Option X a possible alternative

MICHAEL FORBES
Last updated 12:43 13/02/2014
Option X
OPTION X: A plan for a proposed alternative for the Basin Reserve flyover from 2011.

Relevant offers

Wellington

Eric McIsaac in court on charge of murdering his half-brother Alex Fisher, 10 Toddler found under duvet after going missing from property in Porirua French actress Juliette Binoche spotted in Wellington cafe Wellington considers bells on bikes rule to quell 'conflict' with pedestrians Does Wellington need a new secondary school in Karori? Obituary: Graham Fortune, former defence secretary, top diplomat, 1941-2016 Take me to the April sun in Cuba St: high pressure to thank for blissful Wellington weather Charges dismissed against Avatar movie props man accused of firing shotgun Bed-ridden Wellington woman changes diet to heal from chronic fatigue Age no barrier for champion bowlers

The New Zealand Transport Agency might not be Option X's biggest fan, but it has conceded the controversial proposal could deliver the same benefits as a flyover.

The concession came from the agency's transportation expert Peter McCombs this morning during the Basin Reserve flyover's board of inquiry hearing.

A four-member board is considering the transport agency's application to build a two-lane highway flyover, 20 metres north of the historic cricket ground.

The two-month hearing is now in its second week.

Option X has been proposed by the Architecture Centre as an alternative option. It involves forcing all local traffic to the west of the Basin and separating it from highway traffic via smaller overbridges at the Sussex/Buckle St intersection.

The transport agency considered the proposal back in 2012 but opted to forge ahead with a flyover design.

Today, board member David McMahon asked Mr McCombs whether he thought Option X would achieve the same strategic benefits as a flyover, if it had been put before the board instead.

Those strategic benefits include separating state highway traffic from local traffic at the Basin, improving journey times for private vehicles and public transport, improving safety, and making the highway more resilient against breakdowns.

"Can I give it a tick against the strategic options? Yes. It amounts to grade separation ... it was worth exploring for that reason," Mr McCombs said.

"But it failed in its delivery. I mean, I can picture all sorts of grade-separated options ... fifty years ago they were talking about running Kent and Cambridge terraces under the Basin itself."

One of the main reasons why Option X was not pursued was because of cost, Mr McCombs said.

The transport agency said it could cost up to $255 million, compared to $90m for a flyover.

Mr McCombs also questioned whether Option X was too complex to be constructed.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

What should happen with the Zephyrometer?

Build a new one just like the old one

Replace it with something completely new

Leave it as it is!

Clear the space - not a good place for a sculpture

Vote Result

Related story: Wind wand's future up in the air

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content