevant offers

Politics

Why watching Clark and Key is like landing in a parallel universe Tough new dog control laws 'condemning innocent dogs to die', SPCA says Govt puts off reforms to local government law to 2017 NZ renters are shut out of the housing market - Labour Ngapuhi imploding as iwi meet to vote on the future of their treaty settlement Stacey Kirk: Donor changes will save lives, but for those who died waiting on a transplant When and where: Planning to remember the NZ Wars OSCAR KIGHTLEY: Syria ceasefire more of a drinks break Jonathan Milne: Winston Peters should be docked the cost of aborted Treaty settlements from his own salary Editorial: Police top brass besieged by high turnover, payroll blowout and community station closures

Spouses or partners of fraudster beneficiaries will be snared under new legislation designed to crack down on welfare fraud.

Announcing the measure today, Associate Social Development Minister Chester Borrows said there would be a new offence created targeting partners or spouses of beneficiaries who are convicted of fraud.

It meant both parties would be charged, not just the person wrongly collecting the benefit.

"Relationship offending last year cost over $20 million and makes up one third of welfare fraud prosecutions," Borrows said.

"Currently there are few options available to prosecute partners who know or benefit from such offending, leaving the entire debt with one partner."

The new offence of relationship fraud would hold people to account for any debt incurred by their partners while fraudulently claiming a benefit.

Partners could face a fine of up to $5000 or 12 months in jail and MSD would be able to seize assets owned or jointly owned by a spouse or partner under the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act to help pay off the debt.

About 700 cases a year were expected.

The Government was also introducing new measures to verify information provided by beneficiaries who had previously been dishonest with the Ministry of social Development.

The new measures would include limiting their access to self-service transactions.

A third initiative would see data sharing between ACC, Inland Revenue, Housing New Zealand, the New Zealand Police and the Ministry of Social Development.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content