Editorial: Listen and learn, teachers

The Dominion Post
Last updated 05:00 02/09/2009

Relevant offers

Editorials

Editorial: Poor shouldn't fund elderly daytrippers Editorial: Public comparisons boost performance Editorial: Science a challenge for the Budget Editorial: Medical Council failed in its primary role Editorial: Quality education won't come cheaply Editorial: Reins still loose on public sector Editorial: Ugly truth behind Garrett's words Editorial: Stop the slaughter any way that works Editorial: Business bodies' merger a blueprint Editorial: Government steps too timidly on driving age

OPINION: Just who is in charge of our public education system?

Is it Anne Tolley, education minister in a Government overwhelmingly voted into office last November? Or teachers? The answer should be Mrs Tolley.

But recent events suggest that those whose job it is to prepare young minds for the future believe they are at the wheel. They need to be bluntly disabused of that notion.

At least one school head has outrageously threatened publicly to undermine the education policies that contributed to National's election win last year - it promised to set literacy and numeracy standards for primary-school kids, and make the results available to parents.

Teachers, afraid that, because such results will be subject to the Official Information Act, the public will be able compile "league tables" that show how each school compares with its fellows, pretend theirs is principled opposition. Rubbish. Their objections are political - this Government is not stuffed with former teachers and university lecturers - and visceral.

They fear any weaknesses will be exposed and that parents, some of them able to see for the first time that the empress in front of the class is naked, will opt to send their littlies to a school that does better.

Head teachers have been unmasked as complicit in attempts to derail Mrs Tolley's plans.

Though she insists that most of the sector is working with the Education Ministry to raise pupils' achievement levels, she cannot be anything but furious that Auckland primary school head Paul Heffernan has boasted publicly he would "even fudge the results big time ... ".

Why has this public servant still got a job? He, and those who agree with him, need a reality check. They are not the pivot around which education should revolve. Though inspirational teachers are integral to the process, at the heart of public education should be the six to 16-year-olds for whom it is compulsory.

And regrettably often, these kids are let down. Last year, research showed that 90 per cent of prisoners are "functionally illiterate" - their reading and writing skills are inadequate to cope with the demands of daily life.

Yet most of these inmates passed through a New Zealand primary school. As these kids struggled to read, write and do arithmetic, their teachers happily collected pay rises they saw as entitlements.

How can these teachers live with themselves knowing they have failed so many children? How do they explain the uncomfortably long tail of under-achievement throughout the public education system? How do they rationalise the millions the taxpayer must now spend helping the illiterate and innumerate recover wasted years?

Ad Feedback

The Government wants New Zealand to have a populace whose basic skills are such that they provide a foundation for further study in an increasingly competitive world, or that allow the less academically gifted to cope comfortably in an increasingly complex and technologically dependent society. And, ideally, they want children to learn the basics at primary school, rather than have the taxpayer pay for remedial education later in life. What, for heaven's sake, is there to object to in that?

11 comments
Post a comment
Jack   #11   11:26 am Nov 30 2009

I'd challenge the people who think they know the answers to put their hand to teaching and then confirm this wisdom. Good on people who want to give back to society and do the thankless jobs - especially when others sit on the side lines picking at you.

Maybe you should teach then Daz (#10) as you obviously have some expertise about encouraging people.

Daz   #10   10:29 am Oct 23 2009

Stay a trainee Mike. Please don't become a fulltime teacher.

mike   #9   02:08 pm Sep 06 2009

As a teacher trainee, I'm coming to the conclusion that many of the problems with education stem not from the teachers and schools, which do the best with what the limited resources available to them, but from the leftist ideologues in the education departments, universities and teachers colleges.

Teacher colleges for example, put a lot of pressure on teachers to make learning "fun and interesting," or "interactive" which is often extremely difficult to do when you have a large class of unruly teenagers and don't have access to fancy the ICT technology available at teacher's college. In fact, its often the dull and predictable lessons which actually work the best with low-achieving students.

What concerns teachers about league tables, is the danger that they won't take account of attitude and IQ differences between students from low and high socio-economic backgrounds, and that schools serving low socio-economic backgrounds will come in for unfair criticism if they don't achieve ambitious performance targets.

Rick   #8   03:18 am Sep 04 2009

Stephanie,

As parents, our main consideration in life is our children's wellbeing and future. Period.

The political veiws of teachers comes a very long second. We will scrimp, save, and work long and hard for our offspring as would every decent parent.

We are going to carefully examine potential schools and weigh their benefits for our children. If that means we have to pay a bucket load of money to get our children a decent education then we will not hesitate to do so.

We will certainly not leave them to the questionable talents of the Heffernan's of this world.

stephanie   #7   12:52 pm Sep 03 2009

As a parent, I'd suggest that you might have more understanding of teachers, and why they have concerns about how educationally sound national standards may be, when your children have been at school for a while.

Today's OECD Child wellbeing report shows Kiwi children doing poorly in almost every area EXCEPT education - to quote the report:

"Despite their relatively poor material living conditions, Kiwi kids manage high rates of educational achievement - the fourth best in the OECD." The report then notes that we have a bigger difference than most OECD countries between the children doing well, and those doing poorly. Will national standards help the 20% of children in the "long tail" of underachievement? I think the jury is still out on that one.

chris   #6   11:39 am Sep 03 2009

This is awful prose. Have the standards at fairfax slipped this much?

Rick   #5   07:16 am Sep 03 2009

Your edititorial is certainly getting a kicking from teachers. As a parent whose children are shortly to begin primary school, I found the editorial a blessed relief. The teachers, who are so vociferously attacking this policy, are simply afraid of the light that is about to be shone apon them.

Heffernan's reponse that he would "fudge the results big time" demonstrates an apalling lack of honesty and integrity from a man who is expected to assist in instilling those very qualities in the youngsters placed in his charge.

If I lived in Auckland, those remarks would instantly disqualify his school from those that we might be considering for our daughters. I will not be surprised if Auckland Primary experiences a sudden drop in enrolments as a direct result of his disgraceful attitude.

Chris   #4   02:49 pm Sep 02 2009

Anne Tolley isn't a teacher, she's a career politician. She's happily dragging the education system down the road of targets and league tables, something that the UK has recently had slated as being a catastrophic failure and which has dragged the focus away from the students and onto the league tables. She interfering in something she doesn't really understand and once again, here's a politician focused on her own ideas so much she can't even step back for one second to learn lessons learned around the world.

The more pertinent question isn't why Heffernan still has a job, but why Tolley has her job at all.

Murray   #3   02:30 pm Sep 02 2009

A government "overwhelmingly voted into office"? Really? If that had been the case, they would be governing alone. With the vote of one or other of two supporting parties the National-led government does have a majority. If NZ First had gained less than 1% more of the votes, and a few more on the Maori roll had registered a vote in line with the predominant Maori vote, there would most likely have been a fourth term Labour-led government.

Why is it that so many commentators set out to consolidate this myth that National romped home and that Labour were ousted in no uncertain terms? Under MMP, the standing of support parties must be weighted.

Anyone might have voted National because they wanted the drug Hercepton funded and were totally opposed to its education policy. Actually, any policy apart from giving income tax cuts was barely discernable.

To suggest that educators should blithely comply with a populist, political doctrine which might be repugnant to their professionalism is simplistic, retrograde and dangerous.

I suggest that the editor take a little bit of time out and have a read of his own newspaper. There is an article, "Butt out, teachers tell Families Commission". Miss Tolley's concerns are to do with social malfunction. There is not any substantiation of an implicit suggestion that educators do not share the same concern. The article referred to gives excellent example as to how debate, questioning and research is able to blindside either convention or decree.

This issue dovetails with the presently much heralded notion that democracy is nothing more than imposing the will of the majority; and that there is able to be governance by referendums and the advice of experts and their professional obligations are able to be disregarded.

Nick Nikora   #2   09:55 am Sep 02 2009

To coin a phrase from that delightful British comedy 'Yes, Minister'; 'governments cometh and governments goeth but the public service will always be here'. This is so true in many Western democracies where the public service runs the country. Japan the world's second largest economy it's the public service that runs the country not the politicians because they can't be trusted. As Sir Humphrey once remarked; politicians are here today and gone tomorrow but we the public service will always have our hand on the wheel'. The fact that teachers are defying the government is nothing new in New Zealand. There have always been fights between teachers and the government particulary National led governments. This is just a fact of life.


Show 1-1 of 11 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you sign in, you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

What do you think of the decision to substantially increase entry fees for Karori's wildlife sanctuary Zealandia?

Fair enough - the price rises are reasonable

Bad idea - it will damage visitor numbers

A necessary evil - they have to cover their costs

Vote Result

Related story: Zealandia to be twice the price

Featured Promotions