Poverty defence flawed, claims Labour

Last updated 05:00 28/02/2014

Relevant offers

Politics

Andrew Little: I care about New Zealand too, Mr Joyce A TPP protester's open letter to Steven Joyce Police Minister still supports police pursuits after three injured in crash Negotiator refuses to say if NZ sought right to ban foreign house buyers under TPP Tuna treaty negotiations signal grave consequences for Pacific Sparks fly over proposed Marlborough Sounds recreational fishing park John Key turns down Winston Peters' challenge to find a photo of him fishing in Northland Former Conservative leader Colin Craig wants to build affordable homes AgResearch axed climate change researchers in restructure NZ First leader Winston Peters blocked from bus ride 'due to health and safety'

Finance Minister Bill English continued to quote a report on inequality despite knowing it was flawed, Labour says.

Yesterday the Ministry of Social Development said it estimated that 285,000 Kiwi children were living in poverty, which was 20,000 more than previously thought. It also said income inequality was slightly larger than thought. It came after Treasury and Statistics New Zealand confessed that calculations about household disposable income dating back to 2007 contained a major flaw, with an accommodation supplement counted twice. Treasury insisted that there were no "real world" implications.

In January, as Mr English dismissed Labour claims that there was a growing gap between rich and poor, the finance minister continued to quote the MSD report to claim there was no evidence this was the case.

Yesterday Mr English confirmed that he was told of the error before Christmas, but that the real picture was "roughly the same", a spokeswoman said.

Labour said Mr English's statements were misleading.

"If he is trying to say that [inequality] figures aren't getting worse . . . well, that's just misleading," Labour's finance spokesman David Parker said.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content