Poverty defence flawed, claims Labour

Last updated 05:00 28/02/2014

Relevant offers

Politics

John Key to implement 'most' Shewan report recommendations on foreign trusts PM: National MP Paul Foster-Bell's high travel costs because of his 'expertise' Moko's killers got manslaughter to eliminate 'substantial risk' of either walking free Ombudsman Ron Paterson cuts short five-year term as office deals with investigations backlog Forest & Bird to join Kermadec court case against Treaty fishing claims Road toll breaks for electric vehicles 'interesting question' Maori councillor announces next political move at annual Maui Pomare festivities New Zealand's refugee quota is 'embarrassingly small' High turnover of staff in National MP's office and claims of bullying Crown Law solicitors paid more to prosecute dog owners than murderers

Finance Minister Bill English continued to quote a report on inequality despite knowing it was flawed, Labour says.

Yesterday the Ministry of Social Development said it estimated that 285,000 Kiwi children were living in poverty, which was 20,000 more than previously thought. It also said income inequality was slightly larger than thought. It came after Treasury and Statistics New Zealand confessed that calculations about household disposable income dating back to 2007 contained a major flaw, with an accommodation supplement counted twice. Treasury insisted that there were no "real world" implications.

In January, as Mr English dismissed Labour claims that there was a growing gap between rich and poor, the finance minister continued to quote the MSD report to claim there was no evidence this was the case.

Yesterday Mr English confirmed that he was told of the error before Christmas, but that the real picture was "roughly the same", a spokeswoman said.

Labour said Mr English's statements were misleading.

"If he is trying to say that [inequality] figures aren't getting worse . . . well, that's just misleading," Labour's finance spokesman David Parker said.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content