Calls widen for GCSB law probe

Last updated 11:44 17/07/2013

Relevant offers

Politics

Labour jumps to 30pc in Roy Morgan survey Taxpayers pay minister's $300 tab Attorney-General meets FBI boss Parliament outlaws slave-like fishing conditions Parliament bill addresses 'No 1 threat' to sport Labour would fund veterans' funerals Ex-Green claims colincraig.co.nz spoof site Beehive Live: July 31, 2014 Tiki Taane urges young people to vote ACT shows off new candidate

The Privacy Commission has joined calls for further investigation into proposed new spying powers.

Commissioner Marie Shroff says the Law Commission should be asked to examine legislation and oversight of intelligence agencies.

The Government is proposing the Government Communications Security Bureau Amendment Bill to make it legal for the agency to spy on New Zealanders on behalf of other law enforcement bodies.

It says it is necessary to clarify the law after the GCSB was found to be illegally intercepting communications.

But the bill has met opposition, including from the Law Society and the Human Rights Commission.

Now the Privacy Commission has joined the chorus, saying the GCSB's powers must be "demonstrably necessary and justified".

It says the bill is not specific enough about what the oversight mechanism is for GCSB's activities on behalf of other agencies.

There are also questions over the protection of privacy.

The commission says the bill should be delayed until these issues have been examined.

"It is worth investing in some additional consideration to ensure that we have the soundest model possible," the commission says in a submission to Parliament.

However, the report notes that updating the law is necessary "in our complex digital world, so that GCSB can keep pace with new threats to New Zealand, both in the traditional intelligence sphere and in the area of cybersecurity".

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content