Poverty defence flawed, claims Labour

Last updated 05:00 28/02/2014

Relevant offers

Politics

Saudis threatened to sue Government for $20-$30m National MPs' concerns prompt delay to health and safety law Govt greenlights SkyCity Convention Centre Four new replacements as Relationships Aotearoa ditched Govt names new providers to replace Relationships Aotearoa Call to withdraw New Zealand troops from Iraq New Teachers' Council not representative of teachers - Labour Parliament workload 'lightest for 20 years' Beehive Live: Maurice Williamson trouble-making? Rangitikei MP Ian McKelvie apologises over human trafficking, sheep rustling comparison

Finance Minister Bill English continued to quote a report on inequality despite knowing it was flawed, Labour says.

Yesterday the Ministry of Social Development said it estimated that 285,000 Kiwi children were living in poverty, which was 20,000 more than previously thought. It also said income inequality was slightly larger than thought. It came after Treasury and Statistics New Zealand confessed that calculations about household disposable income dating back to 2007 contained a major flaw, with an accommodation supplement counted twice. Treasury insisted that there were no "real world" implications.

In January, as Mr English dismissed Labour claims that there was a growing gap between rich and poor, the finance minister continued to quote the MSD report to claim there was no evidence this was the case.

Yesterday Mr English confirmed that he was told of the error before Christmas, but that the real picture was "roughly the same", a spokeswoman said.

Labour said Mr English's statements were misleading.

"If he is trying to say that [inequality] figures aren't getting worse . . . well, that's just misleading," Labour's finance spokesman David Parker said.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content