Tribunal sought for water fluoridation

KATIE CHAPMAN
Last updated 12:31 27/05/2014

Relevant offers

Wellington

Teacher jailed for sex with boy has nine months shaved off prison sentence Black smoke draws firefighters to Wellington Hospital Rimutaka Hill southbound lane reopened after crash badly injures motorcyclist Praying for a sale: Century-old church needs new home or it will be demolished Ghost in the Shell brings $85 million in economic benefits to Wellington Man cuts off power to next door unit during dispute over power bill Island Bay cycleway nail in coffin for Wellington dairy owners End could be nigh for Wellington Sevens as NZ Rugby shops around cities Drugged, no WOF, and wanted by cops - guilty plea to driving death charge Capital scores four Liverpool football greats for supporters event

Anti-fluoride campaigners have called for a regional tribunal to question the practice in Wellington.

A contingent of submitters addressed the Greater Wellington Regional Council this morning during hearings on the council's draft annual plan, once again questioning the compulsory fluoridation of the region's drinking water.

The council supplies water which has been fluoridated to meet levels recommended by the Ministry of Health to improve dental health. The water goes to Wellington, Upper Hutt, Lower Hutt and Porirua.

However, submitters at Greater Wellington today called on the council to reconsider the practice, saying there was increasing evidence the levels in water were not enough to make a significant difference on dental health, as it was only residual fluoride in saliva that made a difference to oral health, and that was at such a diluted level it became insignificant.

Instead, people were absorbing fluoride at a level that failed to account for factors such as age, weight or individual tolerance, dentist Stan Litras argued.

"The toxic level is easily exceeded by children aged less than eight."

Lynn Jordan said the matter should be considered by a tribunal that properly considered the different arguments. A tribunal or special review was preferable to a referendum which would be costly to ratepayers.

Councillor Nigel Wilson said he supported the idea of a tribunal given the division of views on the topic.

"There is a significant divergence of views from that of the Ministry of Health, so I would completely support a tribunal to be set up ... As a a regional council we would be irresponsible not to be involved in initiating that."

Comments on this story are now closed.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

What should happen with the Zephyrometer?

Build a new one just like the old one

Replace it with something completely new

Leave it as it is!

Clear the space - not a good place for a sculpture

Vote Result

Related story: Wind wand's future up in the air

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content