Safety inspectors payout cost $1.1m

HAMISH RUTHERFORD
Last updated 05:00 04/03/2014

Relevant offers

Politics

Grant Robertson, Bill English square off in housing debate The 'Mad Men' budget 'Fat people' to blame for tobacco tax: Winston Peters Schools will decide how to spend targeted funding for under-achieving kids Key gets tough on Auckland with new policy forcing councils to release land TPPA, housing and child poverty protesters greet John Key on Palmerston North visit Govt thinks about compulsory warranty to protect against building flaws Jeremy Elwood & Michele A'Court: Paying the rent DHBs still being shortchanged, says Labour - unveils health map to highlight regional shortfalls Below the beltway: The week in politics

More than $1.1 million was spent making health and safety inspectors redundant last year, leaving fewer inspectors than at the time of the Pike River disaster.

Despite vowing to increase the number of inspectors, the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment offered experienced staff the option of taking redundancy if they did not want to sit a new test. Those who did not meet the standards required by the test were also offered redundancy, or to be able to sit it test again in 12 months.

Figures released under the Official Information Act show 17 health and safety inspectors took redundancy under the programme during 2013, with an average payout of $67,000.

The redundancies came as the number of health and safety inspectors dropped from 146 at the end of 2012 to 129 at the end of 2013.

Worksafe, the Crown agency established to oversee reform of workplace health and safety, said it was on track to increase the number of inspectors to 200 by the end of 2016.

Worksafe human resources manager Janine Hearn said the Pike River Royal Commission and Independent Taskforce on Workplace Health and Safety showed the regulator had to "improve the quality of its work".

The strategy to improve was "about lifting capability first, and numbers second", Hearn said, with the implementation of technical tests for all staff.

However, critics claim the changes have stripped vast institutional knowledge from the workforce. A former inspector who took redundancy said the trainees would be "of no practical value" for at least two years as they learnt about the industries.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content