Will Key forgive this breathtaking disaster?

TRACY WATKINS
Last updated 05:00 20/03/2014

Relevant offers

Politics

Bush should have come clean earlier Royal Air Force giant touches down in capital to spearhead European sales pitch Council assets manager Vivek Goel under investigation Green Party break into rash over Government's clean water targets Security and spying legislation changes boost accountability for warrants against New Zealanders Andrew Little joins Jacinda Ardern on her final day of campaigning Councils should keep pensioner housing, says Labour deputy leader Annette King The new 'swimmable' fresh water target: Nick Smith defends his plan Could Jacinda Ardern's star rise further on a Mt Albert by-election win? New 'swimmable' fresh water targets are also 100% pure politics

How long before Prime Minister John Key decides Hekia Parata is a liability in Cabinet?

OPINION: The only saving grace in the kohanga reo debacle has been Key's calculated decision to leave chief of staff Wayne Eagleson behind while he is on a 10-day trip to China and Europe.

The decision to refer allegations of misspending by a kohanga reo-related company to the Serious Fraud Office - less than 12 hours after Parata assured the "taxpayers of New Zealand" that there had been no impropriety - looked like something that had Eagleson's fingerprints on it.

Her handling of the affair has been a breathtaking disaster.

During a press conference on Tuesday night Parata blustered and bullied her way through questions about her assurance that none of the $92 million in public funding allocated to the Kohanga Reo National Trust, or paid to its subsidiary, Te Pataka Ohanga, had been misspent.

After giving reporters 10 minutes to read the report by accountants Ernst & Young, Parata announced: "I am satisfied that public moneys are being expended in the appropriate way."

When it was eventually pointed out to her that none of the spending relating to wedding dresses or Trelise Cooper outfits had been addressed by the report, she triumphantly told reporters that these matters were never included in the terms of reference.

She insisted, meanwhile, that there were no instances of the subsidiary receiving public money.

It took a Kohanga Reo National Trust board member to eventually confirm that kohanga reo got money from the Ministry of Education and the subsidiary got its money from kohanga reo.

Parata's logic appears to suggest that any agency can use a standalone company to avoid accountability for taxpayer funds.

That a board member blew the whistle on so-far-unsubstantiated allegations so soon afterwards suggests it was not just Parata's colleagues who were left alarmed about where things were headed.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content