Time for action on nuclear security

Last updated 08:15 23/03/2014
JOHN KEY: The Prime Minister will be a very small fish in a big pond at the Nuclear Security Summit.

Relevant offers


Sam Sachdeva: Greens take the lead as parties prepare candidates for 2017 election David Slack: No need to go overboard Selling scratchies online would increase gambling harm - Ministry of Health What did Donald say to Melania during that Waltz? GCSB Intercepts heard every word Ready or not, it's election year and the annual theatrics have started Angela Roberts looks back on ups, downs and almosts of four years at helm of PPTA Is politics the next move for outgoing PPTA president Angela Roberts? GP and poet Glenn Colquhoun: 'Every week I hear at least one story I thought was not possible.' Public input called for on plans to extend Kaikoura shellfish ban Paul Eagle confirms he will put his name forward for national politics

As Europe hovers on the brink of a second Cold War (or so the rhetoric goes), there could not be a better time for more than 50 world leaders to gather to discuss nuclear security.

OPINION: Prime Minister John Key will join the likes of US President Barack Obama, Chinese President Xi Jinping and South Korea's President Park Geun-hye in the Hague tomorrow.

The Nuclear Security Summit (NSS) was established back in 2009, by Obama, to respond to the threat of nuclear terrorism, and shore up international security systems around fissile materials.

It's the third such meeting. Previous pow-wows failed to realise Obama's ultimate goal: to secure all vulnerable nuclear materials by the end of 2013.

Key was a star-turn at the last summit in Seoul in 2012. In an off-the-cuff address, he cautioned a room chock-full of the world's most powerful, that they would be held to account for failing to stop a nuclear terrorist attack.

The speech clearly made an impact on Obama - who gave Key a shout-out in his closing remarks. He had personally invited him to the first nuclear security summit in Washington in 2010 because of New Zealand's staunch anti-nuclear position.

And since then? Actually, New Zealand,  that shining light of nuclear-free policy, is yet to ratify the Nuclear Terrorism Convention. It pledged to do so in Seoul. Radiation safety legislation is decades old - and the Health Ministry are still drafting a new bill - more than a decade after review.

New Zealand, of course, does not have a nuclear reactor. But like every other country in the world, radioisotopes are used in both medicine and industry.

The Government - particularly as it campaigns for a seat on the UN Security Council - also has an obligation as a global citizen to demonstrate a commitment to counter-terrorism and international standards.

But in the grand scheme none of this matters too much. He's been feted by the Chinese leadership in Beijing this week, but when he steps off the plane in the Netherlands, Key will be a very small fish in a big pond.

All eyes will not be on Key, or even the main event, but a G7 meeting on the sidelines. Leaders from the US, Germany, Britain, Japan, France, Italy and Canada will gather to discuss their response to Russia's moves to absorb Crimea.

With a Russian TV news anchor openly talking about reducing the US into "radioactive dust" with a backdrop image of an explosion,  the issue of nuclear security should be in sharp focus.

Ad Feedback

But a similar sense of urgency hung over Seoul in 2012, as North Korean prepared to launch a missile just 90 minutes from where the summit was taken place. A year earlier the Fukushima disaster in Japan raised questions about plant security. There was also a spike in the number of attempts to steal weapons-use nuclear material.

A draft communique, reported earlier this year, indicates leaders will call for more action to minimise civilian use of highly-enriched nuclear fuel to keep atomic bombs from the hands of extremists.

Many challenges remain, especially around cross-border co-operation to secure highly-enriched uranium and plutonium.

Ukraine gave up its weapons in the mid-1990s in exchange for international guarantees on security. Events in the last month offer no incentives to Iran and North Korea to go nuclear free.

- Stuff


Special offers
Opinion poll

Where do you stand on political coat-tail riding?

If it gets marginalised voices into Parliament, I'm for it.

I'm against it - if you don't get the votes, you shouldn't be there.

It's just part of the political game.

Vote Result

Related story: Voters reject riding on the coat-tails

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content