Supreme Court rules against Kim Dotcom

STACEY KIRK
Last updated 09:30 21/03/2014
Kim Dotcom
KIM DOTCOM: Facing extradition to the US.

Relevant offers

Politics

Jo Moir: Schools will look to parents' pockets after a freeze on school operational funding Stacey Kirk: Remission but no cure, with a healthy Budget boost for ailing an health system Few surprises in English's eighth Budget as surpluses prime election war chest Budget 2016: Bill English Budget criticised as 'sticking plaster on compound fracture' Tax cuts more viable after 'safe, secure' budget? Budget 2016: Who's going to pay for Government spending? Social Housing grant called short term strategy, offloading homeless to other regions Budget 2016: In their words Budget 2016: What Budget 2016 tells us about the next election Mike Williams: Govt delivers a Budget that strives to ignore the housing crisis

The Supreme Court has ruled against Kim Dotcom in his bid to gain access to evidence the US government has against him in his extradition case.

Dotcom took his extradition fight to the Supreme Court mid last year.

Dotcom's lawyer, Paul Davison, was seeking disclosure of all relevant evidence collected in the case, saying it is imperative to a fair hearing.

The Crown, on behalf of the US, says he should have access only to a summary called a "record of case".

The US is seeking to extradite Dotcom to face charges of copyright conspiracy, racketeering and money-laundering allegedly carried out by his file-sharing company, Megaupload.

The matter of disclosure has already been ruled on in three courts. Two judges - one in the District Court and one in the High Court - ruled that Dotcom should be allowed to see all the information, but this year the Court of Appeal ruled against him.

The Supreme Court - the final say - ruled by a majority today that the District Court was wrong in its ruling to order disclosure. 

The Extradition Act did not require full disclosure.

There is a duty of "candour and good faith" on the country seeking extradition, in this case US, but there is no suggestion the US did not comply with this requirement.

The Supreme Court said the District Court had no statutory power and no inherent power to rule towards disclosure.

The appeal was dismissed in a majority decision, with Chief Justice Sian Elias dissenting.

So far, Dotcom has responded to the decision by tweeting a sad face.

The German-born internet mogul was arrested in 2012 following a police raid on his Coatesville mansion, north of Auckland.

 

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content